Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Birth Certificate for Ted Cruz’s Mother
Breitbart ^ | 1/8/166 | Joel B. Pollak

Posted on 01/08/2016 1:51:20 PM PST by don-o

Eleanor Darragh, mother of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) 97% , was born in Delaware on Nov. 23, 1934, establishing her citizenship by birth-and, according to U.S. law, that of her son, even though he was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on Dec. 22, 1970.

The Cruz for President campaign provided Breitbart News exclusively with the birth certificate.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americanunionheidi; cruz; cruzisright; eleanordarragh; fieldtrip; goldmansachsheidi; naturalborncitizen; reportcard; rollcall; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-502 next last
To: sitetest

I think you need a different word:

voyeurism

n.

The derivation of sexual satisfaction by watching people secretly, especially when those being watched are undressed or engaging in sexual activity.

n.

The derivation of satisfaction by obsessively watching or following sensational or sordid subjects.


361 posted on 01/08/2016 5:35:43 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: erod

Cruz did not pose for that picture. It was photoshopped.


362 posted on 01/08/2016 5:36:27 PM PST by Marcella (CRUZ (Prepping can save your life today))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

You’re an idiot. The original intent of the founders on Naturalization and natural born citizens is in the original Naturalization Act written by many of the founders.

Now go back to praising John Marshall and Marbury v Madison genius.


363 posted on 01/08/2016 5:36:33 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Proof 1) one can fill it out anytime up until one is 18 years old. How could filling this document out years after one’s birth somehow give citizenship ACQUIRED AT BIRTH?

Maybe you should consider that it wasn't acquired at birth which is why it is required.

364 posted on 01/08/2016 5:37:02 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I read that his mother registered his birth at the US consulate in Canada. And that he needed a US passport in High School to travel on a class trip to England. What was not made clear is if the registration was when he was a tyke or a teen. As he is a statutory citizen it makes no difference in his citizenship here. I think this whole releasing his moms birth certificate is silly as no one questioned if he was a statutory citizen by virtue of her being a US citizen.


365 posted on 01/08/2016 5:40:18 PM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Licoln? Really?
The POTUS who negated the 10th Amendment?
Really?


366 posted on 01/08/2016 5:42:51 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No, I have the right word.


367 posted on 01/08/2016 5:44:10 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
And as conservatives, don't we always look to Original Intent?

It was corrected in 1795 so yes we do. I realize that facts mean nothing and I am aware that various court decisions have left the meaning unclear, nut if you had asked any 5th grader 50 years ago what an NBC was they would have had no trouble explaining it to you.

Badly written Precedent setting decisions can not change the Constitution and NBC is a special class only applying to the Office of President. What we have now are some conflicting decisions and neither the Congress or the Courts have addressed it and that gives us what we have. Plenty of good conservatives are willing to drop all pretense of Constitutional Conservatism in order to promote their choice, all because if Obama could do it, so can we.

368 posted on 01/08/2016 5:44:31 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

Turn that comment around and tell me why I should trust the others who simply say that one parent is sufficient...

(and, BTW, I support and stump for Cruz).


369 posted on 01/08/2016 5:44:45 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

The law says it’s acquired at birth.


370 posted on 01/08/2016 5:45:03 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

The 14th Amendment has nothing to do with Cruz’ citizenship. As in none Nada, zippo. Why you ask?

Because the 14th Amendment only addresses “all persons born or naturalized in the United States.....”.

Cruz, McCain, Romney, Goldwater etc. We’re neither born in the US nor naturalized. Ergo, 14th need not apply.


371 posted on 01/08/2016 5:48:28 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Brent Bozell says he’s already in the process of doing so, but hey! What does that rube know, right?

Cruz works tirelessly, going all over to meet the people who actually vote, having conversations with them, while Trump holds rallies in big cities and ignores the work he should have been putting in all along.

Because those rallies feed his ego and give him the attention he thrives on. He isn’t interested in actually getting into deep talk with people...that would reveal he doesn’t have the first damn idea what he’s doing.

Better have your little crying smiley ready to go in a few weeks.


372 posted on 01/08/2016 5:49:06 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ("Ted Cruz is the type of guy to swim across a moat with a knife in his teeth. He knows how to fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: don-o

It’s not some green thing with multiple layers?

It must be a fake. < /DNCtalkingpointsmemo >


373 posted on 01/08/2016 5:51:13 PM PST by a fool in paradise (The goal of Socialism is Communism. Marx and Lenin were in agreement on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Cuban Constitution - Citizenship

http://www.constitutionnet.org/files/Cuba%20Constitution.pdf


374 posted on 01/08/2016 5:51:45 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Oh sthu with the constitutional crap. Trumpswabs support a guy that used the state as a hammer to try and steal some old ladies property for private use and gain. Now where the hell is that in the Constitution? The Trump Self Serving Clause?


375 posted on 01/08/2016 5:53:06 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Ladysforest
-- I read that his mother registered his birth at the US consulate in Canada. And that he needed a US passport in High School to travel on a class trip to England. What was not made clear is if the registration was when he was a tyke or a teen. As he is a statutory citizen it makes no difference in his citizenship here. I think this whole releasing his moms birth certificate is silly as no one questioned if he was a statutory citizen by virtue of her being a US citizen. --

I read the same, that there is a CRBA and a passport. I don't doubt that Cruz has US citizenship, and I agree with you, it is citizenship derived by operation of a statute.

I don't think his mother's BC proves the case, without more. 1401(g), the relevant statute, requires her to be a citizen at the time of the child's birth (I think she was, but her BC isn't determinative of her citizenship status years later), and residency in the US (again, i think she has this, but her BC doesn't have evidence of residency). I also don't think showing her BC is necessary. Ted's BC says the same thing that his mother's BC establishes, that she was born in the US.

A CRBA would be conclusive (of citizenship), as it accounts for the relevant factors. A CRBA isn't necessary, because those factors can be demonstrated with other evidence. I think the other (anecdotal) evidence results in finding the conditions for 1401(g) citizenship are met.

I don't think Cruz is a natural born citizen, because his citizenship depends on a statute. He is not "naturally" a citizen, he is a citizen because Congress chose, as it is empowered to do, to grant citizenship to persons who would not be citizens by operation of natural law. Not that my opinion matters, others will decide the issue, and that decision will be based solely on the outcome the deciders prefer, with no regard to precedent.

376 posted on 01/08/2016 5:56:28 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I guess we each can write our own dictionary.


377 posted on 01/08/2016 6:03:51 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
Arab countries friendly to us do not want him.

They might be friendly toward us, but we are decidedly not their friends, so who cares the only reason they haven't faded in to history is our insane oil policy.

378 posted on 01/08/2016 6:06:56 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

My reference to the 14th amendment was to highlight the commentary of Sen. Howard and Rep. Bingham with respect to their definitions of natural born citizen, which they said was a person born on the soil to TWO US citizen parents.


379 posted on 01/08/2016 6:10:23 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Then they did nothing once Marbury v Madison was decided.

Not true actually, they have done things like letting little Tommy Daschle use some land denying the EPA regs imposed on it and it was not subject to judicial review. So mostly they use that power to line their own pockets. B1 Bomber Bob used to rave on this all the time, he was mostly ignored too. I think he used to say Congress has used that power some 127 times.

380 posted on 01/08/2016 6:11:11 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-502 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson