This is one more example of incompetence, failure and probably treason from the Obama Administration.
1 posted on
02/18/2016 5:33:04 AM PST by
detective
To: detective
2 posted on
02/18/2016 5:36:18 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: detective
Uh, why would he bomb his friends?
3 posted on
02/18/2016 5:40:32 AM PST by
Obadiah
To: detective
I guess no one here read the memo. Attacking our enemies makes them angry at us, and makes them want to kill us even deader than they normally would...
To: detective
Meanwhile, the ragheads are complaining that the Russians cluster bombing of Raqqa is killing innocents and all that ...
5 posted on
02/18/2016 5:43:38 AM PST by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: detective
the black pacifist will never make war
7 posted on
02/18/2016 5:47:23 AM PST by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
To: detective
He wouldn’t bomb them while two former seals were lasing their mortar positions, so why would he start now?
8 posted on
02/18/2016 5:47:27 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: detective
I have and idea.
Why don’t the hundreds of thousands of young men who fled Libya for Europe go back there and fight for their own damn country ... instead of mooch off of Westerners and expect them to fight all their dirty little religious civil wars for them?
Or is it not worth fighting for?
If it is the latter, then why the hell do we need to be involved at all?
13 posted on
02/18/2016 5:53:38 AM PST by
Lorianne
To: detective
Good thing we liberated Libya.
14 posted on
02/18/2016 5:55:13 AM PST by
zek157
To: detective
"the Obama administration has turned down a U.S. military plan for an assault on ISIS's regional hub there"It's all part of Traitorobama's "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" policy, to which Traitorcongress has given its bend-over-and-spread-their-cheeks support.
To: detective
In the war between western civilization and Islamic terror, Obama is not on our side. Of course he won’t attack ISIS or Al Qaeda. Did anyone sensible expect something different?
18 posted on
02/18/2016 6:11:39 AM PST by
Pollster1
("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
To: detective
He and Clinton assassinated Khaddaffi, on the hope the Muslim Brotherhood would take over. What they wound up doing is turning Libya into a jihadi wasteland.
19 posted on
02/18/2016 6:17:11 AM PST by
PGR88
To: detective
It would seem odd for Zer0 to attack the White House.
20 posted on
02/18/2016 6:21:42 AM PST by
mykroar
("Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." - Otto von Bismarck)
To: detective
Why would he want to hurt his true buddies?
21 posted on
02/18/2016 6:22:39 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: detective
If Obama attacked in Libya, he would be breaking his blackmail contract and his blackmailers would release the secrets they have on him.
He will not attack in Libya.
25 posted on
02/18/2016 7:15:28 AM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
