Bob Woodward says Hillary Clinton ‘shouts’ too much

MSN News ^ | Feb 4, 2016 | ADAM EDELMAN

[detective]

This is typical of the MSM. They do not understand that Hillary Clinton is a lying, murdering, treasonous leftist that no decent American would ever vote for. The ignore every real reason people can't stand the Clintons and pretend it is only because of "style and delivery". The same people said Reagan was only popular because people were too stupid to see past his smooth delivery and effective speaking style.

The MSM is completely corrupt. Woodward is one of the MSM liberal heroes. He is totally corrupt and dishonest.

[txnativegop]

I would comment, but you did it for me. :^)

[Paladin2]

” I’m sick and tired.....”

[Daniel Ramsey]

To many windows and and glassware breaking when she speaks?

[gaijin]

It’s really breathtaking, the things The Establishment is “discovering”.

Hillary’s thrown lamps have been standard fare here at FR for over 15 years.

And one of the country’s TOP journos understands this NOW.

Did you know if you attend Columbia’s School of Journalism for one year you will have to pay $85,000...?

[Lurkinanloomin]

Woodward recognizes that Hillary’s voice when raised reminds us all of someone we do not want to hear from.

[TomServo]

The most annoying voices in politics today?

1). Hillary
2). Palin

[Aliska]

She does shout too much and sounds terrible. I feel like cringing. And she's always screaming about Republicans.

Unfortunately, people I would think are decent, are voting or would vote for her. They blow off any wrongdoing she has done, and the more anyone gets in her face about it, the more her loyal clingers cling.

[nascarnation]

America's granny

[Rinnwald]

True dat.

Except, maybe in reverse order.

[glennaro]

This is true. A public address system is not a friend to either.

[chris37]

Hillary Clinton’s voice is the worst sound on this planet.

It physically hurts to hear it.

[blueunicorn6]

Nobody is loyal to Hillary.

She’s too nasty and arrogant for people to be loyal to her.

If she can’t hand out other people’s money, she will only get one vote.

[Bubba_Leroy]

That's sexist!

[thorvaldr]

I would say that, specifically in her struggle against Bernie, since they are both radical leftist, Marxist you have to look at what set them apart..
1. She is amazingly, cartoonishly corrupt. Bernie is supported by mafia union bosses, but he can’t compete with her for corruption. Usually Democrat voter don’t care about this sort of thing.
2. No, she is not slightly likable.
3. She is running almost entirely on gun confiscation. this is what she claims is the big difference between her and Bernie. He rabid vitriolic attack on basic human rights doesn’t seem to be playing well even among leftists.

[nascarnation]

[lowbridge]

Soooo...Woodward. Will you be getting on that in depth investigative reporting on any one of the Hillary scandals? You know, like the one you did on Nixon?

[JoeProBono]

[Buckeye McFrog]

If she can't hand out other people's money, she will only get one vote.

Absolutely true. Which is why the Dem campaign will be a Freebie Lollapalooza the likes of which you can scarcely conceive.

[Maverick68]

she’s bossy...