Posted on 01/25/2016 2:58:44 PM PST by Biggirl
The Legacy Lives On!
Mark’s Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation
“Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny
Welcome to “The Levin Lounge”… Step in and have a virtual FRink.
Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com!
You can call Mark’s show: 1-877-381-3811
Thank you.
LOL. Levin is just going down the hit Trump talking points check list.
Hard to believe he mentions ethanol as “crony capitalist” while skipping over the 5,000 page NAFTA on steroids crony capitalist written TPP.
The only reason to do that is if you are campaigning for Cruz. Levin doesn’t really care about these issues. If he did he would mention far bigger items like TPP. He’s just using these issues to push Cruz on his listeners, IMO.
What's new?
Election 1964: Nelson Rockefeller's public relations head, Stuart Spencer, said "We had to destroy Barry Goldwater as a member of the human race."
then refute them
ha
you can’t
I don’t see why any elected Republicans would even need to donate to Democrats seeing as how they ARE Democrats.
all the signs are there - one of which - anti ethanol - now pro ethanol
Have to say hearing that defense of Beck was quite infuriating.
I sense that Mark has been reading a LOT of what is going on here, on the different threads in regards to both Cruz and Trump.
pro choice - pro life
What Trump is doing IMHO is trying to win. Many of our friends have forgotten what this means. Rush calls this conditioning, I call it stockholm syndrome.
Running in 2016 versus 1980 is a little different, no? The population is +100 million and WWII and Korea era are vanishing fast. Their replacements are many imported people who barely recognize English or the Constitution.
So you have this different demographic. Shall our guy party like its 1980, running up the “conservative” flag? ( BTW, I remember those elections well, don’t oversell the (C) aspect, especially in 1980 when external events dictated the outcome ).
Levin, right this second is lecturing on (C)onservative principles or else, reading the Declaration, but I ask you this ... does it even matter to you or him whether the voters in the battleground states are receptive to this? Are they clamoring for lectures? Evangelicals? Constitutionalists?
Exactamundo. We are in the second or third Generation Kardashian election. Using trench warfare 1980 tactics is the surest way to lose. There’s no evidence anybody else in the race besides Trump does get that fact, IMO. Cruz is running a paleo conservative campaign and most everybody else is running hard left. That’s not how a GOPer get elected POTUS in 2016, IMO.
Big oil? You sound like a leftist.
Would he be the kind of RINO that votes for the Corker Bill?
I was taken by surprise about defending Beck.
Spoken like a pure Marxist. Some of us just are not pure enough to vote for Saint Cruz.
Have to say hearing that defense of Beck was quite infuriating.
Tragically, I turned off Levin and missed it. Maybe I have to catch it on replay. LOL.
On fire today. “Ooh! Meatballs! Meatballs! Trump! Mar A Lago!” Wiener Nation on a shrimp boat. lol
At some point in history, Beck was defensible.
Whatever he has become now is indefensible.
I agree.
you are not as smart as you think you are
how should Reagan have run his campaign?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.