Posted on 02/01/2016 6:07:07 PM PST by Libloather
The federal judge overseeing the main Hillary Clinton e-mail lawsuit has scheduled a status conference for next week to see where the headline-generating case goes from here.
Judge Rudolph Contreras will ask the lawyers at the hearing on February 9 where the lawsuit stands, now that the State Department has said it will finish disclosing the relevant documents by the end of the month.
February 9 also happens to be the day of the New Hampshire primary.
A year ago, Jason Leopold, an investigative reporter for VICE News, filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department, seeking records related to Mrs. Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. The lawsuit took on new prominence with the disclosure last March that she used a private e-mail server.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
Wake me up when they slap the cuffs on her.
Not even a Civil Case. This is an FOIA Case. That is why HC has been given over three years to provide the emails. They asked for a delay. They have already broken the deadline. Judge will declare it all Moot. Worse that could happen is fines and legal fees.
Don’t be too quick to dismiss the Judge’s actions on this...he has been very stern with the parties up to now.
The 32nd of Febtembruary.
No, Mrs. Bill Clinton may not be indicted but she'll never be vindicated.
Cruz is kicking butt. Hillary is kicking butt. Hillary will be the next president. That was decided in 2008 when she accepted the SOS job and campaigned for Obama.
Are you a troll?
Dead judge walking.
Rats!
When push comes to shove, He’s the kenyans boy. I don’t expect a rational outcome.
Well, isn’t that interesting?
Obama will not let Hillary go down. No way. The revolution must be continued at all costs.
????
What’s up?
Year old FOIA suit.
While most of the attention on Hillary Clinton's emails dealt with a document that included instructions from Clinton to tamper with the headings of a possibly classified subject, another, even more explosive email is big news in Sudan and could potentially lead to criminal charges.
The damaging email in question is from Sid Blumenthal, close Clinton friend and ally, who was in Libya working on his consulting business.....trying to drum up business with the Libyan government for some business associates. >To ingratiate himself with Secretary Clinton and get the State Department to intercede with the Libyan government on his behalf, he sent Hillary "intelligence" briefs on what was happening on the ground in Libya and elsewhere in the Middle East. --SNIP---
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/little_noticed_hillary_email_might_contain_nsa_intercepts.html#ixzz3wtDCg1IJ
============================================
REFERENCE Hillary Rodham Clinton associate, Sidney Blumenthal, was drawing a $10,000 monthly salary from the Clinton Foundation (Bill had duped Foundation donors and directors into believing Sid was hired to advance Bills presidential legacy).
Sid was eternally prostrate, sucking up to Hillary, pocketing a bundle from the Foundation while penning e-mails to her at the State Department about Benghazi, and other hot spots, it was revealed Thursday (circa 5/15).
Blumenthal is a longtime Clinton adviser, but efforts to bring him to the State Department in 2009 were thwarted by the Obama admin. After 2008, Blumenthal was ballyhooed as Bills historian, getting big bucks on the foundation payroll at the request of Bill Clinton. Foundation insiders grumbled that Blumenthal got the job as a favor. (Politico report)
Blumenthal was a whiz at multi-tasking.....serving as a paid consultant to American Bridge and Media Matters, two Democratic groups affiliated with Clintons 2016 efforts.
Blumenthals numerous dispatches to Clinton figure prominently in the State Departmenâs 2015 release of e-mails related to the deadly terror attack on the US compound in Benghazi, Libya. Clinton forwarded many of Sids emails along to her colleagues at State.
Blumenthal also advised two companies seeking to do deals in Libya --- deals conditioned on the fall of Moammar Khadafy, The New York Times reported. Hillary and Obama accommodated Sid---ordered the Khadafy takeout---(perhaps for a cut of the action?).
http://nypost.com/2015/05/29/foundation-advisers-double-duty-counseling-hillary-on-benghazi/
hat tip Geoff Earle, NYPost, 5/29/15
My gut feeling is the cunning Clintonids didn't sign off b/c that would have cutoff their access to classified and other State Dept info......info the greedy Clintons and their cronies use to cash-in.
==============================================
The FBI should determine if Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Sid Blumenthal and other Clinton cronies are STILL considered State Dept employees---perhaps as contractors--- and are still receiving classified State Dept mail and cashing US govt paychecks.
REFERENCE Brian Pagliano---billed as Hillary's personal IT--- left her employ then surfaced on the public payroll as a State Dept contractor.
======================================
Taxpayers demand to know who else among the Clinton cronies are cashing US govt paychecks. It's an old bureaucratic trick for a politician to hand-pick top aides and put them on the public payroll long after you think they're gone. Who might still be cashing State Dept paychecks?
<><> Hillary?
<><> Bill Clinton?
<><> Sid Blumenthal?
<><> Huma Abedin,
<><> Anthony Weiner, Huma's husband?
<><> Cheryl Mills?
<><> Cheryl mills' live-in David Domenici?
<><> Chelsea Clinton?
<><> Chelsea's husband?
========================================
FREEPER ACTION NOW---CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
Demand Congress send you all available information on individuals connected to Hillary still cashing US govt paychecks.
In light of the $6 billion that went missing from the State Dept's contractor fund when Hillary exited, taxpayers demand to know who is listed as a State Dept contractor....and whether they are receiving classified State Dept info.
biden is the default position. actually, he is evidence the election is conceded
no one else will take the job to run in this election.
I agree that Biden is a better chance for the D’s, they would be saddled with a real loser with Hillary. Biden is not a great candidate either, of course. It’s fascinating how our nation’s largest political party with millions of members can’t come up with even one really plausible candidate. Not even one from all 57 states
Official then ... a hearing.
Just imagine — an actual criminal hearing of a Clinton scandal after close to two decades of research on this forum!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.