Posted on 01/21/2016 9:10:18 PM PST by Isara
I would vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. Many of the Republicans who have declared that they would never vote for Trump gave carte blanche to politicians who have been complicit in the growth of the government leviathan. These Republicans have ignored conservatism in the name of party politics, and their broken promises gave rise to Donald Trump's candidacy.
Nonetheless, I will not be voting for Donald Trump in the primary. I take my conservatism seriously, and I also take Saint Paul seriously. In setting out the qualifications for overseers, or bishops, Saint Paul admonished Timothy, "If anyone aspires to the office of overseer . . . he must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil" (1 Timothy 3:1,6).
I think this is also true of political leaders, including those within the conservative movement. In October 2011, when many of the other Republican candidates were fighting Barack Obama, Donald Trump told Sean Hannity, "I was [Obama's] biggest cheerleader." Trump donated to both the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign, as well to Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, and other Democrats. In 2011, according to the website OpenSecrets.org, "the largest recipient [of Donald Trump's political spending] has been the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee with $116,000."
In a 60 Minutes interview with Scott Pelly, Trump aggressively supported universal health-care, saying, "This is an un-Republican thing for me to say. . . . I'm going to take care of everybody. . . . The government's gonna pay for it." He supported the prosecution of hate crimes. He favored wealth-confiscation policies. He supported abortion rights. On all these things, Donald Trump now says he has changed his mind. Like the angels in heaven who rejoice for every new believer, we should rejoice for Donald Trump's conversion to conservatism.
But we should not put a new conservative in charge of conservatism or the country, so that he does not become puffed up with conceit and fall into condemnation. Republicans have wandered in the wilderness already by letting leaders define conservatism in their own image. Donald Trump needs more time and more testing of his new conservative convictions.
- Erick Erickson is the editor of The Resurgent and an Atlanta-based talk-radio host.
Cruz isn’t a NBC as defined by our framers.
Where that articl?
Trump is NOT a Conservative!
If Trump isn’t , then Cruz surely isn’t
The country doesn't have the time.
Trump or Cruz or we all lose.
He’s not defining conservatism. It’s not even about conservatism. It’s about the very survival of our nation.
Trump is the only true conservative candidate in the race.
Erick is angry because Trump tweeted that he was fired like a dog.
Erickson is a fat faced fraud.
Nothing more.
Yup! And these a-hole pundits still don’t get it.
Amen....
We can’t survive with another RINO Jim...
Conservative? I have yet to hear Trump even use the term.
If these guys are conservatives, the you are right! Neither Donald Trump nor I are conservative. We are American Patriots!
Which is why I vehemently oppose electing a liberal like Trump. The last thing we need is another narcissist in the White House.
We’ve got to get someone elected first. If it’s going to be Cruz, he’d best get cracking.
Trump does not match up to Reagan's conservatism in any way.
You either do not understand Ronald Reagan's legacy or are too young to appreciate it.
“Trump does not match up to Reagan’s conservatism in any way.”
What was Reagan’s position on ethanol?
Trump isn’t running as a conservative ideologue, as I’m sure you’ve noticed. That’s Cruz’s strategy, and it’s failing.
Trump is redefining how to make American great again, and that’s why he is winning.
Do not loose sight that the man is remarkably 'an open book' narcissist....and one who has not learned to control the inner earmarks of this type of personality .... rather he uses them to create and cause fear and uncertainty to those who either oppose him or get in his way.
Many things are not reported about Trump because of his threats......a journalist wrote a story about him who was promptly warned to go no further via one of his staff with this message...
"I'm warning you, tread very f**king lightly, because what I'm going to do to you is going to be f**king disgusting... You understand me?"
It would be a terrible thing to give this man the power of the Presidency.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.