Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How much of the atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic?
Debunk House & American Geophysical Union journal ^

Posted on 11/30/2015 1:38:57 PM PST by Talisker

If mankind had never burned any coal, oil or natural gas, atmospheric CO2 levels would only be 30 to 50 ppmv lower than the current ~385 ppmv. And... There's no evidence that anthropogenic CO2 emissions have caused any warming in the last decade. The Earth has not warmed over the last 11 years.

Or in the last thousand years


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: co2; colorado; epa; globalwarminghoax; plannedparenthood; popefrancis; romancatholicism; stemexpress; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: CodeToad
I think this is it:

Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing?

Sorry about that, I assumed the link would be in the article.

21 posted on 11/30/2015 2:22:16 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ETL

The real truth about the hydrological cycle.

http://miltonconservative.blogspot.ca/2011/02/simple-chemistry-and-real-greenhouse.html


22 posted on 11/30/2015 2:29:24 PM PST by BillM (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The atmosphere’s CO2 % due to man is... wait for it... 0.0036%

The atmosphere’s CO2 due to ALL sources is ... wait for it ... 0.04%

The Atmospheric CO2 % due to the US (assuming we produce about 20% of the total of man’s CO2) is ... wait for it ... 0.00072%

For our dear leader to claim that man is responsible for climate change shows a complete lack of understanding- to claim that 0.0036% of the atmosphere can capture enough heat and back radiate it to earth to cause climate change is simply idiotic. To claim this is akin to claiming that pouring a glass of 100 Degree water into an Olympic sized pool of 99 degree water will cause ‘catastrophic temperature change’

Sadly though not one republican will point these facts out- There simply is NOT enough CO2 to capture enough heat to cause ANY change whatsoever- claiming it can shows a profound lack on understanding


23 posted on 11/30/2015 2:30:49 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Bookmark Thanks for the post!


24 posted on 11/30/2015 2:31:26 PM PST by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Jane Fonda sounds climate change alarm in Toronto
The Star ^ | July 4, 2015 | Christopher Reynolds

"The climate change problem is the issue of our civilization. It will affect everything about our lives if we don't do something about it," she [Jane Fonda] says.
___________________________________________________

Here's Hanoi Jane remarking on the agenda that Obama refers to as (quote)
"The fundamental transformation of the United States of America"...

November 22, 1970 -- During a fund-raising tour for GI deserters, Vietnam Veterans Against the War and the Black Panthers, Jane Fonda is quoted in the Detroit Free Press as telling a University of Michigan audience:

"I would think that if you understood what communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that we would someday become communist," and "The peace proposal of the Viet Cong is the only honorable, just, possible way to achieve peace in Vietnam."
http://www.wintersoldier.com/index.php?topic=Timeline
______________________________________________

Fonda made the following statement at the University of Texas:
"We've got to establish a Socialist economic structure that will limit private profit-oriented businesses. Whether the transition is peaceful depends on the way our present governmental leaders react. We must commit our lives to this transition ...... We should be very proud of our new breed of soldier. It's not organized but it's mutiny, and they have every right." --Karen Elliott Dallas Morning News December 11, 1971

From 1972: "I am not a do-gooder, I am a revolutionary. A revolutionary woman."

*******************************************************************

No great surprise here...

From RushLimbaugh.com:
Hanoi Jane Endorses Obama
April 3, 2008

REPORTER 1: Jane, who are you voting for?

REPORTER 2: Who gets your vote?

FONDA: Obama.

REPORTER 2: Oh, my God. Heaven help us all.

RUSH: The reporter for TMZ said, "Oh, God. Heaven help us all." Obviously the reporter is an Obama supporter.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_040308/content/01125111.guest.html

25 posted on 11/30/2015 2:32:36 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Bin Laden blasts US for climate change

January 29, 2010

CAIRO - Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden has called for the world to boycott American goods and the U.S. dollar, blaming the United States and other industrialized countries for global warming, according to a new audiotape released Friday.

In the tape, broadcast in part on Al-Jazeera television, bin Laden warned of the dangers of climate change and says that the way to stop it is to bring "the wheels of the American economy" to a halt.

Bin Laden blasts US for climate change
http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/bin-laden-blasts-us-for-climate-change/

26 posted on 11/30/2015 2:33:18 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Charles Manson, the notorious cult leader, has broken a 20-year silence in an interview from his prison cell to warn the world of an impending apocalypse due to global warming.

[snip]

"Everyone's God and if we don't wake up to that there's going to be no weather because our polar caps are melting because we're doing bad things to the atmosphere," he said.

"The automobiles and fossil fuels are destroying the atmosphere and we won't have air to breathe".

Charles Manson breaks silence to warn of global warming
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8460868/Charles-Manson-breaks-silence-to-warn-of-global-warming.html

27 posted on 11/30/2015 2:33:46 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Yes, I'm certain that a 7% increase of the 0.038% CO2 in our atmosphere will cause drastic temperature change.

And the that the following two things have relatively little impact.

,

28 posted on 11/30/2015 2:34:58 PM PST by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Let’s not forget that man was making heat energy before the industrial revolution- mainly burning wood. I recall areas of Europe and the Americas virtually deforested due to wood burning. (I recall that Greenland was totally deforested by settlers.) History does record that coal saved the forests. My point is for man’s impact on CO2, we can not just begin with the industrial revolution and also proving the BS of global warming.


29 posted on 11/30/2015 2:43:35 PM PST by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

it doesn’t even really matter whether nature has a mechanism or not- the real issue is that man doesn’t produce nearly enough CO2, nor does nature, to cause any climate change whatsoever-

The total amount of CO2 In the atmosphere is just 0.04% of the atmosphere- This is the real issue- there isn’t enough to do anything. Either the CO2 I n the atmosphere in small insignificant pockets around the globe, OR it’s one continuous ‘blanket’ so thin that any heat escaping earth quickly saturates it preventing it from absorbing any more, allowing the heat to blow right on past it- and only a small insignificant percent of the captured heat actually makes it’s way back to earth because atmospheric CO2 radiates the heat it captures out in all directions- not just back towards earth-

And when this insignificantly small amount of heat actually makes it’s way back to the surface of the earth- it is quickly overwhelmed by the current temperature and reaches equilibrium so fast that it’s simply silly for climate alarmists to claim it is changing the climate. It’s just like the example of the pool I gave in my last post- The small amount can simply not overwhelm the larger- especially when the small amount is so insignificantly small like it is with atmospheric CO2 back radiated heat

Try to picture over 99% of the escaping/rising heat going right on past the CO2 In the air- you are left with just less than 1% of escaping heat being absorbed, and less than that amount actually being back radiated-

Climate change due to man simply can’t happen- Not even if we increase our carbon output by a 1000 percent- even if we multiply all our businesses and homes and fossil fuel burning by many many times- We simply can not produce enough CO2 to do anything regarding the climate-


30 posted on 11/30/2015 2:46:18 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The numbers in your post certainly puts the issue into the proper perspective.

Wait until the “Dark Winter” is upon us! What will they be saying then?


31 posted on 11/30/2015 2:46:38 PM PST by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
Let's not forget that man was making heat energy before the industrial revolution-- mainly burning wood. I recall areas of Europe and the Americas virtually deforested due to wood burning. (I recall that Greenland was totally deforested by settlers.)

If you don't mind my asking, how old are you??

Just kidding! :)

32 posted on 11/30/2015 2:48:13 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

That’s more about methane and water vapor - both of which are more powerful greenhouse gasses than CO2


33 posted on 11/30/2015 2:49:21 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Don’t leave out the phytoplankton in the photic zone of all the bodies of water.

They are a tremendous ‘carbon sink’


34 posted on 11/30/2015 2:50:22 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Statistically?

Zero.

35 posted on 11/30/2015 2:52:23 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Really?

Seems like it would make plants wilt more than CO2 but, I digress.../S


36 posted on 11/30/2015 2:52:36 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy" Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

1) Get one pencil, and one 8.5 inch by 11 inch piece of paper.
2) Tap pencil on paper four times, creating four small dots.

Assume the piece of paper is one unit of atmosphere. The four pencil dots are the CO2 components.
The man made CO2 is a fraction of those four dots.

Those four dots somehow control the climate? Really!!

CO2 does not cause Global warming


37 posted on 11/30/2015 2:53:49 PM PST by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Techster

They will blame man for climate change still Stating “Oh we predicted a possible climate cooling- our models showed it could last awhile”

They have heir answers all prepared- They are already preparing for a possible cooldown by stating their is a ‘giant blob of cold’ in the ocean (can’t remember the location right now) that they are claiming ‘could affect weather patterns around the globe’

It doesn’t matter which way the wind blows- they will always blame man for it and the people of the planet wil believe them unfortunately


38 posted on 11/30/2015 2:54:15 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Sometime a while ago and I don’t have the source I remember seeing or reading that out of the 400 ppm humans produced 4% of that or 16 ppm.


39 posted on 11/30/2015 2:55:14 PM PST by Dad was my hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

That’s a great visual for envisioning just how ridiculous the claim that man is causing climate change really is-

But be prepared to have people look at you with glazed over eyes when you try to show them visually how much CO2 man produces- they will look at you like you are a ‘climate change denier’


40 posted on 11/30/2015 2:57:51 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson