Well until that is done, we can't be sure. But you stated definitively that they do exist.
But really this is not worth an argument. I made a comment based upon my opinion, in recognition of extreme uniqueness to both Phyllis Schlafly and Justice Scalia. If you thought my intent was to insult, I apologize. You refuted my opinion without providing proof and I called you on it as a way for you to provide proof your opinion is correct.
I sincerely hope there are others like them, and you are correct. I'm willing to consider whomever you have in mind that share their uniqueness in your opinion. I myself don't see any on the horizon though.
True.
But I refuted your opinion BECAUSE you provided no proof.
Oh; I've none of my own to put forward. I was merely trying to point out how ABSOLUTE statements tend to make me a bit, shall we say, argumentive.
Not so much about the CONTENT of the statement; but the structure of it.
I think we are pretty much in agreement here over the lack of visibility of the 7,000 held in reserve.
Romans 11:2-4
Know you not what the scripture saith of Elias; how he calleth on God against Israel?
3 Lord, they have slain thy prophets, they have dug down thy altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.
4 But what saith the divine answer to him? I have left me seven thousand men, that have not bowed their knees to Baal.