Posted on 11/12/2015 10:33:39 PM PST by Red Steel
The professional punditry amid the Main Stream Media -on both sides of the political continuum- continue selling a narrative that Donald Trump is the easiest candidate for Hillary Clinton to beat. This pitch is based on their gaslighting claims and "opinion" and not reality.
Poll after poll shows exactly the opposite. In addition to recent polling showing Donald Trump beating Hillary in NC, FL, SC, VA, MN, OH, TX and NV - Democrats, by a wide margin, fear Donald Trump more than any other Republican candidate.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
....”Good God, he’s put out ‘papers’ on immigration, the second amendment, tax reform and now a whole book”.....
Well then let him speak what he’s written with some detail. If indeed he’s the one writing them. I’m not convinced he is, rather whatever it takes ‘to win’ regardless if they’re his own real ideas or not.
I’m not opposing him...I’m just not convinced he’s not a distraction. He’s got to be prepared in these debates to speak his ideas clearly....I’m not seeing that sufficiently for me to support him....especially since we do know Cruz is prepared and has been consistent.
3.5 million deported?
Hey, that was a good start!
His position is deportation and he is going to go after the anchor baby laws.
He has been slammed by media for the positions only YOU never heard of.
Looks to me like you love and profit from the invasion... So passionate you are in protecting it.
How does anchor baby laws have anything to do with deportation of existing illegals?
Yeah, that’s it. I’m really an illegal alien. I just play a Freeper on the internet.
Tonight Trump’s luxurious jet headed to Florida to the Sunshine Summit. :-)
And Truman deported 3.5 million
It helps in stopping more coming in by way of family.
It is time to be it all.
Time to end it all.
The “self-deport” strategy seems the simplest, and least messy — especially if you were to also prohibit anyone from employing illegal immigrants. However, what would the courts do? Could the courts, in effect, order the continuation of welfare payments, etc.?
I agree with you on anchor babies and likely a whole lot more in stopping illegal immigration. There is a great deal that can be done in stopping and reversing illegal immigration.
But, forced deportation is a false issue. It will not happen and is the wrong approach.
It is a cheap slogan and only distracts from doing what is effective.
In short, I think Trump’s supporters are being played. And that’s not good for conservatives who need to select the right candidate to oppose Hillary.
The courts have to apply the law. If the states and federal government legislate that only legal citizens can receive welfare...
This is the right approach.
It is easy to get a bunch to self deport.
Build a wall.
Then go after employers with fines and you have them starving or leaving.
Stop giving any dole to a family without at least one citizen parent.
Take away the carrot and they stop coming.
“The courts have to apply the law.”
Does that apply to the SCOTUS too, or would they be able to simply void the laws, based on their interpretation of the Constitution? I don’t know — it just seems like a big known unknown.
Perfect - Trump also leads in Florida!
>>Take away the carrot and they stop coming.
Yes.
We agree. And the Donald is selling a pig-in-a-poke.
:)
Oh, that’s right.
NOW, I recall recently hearing that DEMOCRAT Harry Truman deported 3.5 million ILLEGAL ALIENS ... MEXICANS.
Thank you, wardaddy!
You always have that question. You always have to fight that battle.
Nope. Didn’t happen. You’re conflating the self-deported.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.