Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Supreme Court to rule on Obama immigration orders
Politico ^
| 01/19/2016
| Josh Gerstein
Posted on 01/19/2016 6:37:18 AM PST by GIdget2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: GIdget2004; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
Ping!
Click the keyword Aliens to see more illegal alien, border security, and other related threads.
21
posted on
01/19/2016 6:52:01 AM PST
by
HiJinx
("Man rides the ocean of history and does what he can to weather its storms.")
To: GIdget2004
I haven’t been following this closely but I assume if Obama appealed to the court, we’re screwed yet again.
22
posted on
01/19/2016 6:53:02 AM PST
by
Kenny
(RED)
To: GIdget2004; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ..
![](http://www.supremecourt.gov/images/banner_seal2.gif)
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
23
posted on
01/19/2016 6:54:46 AM PST
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: Kenny
Not necessarily. The Supreme Court has been somewhat decent on sep of powers and reigning in Executive creep and overreach by Obama. There have been a good number of 9-0 decisions that have quietly flown under the radar.
To: GIdget2004
and the fix is in again.
Yet again we will have the usual’s who are loyal to the fairy , instead of the country, the law , and the Constitution.
25
posted on
01/19/2016 6:57:34 AM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: tanknetter
From your lips to Gods’ ears. ANYTHING Obama wants, Obama gets. Don’t you think it curious?
26
posted on
01/19/2016 6:59:36 AM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: tanknetter
Not necessarily. The Supreme Court has been somewhat decent on sep of powers and reigning in Executive creep and overreach by Obama. There have been a good number of 9-0 decisions that have quietly flown under the radar.True, but my question is why take the case when Texas already slapped him down. Shouldn't have they simply let the lower court stand?
Unless they are so fed up with OTrauma, liberals included, they wanted to slap him personally?
27
posted on
01/19/2016 7:00:08 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
To: freeangel
We know one of Bush’s appointees will decide it
To: Founding Father
I’ll take that bet. Benedict Roberts will side with obama. Kennedy’s vote won’t matter.
**************************************************************************
You could be right...I find Obama’s executive orders to be very taxing and wearying to me personally.
29
posted on
01/19/2016 7:00:43 AM PST
by
House Atreides
(Cruzin' [BUT NO LONGER Trumping'] or losin'!)
To: freeangel
ANYTHING Obama wants, Obama gets.It helps when Satan is your father.
30
posted on
01/19/2016 7:00:53 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
To: eekitsagreek
Any executive action will be overturned by President Trump. Based on...what, exactly? Because he said something to that effect to get elected?
We'll see. But, don't hold your breath.
31
posted on
01/19/2016 7:02:39 AM PST
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: GIdget2004
We cannot depend on a 5-4 SCOTUS for ANYTHING!!
We must take over the GOP with Conservatives OR start a CONSERVATIVE PARTY and drum the GOP out of business just like the Whigs.
32
posted on
01/19/2016 7:04:29 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Lazamataz
We are just one heartbeat away from losing EVERYTHING, starting with the 2nd.
It is very possible any of those on the bench right now could die before the poser in chief leaves office.
33
posted on
01/19/2016 7:04:33 AM PST
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: jimbo123
Sigh, I’m afraid you’re right.
34
posted on
01/19/2016 7:04:33 AM PST
by
rdl6989
To: Lazamataz
It might be exactly that — given the previous 9-0 decisions the Supremes might want to send a somewhat more powerful message. “Since you just aren’t getting the message ...”
I wish I’d saved the link to the discussion threads on those decisions. They were really eye-opening given the 4 Libs joined in on them.
To: ObozoMustGo2012
More like the justices will be receiving calls to the effect, “That’s an awful thing you did back when...it would be a shame if the NY Times heard about it...” Or “We aren’t sure about your tax return for this year...but we can make the IRS look the other way if...”
To: tanknetter
37
posted on
01/19/2016 7:12:57 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
To: Lazamataz
“Thank God there are no Second Amendment cases under SCOTUS review right now.”
Amen to that.
To: GIdget2004
Anthony Kennedy is an open borders traitor. He proved that by striking down most of the Arizona’s SB1070. I have little doubt that he’s the one who wanted this, and he’s the one who’s going to prove Obama.
To: GIdget2004
And just how do we expect the Court to rule. Not a damn chance and the King Obama will be allowed to rule with the pen. The Court is as crooked as the rest of the Federal Government.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson