Posted on 01/29/2016 5:54:20 AM PST by Kaslin
"As far as single payer, it works in Canada, it works incredibly well in Scotland." "I would press for universal healthcare. ... I would put forward a comprehensive health care program and fund it with an increase in corporate taxes." "We must have universal healthcare."
"I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, you have to [take in Syrian refugees]"
"I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." "I hate the concept of guns." "The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions." "I probably identify more as a Democrat."
"Everybody's got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing to say. I'm going to take care of everybody.... The government is going to pay for it." "I believe the Republicans are just too crazy right."
"I've very impressed by [Nancy Pelosi]. I like her a lot." "Hillary is a great friend of mine. Her husband is a great friend of mine."
"I'm a liberal on healthcare." "As far as single payer, it works incredibly well in Canada." "I am pro-choice in every respect."
Those are Donald Trump's words over the last number of years. Trump's position supporting a socialist healthcare scheme is about the only consistent position he has maintained.
In 2010, Donald Trump funded Democrat efforts to stop Republicans from taking back Congress. In 2014, he switched teams and supported the Republican Establishment against conservatives. Now he has tilted all the way to the right to support the anti-establishment conservatives he so recently hated as "crazy right."
Conservatives, particularly evangelicals, have lost their ability to discern wolves in sheep's clothing. Donald Trump calls himself a Christian, but has never asked God for forgiveness and sees no need to repent. Point that out to many an evangelical Christian and they will be quick to accuse you of judging Donald Trump. And if you point out that 1 Corinthians 5 makes clear that Christians are to judge anyone who calls himself a Christian, Trump defenders will proclaim they are not electing a pastor. Paul wrote, "[do not] associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler". The Bible also implores the faithful to seek out godly men for their leaders.
Pastors in the United States -- including Robert Jeffress of First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas, an evangelical megachurch -- have hitched their wagons to Trump. Jeffress and other evangelical ministers seem convinced that the flawed vessel of Donald Trump can make America great again when they, as pastors, are supposed to be saving souls, not nations. Jeffress and his cohorts are seeking earthly powers to fight spiritual battles.
That men who spend their time wrapped in scripture and preaching in pulpits are quick to embrace a man who is on his third wife gets me thinking. This man is on his third wife -- after having cheated on his first wife with his second -- and says he has never asked God for forgiveness, cannot name a favorite book of the Bible and has no favorite passage of scripture. This suggests to me that many Christian preachers in this country have unsure moorings and let their homesickness for this country as they think they once knew it supersede their homesickness for the land to which they have not yet been, but to which they supposedly long.
As Screwtape wrote to Wormwood, "we want a man hag-ridden by the Future -- haunted by visions of an imminent heaven or hell upon earth -- ready to break the Enemy's commands in the present if by so doing we make him think he can attain the one or avert the other -- dependent for his faith on the success or failure of schemes whose end he will not live to see. We want a whole race perpetually in pursuit of the rainbow's end, never honest, nor kind, nor happy now, but always using as mere fuel wherewith to heap the altar of the future every real gift which is offered them in the Present." Many a pastor and Christian for Trump seems hag-ridden by the Future and ready to pursue a rainbow.
Maybe, probably. But he’s right.
I wouldn’t vote for you for president either.
I cannot vouch for single-payer, abortion, and the kelo decision.
But I have extensively researched the gun control issue, and have written several articles about Trump’s views.
Your assertion on gun control is simply false. Trump in a couple of instances, put forward views that weakly supported a couple of gun control positions, 15 years ago. For example, he said that he supported the “assault weapon” ban that was already law at the time.
Weak support for an existing law.
Since then he revised his position and has strongly supported solid, pro-Second Amendment positions. He has done this more clearly and convincingly than all the other candidates other than, maybe, Ted Cruz.
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/09/donald-trumps-policy-on-second-amendment.html
That’s all I want to know. It is the most basic of questions but you’d be surprised at how many against Trump here won’t answer that.
As much as I deplore him, yes Gaffer, I can see me voting for him. Better than Clinton!!!!!
What guarantee to you have on his words FRiend? You 'trust him' with literally *nothing* but a pocket full of wishes. Led by your nose, right down the garden path...
Pay no attention to principle and discipline, and you should have little surprise when you find you've been taken. That day will certainly come, predictable as sunrise tomorrow.
You realize that government is paying for those people already, either through welfare payments or subsidies to existing hospitals.
Trump is just stating existing fact, and how he will reform it.
You have great wisdom.
Perhaps I should change my tagline...
Luke 18:13
“But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.’
The reason they won’t answer it is because they are afraid they will be banned, like has already occurred.
I’m not afraid though. If I get banned so be it. I will not vote for Trump. I don’t vote for cheaters.
I think I asked to to list lies in the article.
Why did you link to Comment 1 instead of a comment I made?
Fingers outpacing brain?
Anyone who believes Erick Erickson gets exactly what they deserve—I hope he sells you one of his off shore investments.
Ahhh, if only you made some sense. I can’t even tell what you’re trying, unsuccessfully, to say. It’s often that way with those that try to beat others over the head with Scripture though.
“By the time of the Republican National Convention, The Donald will OWN the Republican party, lock, stock, and rainbarrel. His personal ranch, to run as a fiefdom, and set the rules of visitation, custody, and support.”
Sounds like Trump’s aspirations for the country.
As I see it today, each has an opinion of what we need and their idea of who would best fix it. A conservative who did not seal our borders, send illegals back, undo obamacare, stop the spread of isis, create a climate for job stimulation, stop reaching across the aisle, take on the media, and move the GOP to action, undo the damage obama has done, be prepared to appoint the right man to the SC,... just being a conservative is not enough for this. There are many weak “conservatives” already in Washington... that is one of the problems.
These are not normal average times. We need someone who will fight the media, put some fire into the gop, and work for the people. Being a conservative is milk toast compared to what we need to save our Republic.
I’d like to know the age of those who still demand the person just be a conservative.
Of course not. I have not lost my way. I do not vote for liberals expecting conservative solutions... Hence, I will not vote for Trump in any case.
And if I were to be glib, your statement to me fits so, so many in our RINO Congress it isn't funny. Yes, Trump could be some of things you say, but you have to realize that this is the first time that anyone with the gonads to rail and fight back against the system (in our case a House and Senate of cowards that gives Obama EVERYTHING he wants) and make some kind of change.
This country went with Hope and Change on the basis of an unknown halfrican Muslim's BS promises. Would that the examination Trump is getting been done on Obama, or even some of the quislings in our Congress that still to this day purport to be conservatives.
“And you know why he did. It was because he smeared a former POW, that’s why.”
If the “former POW” that you are mentioning is John McCain, your reply is amazingly lame.
Trump fired back at McCain, who is one of the architects of our current sorry situation.
Is McCain the “former POW” that you are speaking of?
You’re miffed by the mode of delivery of the message, but where’s the refutation of the contents of the message itself?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.