Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2016 10:44:59 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

The Establishment/Globalist are making their move.


2 posted on 02/15/2016 10:45:56 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

No. The answer must always be no.

The next president can appoint Roy Moore.


3 posted on 02/15/2016 10:46:14 AM PST by Ray76 (Our gov has become hideously deformed by the hand of the Dem-Rep-Uniparty. They must be abolished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

If Loretta Lynch indicts Hillary Clinton, I might find her acceptable. But she has to move fast.


4 posted on 02/15/2016 10:46:41 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Obunghole’s requirements: (1) Black (2) Communist (3) Lesbian


5 posted on 02/15/2016 10:48:05 AM PST by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Any of these clowns get passed by the GOP and they are done.

Period.


7 posted on 02/15/2016 10:51:50 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Why not NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio? Or maybe Bernadine Dohrn? Angela Davis.....


8 posted on 02/15/2016 10:52:25 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

It’s interesting to see the media build this game of expectation over who an Obama nominee may be. Clearly and unequivocally they are trying to build support for Obama to have this pick by creating this parlor guessing game of who will be nominated.

If McConnell is to be believed (yes, big if) then Obama will never get this pick, but the media is deliberately ignoring this and acting like the selection and approval is imminent. Again, this all seems designed to force Republican’s hand and cause them to relent and surrender to Obama.

If McConnell and Republicans know anything — at all — they certainly must know that this would most certainly be their very last surrender to Obama before the walls came completely tumbling down upon their electoral heads.


10 posted on 02/15/2016 10:52:52 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Valerie Jarrett?

Hey maybe Moochelle Obama!
She’s a lawyer!


12 posted on 02/15/2016 10:57:08 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

One name that’s certainly on Obama’s short list is Chuck Schumer.


13 posted on 02/15/2016 11:02:41 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Recess appointment of that great jurist, William Jefferson Clinton! William Howard Taft was on the supreme court after he was president.


18 posted on 02/15/2016 11:15:30 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


21 posted on 02/15/2016 11:29:08 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

comrade nero-bama has already gotten two of his chosen onto the court. There isn’t even a Constitutional requirement for the number of SCOTUS justices; therefore, Scalia doesn’t even have to be replaced (and he is pretty well irreplaceable). The Republicans had better damn well block any and all of dear comrade’s nominations.


25 posted on 02/15/2016 11:51:04 AM PST by E=MC<sup>2</sup> (Are liberals born stupid, or do they have to work at it???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; NFHale; ...

He wouldn’t dare. I’d like to see him try it.

Would it be wise for the Senate Republicans to act on a nomination which has no chance of winning and could backfire on the ‘Rat Party?


28 posted on 02/15/2016 12:33:11 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (The barbarians are inside because there are no gaits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson