Urgent Calls Begin For Scalia Autopsy (Body embalmed already)

WND ^ | 2/14/16

[DeathBeforeDishonor1]

WASHINGTON – The seemingly quick conclusion that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died of “natural causes” this weekend is prompting calls for an autopsy and toxicological reports by activists and across social media platforms.

William Gheen, president of the Americans for Legal Immigration political action committee, noted the media’s “rush” to proclaim Scalia’s death in a rented room in a resort in Texas as either “natural causes” or heart attack within hours of the discovery of his body.

“Anytime a head of state, member of Congress, or the most conservative member of the U.S. Supreme Court is found dead, an extensive autopsy and toxicology examination should be both immediate and mandatory,” said Gheen. “The horrid reaction and comments about his death expressed by many liberals online illustrate that Scalia was hated by many people. His death hands the power of the Supreme Court to the modern left for the first time in American history. The court can now vote, even without a replacement of Scalia, to radically change the United States of America. Scalia’s death means the Supreme Court is now very likely to rubber stamp Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty orders, tear down Republican drawn districts in many states including North Carolina, and take deep left turns on abortion, gun rights, or anything the liberals have ever dreamed of. Scalia was a solid vote against Obama’s immigration orders to be decided by April of this year. We do not contend there is a conspiracy, we contend that there should be no doubts, and the way authorities and the media are rushing conclusions will leave major doubts and legitimate concerns about a death that could lead to a radical political transformation of America to the left.”

[Nifster]

So what? You have said nothing that changes a findhibg of natural causes.

[cloudmountain]

I haven't read anywhere that he had any major health problems, that he didn't eat right.
Also haven't read that he didn't feel well, just that he'd had a long day and a long week and was turning in.

Not reading about it doesn't mean that those things didn't occur. Besides we can't believe everything we read, can we?

[butterdezillion]

You’re not comprehending. The only (or at least most likely) explanation that seems to medically fit what happened is exposure to arrhythmia-inducing chemicals.

Poisoning.

This judge is going to claim she was ignorant of the medical issues. Her ignorance of the medical issues is the very reason she should have ordered an autopsy. She is not licensed to practice medicine and should be arrested for trying to practice medicine and declare a COD when she doesn’t know squat - especially since a medical person should have immediately been suspicious.

I think this was an assassination. Wouldn’t surprise me a bit, especially given Valerie Jarrett’s statements that Obama’s 2nd term would be payback time and they had judges ready to go. And especially considering that Obama supported the right of a POTUS to order a top-secret hit on a US citizen on US soil. And considering that Scalia just took part in a decision to stop Obama’s destruction of the US economy via the EPA - and the regime is seeking to make Obama’s “legacy” permanent.

Given all that stuff, only an idiot would REFUSE to consider the possibility that this was an assassination, and the medical scenario seems to support that conclusion. A democrat judge making sure the evidence was disposed of before anybody could investigate is just par for the course. Maybe somebody actually even told her that “national security” required this negligence.

I have very, very strong evidence of how this regime uses agencies and individuals based on the claim of “national security” when it’s really just to cover for the Foreign Enemy Combatant who was illegally placed into our White House. At the proper time it will come out, and those who have never looked this evil regime straight in the eyeballs as I have will be dumbfounded.

[butterdezillion]

The democrat judge who claimed it was a natural death did not give ANY substantiating information when it would have served her purpose - and the need for closure for the American public - for her to do so. And it wasn’t because she couldn’t disclose medical information, because she DID disclose that he had had an MRI for a dislocated shoulder a couple days before his death. If she could reveal that, she could reveal that he had cardiac arrhythmia, or had had the heart surgery that would cause cardiac arrhythmia. ‘Cause the way he died makes it very likely that it was cardiac arrhythmia that killed him - NOT a heart attack, which would have been painful and would have woken him up.

This judge would have disclosed anything to justify her decision if there had been anything she could have disclosed. She did allude to chronic conditions, but that was obviously a fig leaf, because if any chronic condition applies she would/should have said that to justify her decision. The chronic condition that would apply to death by cardiac arrhythmia is recent heart surgery (which would have required time off from the bench and would have been reported to the public).

[cloudmountain]

The democrat judge who claimed it was a natural death did not give ANY substantiating information when it would have served her purpose - and the need for closure for the American public - for her to do so. And it wasn’t because she couldn’t disclose medical information, because she DID disclose that he had had an MRI for a dislocated shoulder a couple days before his death. If she could reveal that, she could reveal that he had cardiac arrhythmia, or had had the heart surgery that would cause cardiac arrhythmia. ‘Cause the way he died makes it very likely that it was cardiac arrhythmia that killed him - NOT a heart attack, which would have been painful and would have woken him up.
This judge would have disclosed anything to justify her decision if there had been anything she could have disclosed. She did allude to chronic conditions, but that was obviously a fig leaf, because if any chronic condition applies she would/should have said that to justify her decision. The chronic condition that would apply to death by cardiac arrhythmia is recent heart surgery (which would have required time off from the bench and would have been reported to the public).

Yep.

[humblegunner]

At the proper time it will come out, and those who have never looked
this evil regime straight in the eyeballs as I have will be dumbfounded.

[DoodleDawg]

It's not up to the family to decide that. It's up to law enforcement and/or the officials who pronounce death.

Only under specific circumstances. In a case like Justice Scalia's where there are no suspicious circumstances then one is not required, and if the family doesn't want one then their wishes should be respected.

Once the family knew that a dem operative was not only setting the media narrative but was also in control of the official records, why fight it as a family and put your whole family at risk of the same thing happening to them?

Your tinfoil beanie needs to be loosened by a turn or two.

[butterdezillion]

You are obviously a couch potato quarterback.

Put some of your own skin in the game and then get back to me.

[DoodleDawg]

You are obviously a couch potato quarterback.

And what are you?

[butterdezillion]

I am a battle-scarred veteran of this war. You have no clue what I have suffered to face this enemy.

If your family has not been hit by these thugs then you have NO CLUE what the Scalia family may be dealing with. Not. A. Clue.

[DoodleDawg]

I am a battle-scarred veteran of this war. You have no clue what I have suffered to face this enemy.

Oh I've read enough of your posts to have a good idea what you believe.

If your family has not been hit by these thugs then you have NO CLUE what the Scalia family may be dealing with. Not. A. Clue.

I've lost loved ones. Some have died under similar circumstances as Justice Scalia; alone, in their sleep, with no evidence of foul play. And in none of those was an autopsy called for, and we certainly wouldn't have wanted one.

[butterdezillion]

If this thug regime has not poisoned your family then you have no business even talking about what the Scalia family’s refusal of an autopsy means, because you have no idea what they’re dealing with. When you’ve watched your family suffer at the hands of this evil regime and know that all your children are at risk if you keep up the fight, THEN you get back to me about why they might refuse an autopsy.

Until then, you don’t know sh!t.

[DoodleDawg]

Until then, you don’t know sh!t.

Lot of that going around.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Do you agree with this assessment - that if the 9th Circus ruled to "fundamentally transform" the US and SCOTUS couldn't overturn the decision because there are at best only 4 votes to oppose the 4 liberal justices' votes, the SCOTUS failure to overturn the decision would not be a SCOTUS precedent and thus only the 9th Circus would cease to live under the 2nd Amendment (for instance)?

That's exactly the effect of a 4-4 tie in the Supreme Court. The lower court decision stands, but not as precedent in other Circuits.