Skip to comments.
The Long Game: A Guide to Counting Delegates
The Weekly Standard ^
| 02-01-2016
| Jay Cost
Posted on 01/24/2016 3:49:17 PM PST by brothers4thID
The conventional wisdom about Republican presidential nominations goes something like this: Either (1) a single candidate wins Iowa and New Hampshire, then sweeps the rest of the field; or (2) the winner in Iowa fails to take New Hampshire, and we wait a few weeks for South Carolina and Nevada to figure out who the nominee will be. Either way, the whole thing wraps up early, and the later contests do not matter.
These scenarios have played out, though, when the top candidates have been generally acceptable to the majority of Republicans. Under those circumstances, letting Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada sort out the candidates makes sense: The rest of the party will endorse that selection.
But the two candidates at the top of the heap right now -- Donald Trump and Ted Cruz --leave a significant swath of the Republican party (if not the voters, then at least the politicians, donors, and consultants who dominate American politics) feeling quite cold. This could mean a lengthy nomination battle that stretches all the way to the California primary in June.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: convention; cruz; delegates; establishment; gope; marco; rubio; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: agrarianlady
Do not believe these anti-Trump MSM polls.
The MSM hates Trump and conservatives almost as much as the GOPe does.
21
posted on
01/24/2016 4:34:48 PM PST
by
Menthops
(If you are reading this..... the GOPe hates you!)
To: goldstategop
Trump will sweep the field. Absolutely.
And total doofus Jeb should head on out to the swamps now and resume catching frogs.
22
posted on
01/24/2016 4:38:23 PM PST
by
Mr Apple
To: brothers4thID
if not the voters, then at least the politicians, donors, and consultants who dominate American politicsSo perhaps we will need the Ceausescu solution after all.
23
posted on
01/24/2016 4:40:47 PM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at all.)
To: gg188
I do not think they want Cruz either. Rubio would be a good sub for the pitiful Bush.The nominee, if chosen by the Rovian Establishment can get the nomination without winning it.He only has to be a respectable second or third place so long as the first place candidate does not get the requisite 50+% in 8 states. Then it goes to wheeling and dealing and the greatest dealer of them all can be cut out of the process altogether.
24
posted on
01/24/2016 4:48:15 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
To: agrarianlady
Hillary 43% Trump 38% I'll bet that total scumbag clown Al Franken wishes this were true.
25
posted on
01/24/2016 4:48:23 PM PST
by
Mr Apple
To: brothers4thID
How’s that internship at National Review working out?
26
posted on
01/24/2016 4:57:17 PM PST
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
To: ripnbang
I have never been employed by the Weekly Standard or the National review.
I have been employed by a very conservative US Senator, since retired.
27
posted on
01/24/2016 5:01:12 PM PST
by
brothers4thID
("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
To: agrarianlady
Minnesota, the land of leftist. That Trump is that close is actually good news.
28
posted on
01/24/2016 5:01:52 PM PST
by
Fai Mao
(Just a tropical gardiner chatting with friends)
To: goldstategop
If you understand how the primary really works, you’ll figure out how someone lost in single digit polling can take the nomination.
29
posted on
01/24/2016 5:05:19 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
To: brothers4thID
Hence...internship...implying not employed.
30
posted on
01/24/2016 5:05:56 PM PST
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
To: agrarianlady
Your average Democrat has no idea who Cruz is.
31
posted on
01/24/2016 5:06:12 PM PST
by
heights
To: brothers4thID
Donald Trump and Ted Cruz —leave a significant swath of the Republican party (if not the voters, then at least the politicians, donors, and consultants who dominate American politics) feeling quite cold.
I can’t believe the writer wrote this sentence. He’s as much as admitting that the donor class has been left out. Well boo frikin hoo.
32
posted on
01/24/2016 5:34:18 PM PST
by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: gg188
> Cruz Washington Establishment?
Those people _hate_ him.
33
posted on
01/24/2016 5:43:25 PM PST
by
glorgau
Please VOTE in the Free Republic Caucus 01/24/2016.
Thank you.
34
posted on
01/24/2016 5:45:03 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EDST)
To: brothers4thID
Or, Trump could just run the table and its a real short game. :-)
35
posted on
01/24/2016 5:48:12 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Again, please read the article. And/or explain your version of “running the table”.
36
posted on
01/24/2016 6:15:13 PM PST
by
brothers4thID
("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
To: brothers4thID
When the 2%'ers start dropping out, all of the "anybody but Trump" vote has a clearer choice and all of a sudden Trump's 60% unfavorable ratings come home to roost. Because if he can't win 51% of the vote in the later voting states, he can't win.
I agree, and have since I realized he had and will continue to have a low favorability rating. But I'm not sure he won't be able somehow to hornswoggle his way in.
To: goldstategop
Ironically enough, the rules were written to make that happen, just not with Trump in mind. LOL. Thanks for that ray of warm sunshine through my soul.
Hey, RNC! It sucks that you changed all those primary rules, doesn't it? Bless yer hearts...
To: caveat emptor
Keep in mind, that the same applies to the “anybody but Bush” vote.
39
posted on
01/24/2016 7:08:43 PM PST
by
brothers4thID
("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
To: agrarianlady
It doesn’t surprise me the liberal Minnesota gives Rubio a positive favorable rating. Rubio is more liberal than Conservative. ...Think about their elections of Ventura and Franken.
40
posted on
01/24/2016 7:33:44 PM PST
by
octex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson