Trump screws everyone but himself

americanthinker.com ^ | 2/1/2016 | Ed Lasky

[rktman]

So Iowans and all people should be forewarned. You are entrusting your precious support and vote for a man who has fraudulently represented himself as someone standing up for the little guy. In reality, he has only cared about the man whose name he emblazons on every item he could. His campaign is not about you -- it is about him. And he will screw you, as he always has done.

[rktman]

Hmmm. Well, Iowans and everybody else. Looks to me like the train keeps rolling along and all the republicrat infighting will help enable hildebeast or uncle bernie to move up to the locomotive and speed us headlong in to the abyss. Seriously, shouldn't we be focusing on derailing those two assclowns as quickly as possible? If we don't, the stars and stripes may never see the light of day on my flag pole again. She came down nearly 4 years ago when the lyin' king garnered enough votes to remain in place. I'm not ready to retire the colors just yet.

[kingu]

Yep, the enemy is on the other side of the aisle, and hopefully, the focus will soon shift towards that.

I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?

[refermech]

It’s not like we’ve been well served by either party. Hence Trump.

[Night Hides Not]

So long as he screws the GOPe harder than he screws the rest of the country, it may work out. I’d prefer a more aspirational president, but these are unusual times. Still don’t see a need to change my tagline.

[JJ_Folderol]

>>> Trump screws everyone but himself <<<

Hemorrhoids?

[bolobaby]

I’m giving Cruz a chance to fix it. Failing that, I’m going Galt.

[exit82]

Another Trump hit piece.

On Iowa Caucus Day.

How unique /s

[napscoordinator]

Yeah. The millions of people on his payroll would argue differently.

[Jeff Chandler]

It’s not like we've been well served by either party.

.

[relictele]

AT have lost their collective minds in the past fortnight.

The Guardian has more sympathetic Trump coverage.

[DouglasKC]

Another stupid article whining about made up stuff. In their great “concern” about Donald Trump and eminent domain those who oppose him can only come up with ONE example that on the surface even looks remotely bad. And they only make it look bad by using the term “elderly widow”. This elderly widow BEAT Trump. And this elderly widow screwed herself out of millions of dollars that Trump would have given her for her home. And Trump did nothing illegal. So nice try.

[Duke C.]

Lighten up, Ed. We got this.

[BigEdLB]

Caucus starts in 10 1/2 hours... So still a lot of time. I am guessing one slam of Trump every 15 minutes, not counting duplicate posts.

[WhiskeyX]

“I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?”

If the Republican Party nominated Fidel Castro or one of Queen Noor’s sons and Princes of Jordan, would you vote for them? Would you vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger?

[CAluvdubya]

I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?

Well I sure will! I'm not going to cut off my nose to spite my face just to teach the GOPe a lesson. How about we teach them a lesson when the salvation of our country isn't so much on the line, as another 4 years of Clinton will most certainly take us over the edge!

[Pravious]

And this infantile diatribe is published by something calling itself “American Thinker”? That’s a joke.

[Mr Ramsbotham]

He may be a con artist, but he's our con artist.

[nomad]

My central question too, but my answer is still the same, No more Lesser of Two Evils.

[Leto]

WIth Trump’s 60% negatives if he wins the nomination it ensures a dem victory. Clinton won’t be the nominee, she will have a “health crisis” Biden will be the nominee.

[rktman]

LOL! You talkin’ about Trump or the lyin’ king?