Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz must recuse himself on Scalia replacement (Guess why?)
CNN ^ | February 15, 2016 | Professor Steven Lubet

Posted on 02/15/2016 2:29:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Despite the objections of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, President Obama has announced his intention to submit a nominee to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

And despite Donald Trump's call for "delay, delay, delay," the Senate Judiciary Committee will almost certainly have to hold a hearing on Obama's eventual nominee.

It would be one thing to vote against an individual, or even to stage a filibuster, but quite another to abdicate the Senate's constitutionally required "advice and consent" function by refusing to extend even the minimal courtesy of a committee hearing.

That brings us to Ted Cruz, who happens to be the only remaining Republican presidential candidate with a seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Under ordinary circumstances, Cruz would therefore be entitled to question the eventual nominee, and to vote on whether his or her name should be advanced to the Senate floor.

Cruz, however, has an unresolvable conflict of interest in this matter, which should disqualify him from participating directly in the proceedings.

As is well known, Cruz's claim to "natural born" United States citizenship has been questioned (bombastically) by Donald Trump, and (very seriously) by a number of highly respected legal scholars, including Harvard's Lawrence Tribe and the University of Chicago's Eric Posner....

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthers; canadian; cruz; ineligible; scalia; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Republicans need to get their talking points straight and just say that they are invoking the “Schumer rule:” No lame duck Supreme Court appointments unless it is a national emergency.


41 posted on 02/15/2016 3:54:46 PM PST by Armando Guerra (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"the Senate Judiciary Committee will almost certainly have to hold a hearing on Obama's eventual nominee"

There's the first lie.

Nothing in the Constitution requires the Senate to act on a nomination. It's up to POTUS to gain their formal consent.

42 posted on 02/15/2016 4:14:37 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

If true, then why don’t we have Robert Bork as a Supreme Court Justice.

The Mitch McConnell and the Senate Judiciary Committee can actually refuse to take the nomination to the floor of the Senate.


43 posted on 02/15/2016 4:45:37 PM PST by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yulee

Bork was greatly feared by the libs. They worked overtime to get him squashed.


44 posted on 02/15/2016 4:48:19 PM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Idiotic.

Anyone born an American citizen is eligible to be president. My two cousins were born in Saudi Arabia to their American parents. They were born American citizens and are eligible to be elected president. It is that simple.


45 posted on 02/15/2016 4:59:00 PM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nice try CNN.


46 posted on 02/15/2016 5:17:05 PM PST by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump doesn’t have the balls to challenge Cruz’ eligibility to be President.


47 posted on 02/15/2016 6:52:34 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They’re so cute when they are on crack.


48 posted on 02/15/2016 7:10:21 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Some idiot has an opinion!
Of course there’s nothing to back it up- he’s an idiot.


49 posted on 02/15/2016 7:16:09 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson