Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare options contracting and getting more expensive
Arizona Daily Sun ^ | December 27, 2015 | SUZANNE ADAMS-OCKRASSA

Posted on 12/27/2015 11:59:42 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

"......Last year, 86 percent of those who signed up through the federal exchanges received tax credits on their insurance premiums. The credits are available for families earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level. For a family of four, the income limit would be about $94,000; a family of two, $62,000.

....Other customers found themselves starting over from square one when their insurance company pulled out of the Health Insurance Exchange or was dropped from the state exchange, like Meritus, Gussio said. Meritus, a nonprofit health care cooperative, was actually removed from the list of approved insurance companies in the Arizona Health Insurance Exchange because the state was concerned that Mertius might not continue to be solvent in 2016. Meritus will close for good on Feb. 1, he said.

Some private, for-profit insurance companies that offer plans through the Exchange are facing the same financial strain, he said. United Healthcare announced this year that it would probably would not offer plans on the Exchange in 2017.

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 36 percent of counties in states using Healthcare.gov will see a net decrease in the number of insurance companies that offer coverage within their borders, about 17 percent will see an increase and the bulk will remain the same. There is a total of 2,603 counties that use Healthcare.gov.

The Flagstaff area went from 56 plans offered by a variety of insurance companies for individuals to 19 this year, Gussio said.

People also are seeing an increase in their health insurance premiums, Gussio said.

"The costs for individuals is unbelievable," he said. "We've seen some very, very high premiums. I haven't seen an increase this big in the 20 years I've been working in the industry."

Most of the families purchasing policies sold on the federal exchanges, even those more expensive, will be eligible for tax credits, based on previous years' experience.

Some individuals have seen premium increases of more than 20 percent and some businesses have seen 40 to 60 percent increases, Gussio said. There have also been some decreases in premiums, but the majority of price changes have been increases.

According to a Kaiser Foundation poll of 1,202 adults between the ages of 18 and 64, 46 percent said they tried to get health insurance but found it was too expensive, even with government subsidies.

The increases are partially due to the number of health insurance companies that are going under or are merging with other companies, he said.

Many people are saying they would rather pay the penalty for not having insurance at all rather than pay $1,400 a month for insurance they may not use, Gussio said.

That's despite the fact that the average penalty for an individual not having insurance in 2016 will increase 47 percent to $969, according to a recent analysis by the Kaiser Foundation. The average penalty in 2015 was $661.

Lewis said for a family of three, two adults and a child, the penalty starts at around $1,737.

"That's school clothes or a house payment," he said. "I have not found a person who doesn't want health insurance. They want to be able to afford it. We're trying to show people what's available."

However, Lewis said, even with the price changes he has not had a problem helping people find a new health insurance carrier. In some cases, he's been able to help them find the same plan under a different company at a cheaper price.

Businesses with 50 or more employees are also looking at paying the penalty rather than purchasing health insurance for their employees, Gussio said. He's had a handful of business clients come in asking about the 50 or more employee mandate that goes into effect in 2016.........." Full story


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aca; deathcare; healthcare; itstdstimekids; obamacare; romneyagenda; romneycare; statismkills; tds; tdsbyanyothername; universalhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

I take that your stance on a subject matter doesn’t change as you learn more about it. Again, stop being narrow-minded.


41 posted on 12/28/2015 3:50:54 AM PST by PJBankard (It is better to be thought an idiot than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

I see, when you have no answer, I’m “narrow minded.”


42 posted on 12/28/2015 4:12:49 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

TRUMP: As far as single payer, it works in Canada. It could have worked in a different age. What I’d like to see is a private system without the artificial lines around every state. I have a big company with thousands of employees. And if I’m negotiating in BY or NJ or CA, I have like one bidder. Nobody can bid. You know why? Because the insurance companies are making a fortune because they have control of the politicians. They’re making a fortune. Get rid of the artificial lines and you will have yourself great plans. And then we have to take care of the people that can’t take care of themselves. And I will do that through a different system.”...

____________________

there is so much truth in this it isn’t even funny

Insurance companies and healthcare conglomerates in this state buddy up and pass crony laws that prevent insurance computation and prices are skyrocketed in what is essentially closed markets, been this way for 20 years.


43 posted on 12/28/2015 4:34:11 AM PST by Chickensoup (Christ is coming to us tonight. We are less alone tonight than any other night of the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Tag line, sorry.


44 posted on 12/28/2015 5:07:24 AM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

We are all well aware that Trump has previously supported the idea of Universal Healthcare. I inferred that in my original post. Responding to your planted question so I would agree with you is asinine. As well, your question only proves that you are narrow minded. You only see to attack Trump regardless of what is provided to you.


45 posted on 12/28/2015 5:10:01 AM PST by PJBankard (It is better to be thought an idiot than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I remember him saying recently he would open the doors to purchasing from any carrier and any plan in the U.S. He sounded frustrated that he couldn’t buy from any carrier he found aceptable.

When I was younger I set up a residence at a friend’s place out of state so I could purchase catastrophic insurance, because my state didn’t allow it, because it was all I needed. Young people do not need full coverage 99% of the time and should be able to buy such a plan.


46 posted on 12/28/2015 5:12:32 AM PST by phs3 (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Theo many of the things you listed are not “needs” and yes everyone needs food and housing, why do you think that for those who can’t acquire them on their own we have public assistance, pantries and section 8? People can always find something to eat, even if they go a few days without food they won’t die. But if you are very ill and don’t have the money to get treatment you very well could. And we don’t want diseases to spread either...would be nice if we could go back to the days of the family doc doing house calls and charging reasonable fees then again we’re so advanced now and that’s a good thing as far as saving lives but it costs a hell of a lot to do so, therefor insurance is a requirement.


47 posted on 12/28/2015 5:14:11 AM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
And everyone needs healthcare. Every single person.

You haven't thought it through. As a Catholic, I know that healthcare is not a 'right', because not all people are born with equal physical health. Even though all humans are born with equal dignity and worth, they differ widely in physical health and ability at birth and throughout life. Further, we can see from scripture that healthcare is an opportunity for charity. As long as the government is calling the shots, our healthcare system will be a disaster.
48 posted on 12/28/2015 5:20:15 AM PST by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

how do you distinguish between a Paki owned inn and an Indian owned Inn?

are you confusing the two?


49 posted on 12/28/2015 5:23:22 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

HE sounds like a communist.


50 posted on 12/28/2015 5:42:46 AM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Montana_Sam

So then, get government out of healthcare.

But get them completely, totally out of healthcare.

Out of regulating, out of monitoring, out of healthcare. Completely. Give it back to the public.

That means, open up schools, allow all healthcare, allow competition. No government at all.

I’m all for that. But we need to get government out of it completely.

Somehow I don’t think anyone is proposing that.

I am. Or else we need government, to keep it fair. One or the other.


51 posted on 12/28/2015 5:53:48 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance./c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

There is nothing good about Obamacare. Nothing! It is a total nightmare and does anything but provide healthcare. Take it from one who has first hand experience with this pos.


52 posted on 12/28/2015 6:10:14 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I do not agree completely.

Obamacare made sure people, were not dropped from coverage.

At a time when coverage was rapidly, becoming ever more subject to economic problems (we keep sending ever more jobs to other countries, for crying out loud) insurers kept excluding people from coverage for ever more.

Obamacare says insurers need to cover anyone. 100%. Everyone.

I completely agree. That is a valuable change to our healthcare coverage, and we need to keep that.

It is important.


53 posted on 12/28/2015 6:17:35 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance./c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

This is no longer insurance. Forcing insurance companies to cover everyone ensures costs go through the roof and make healthcare unusable. I do not know what planet you live on but my health insurance went from about $5,000 per year to $18,000 per year and I am totally healthy.

I have dropped out and prefer to pay the penalty and get far superior healthcare from Mexico. There are clinics of American doctors right across the border that are so far above anything you can get here that it is disgraceful.

I actually get 90 minutes of consultation with my internist where we talk about what is going on with me. I also get a cardiologist and a urologist and MRI an ultrasound and a 300 value blood test for $2500.

If I wanted that level of healthcare here I’d have to spend over $20,000 because the insurance would not pay for it.

Obamacare is total crap and designed to be run like the VA where people are conveniently sidelined and killed off.


54 posted on 12/28/2015 6:27:56 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

America’s healthcare system is completely out of control.

We need to end it, or fix it.

One or the other. Either we fix it, and make it affordable for everyone.

Or else we need to get the government completely out of it.

I’m really not concerned with which choice is taken, I’m aok with the government ensuring everyone is covered.

Or I’m fine with government getting completely out of it, and opening the entire system up to complete competition. And I mean getting out completely.

That means we stop the government from doing anything about healthcare. Get it completely out of the entire business. Out of requiring who can practice what. Out of deciding what students must study for what licences. Completely out of the entire business.

Either one.


55 posted on 12/28/2015 6:36:27 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance./c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

In the meantime the government is culling the herd and killing people off.

I know this lady who is now DEAD because they took her healthcare away and forced her on Obamacare and her oncologist docs were not covered and she could not get the treatments she needed. She is now DEAD, DEAD, DEAD.

This is not the exception. It is the RULE!

Obamacare is being run like the VA. Just get people killed off and that is how you reduce costs. That is UNIVERSAL everybody is covered healthcare. Get real and wake up!


56 posted on 12/28/2015 6:43:27 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
[T]hen, get government out of healthcare.

Hear! Hear!
57 posted on 12/28/2015 7:18:00 AM PST by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

“In the meantime the government is culling the herd and killing people off...”

Yep! We will quickly become England.

“Socialized Medicine Director Dies After Waiting Nine Months for Operation”

http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/6037-socialized-medicine-director-dies-after-waiting-nine-months-for-operation

(snip) “...Case in point: Walter Williams reported on the story of ‘Mr. D,’ a Swedish multiple sclerosis sufferer who was prescribed a new drug that held the promise of mitigating his symptoms. Well, you guessed it, the government refused to pay for it because it was too expensive — 33 percent more than the old medication. But then there’s something you wouldn’t guess.

The state didn’t even allow him to pay for it himself.

Why? They claimed it would set a bad precedent and violate the principle of equal access to medicine for all. But here is that principle, properly translated: If you can’t save everyone, it’s better to let everyone die than save some....’


58 posted on 12/28/2015 7:42:39 AM PST by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

13 more months. Do not pay fine. adjust your W-4 so that you pay or recieve about 100 dollars. Feds can only withold refund money.


59 posted on 12/28/2015 8:35:20 AM PST by CPT Clay (Hillary: Julius and Ethal Rosenberg were electrocuted for selling classified info.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

ObamaCare= legalized extortion.


60 posted on 12/28/2015 8:53:46 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson