Say hello to Korah when yer star bottoms out ehh?
Posted on 01/28/2016 6:57:59 AM PST by COUNTrecount
The rumors are swirling... Two Republican candidates reportedly called Donald Trump and said they wanted to attend his veterans fundraiser tonight at Drake University.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Catch up, or get out of the way, nit-case!
Leni
What’s your definition of Conservatism?
Same as the Log Cabin RINO’s?
Rome is burning because an idolatrous culture has mocked God, propped up its amoral fools as wise, and proceeded to self-destruct as per the punitive response described in Romans...
=====================================
Rom 1:24-32
. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator  who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
NIV
Trump is a member not a priest.
He wouldn’t be able to be an elder.
MY definition would certainly exclude the likes of you!
Clinton raped and molested women yet Cruz says he won't go there. Has Trump ever abused women that way?
You do have a screw loose. Cruz supporter? Or Rand Paul?
Cruz hasn’t gone after Trump on this. Others have. Obviously you don’t care, but I have little regard for home-wreckers.
Well, what IS your definition?
Feel free to cite the relevant historical and scriptural reference sources.
We have got too hung up on labels. It depends on the issue. Trump is certainly a conservative on immigration, security, the debt, trade, and the 2nd Amendment.
My, my I think I am having a touch of the vapors.
I was supporting trump early on until his “uhhhh it’s the law of the land” spots started showing.
Cruz isn’t perfect either, especially with his wife’s bankster entanglements. But I find him more palatable on social issues; and he doesn’t have Trump’s serpentine record of funding various liberal causes, either.
Rand Paul? No. The “Why shouldn’t Iran have nuclear weapons” apple didn’t fall too far from the crazy tree.
I could also vote for Tom Hoefling with a clear conscience.
ok ... assuming that is in his church’s structure, so what?
This is a non-issue.
I he going for some other job at the same time?
I call bull that you ever supported Trump. Bull!
>>ok ... assuming that is in his church’s structure, so what?
I don’t know what his church’s structure is. I know what the structure of the values I think important are; and I know what the scriptural foundation those values rest upon is.
>>This is a non-issue.
The moral framework of the POTUS is a non-issue?
Moral relativity is certainly an issue that has had a self-evident impact upon the strategic success of the process of demoralization in this country.
The cruz, Carson, huckabee Christians will vote for the Republican in a general, and if that is trump they must vote for him over the Democrat, or their numbers will be seriously deflated, and they will pretty much be obsolete under a Democrat. The choice is yours, it’s either the end of the country, and Christians or we live to fight on and add Christians instead of Muslims! The two don’t mix.
Say hello to Korah when yer star bottoms out ehh?
Citizenship at birth is automatic.
For example, had no one applied for US citizenship for Cruz, he would have zero proof that he was even eligible for such.
False. No one had to apply for citizenship for Cruz. He had citizenship at birth.
To document his citizenship, his parents could have obtained a U.S. passport or a Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States. Either is acceptable and sufficient proof of citizenship under the law, but neither is required. See 22 U.S. Code § 2705 - Documentation of citizenship and 7 FAM 1133.6 Evidence of Claim to U.S. Citizenship Under Sections 301 and 309 INA
To obtain a passport, Cruz or his parents had to meet the requirements under 22 CFR 51.43 - Persons born outside the United States applying for a passport for the first time.
But he has not released the proof that his US citizenship had been applied for and approved, and a CRBA issued.
He likely does not have a CRBA because his parents were not required to get one for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.