Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Richard Dawkins Is Right
The Gospel Coalition ^ | 11/7/15 | Bernard N Howard

Posted on 11/07/2015 9:04:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

“Nobody knows who the four evangelists were, but they almost certainly never met Jesus personally. Much of what they wrote was in no sense an honest attempt at history. . . . The gospels are ancient fiction.” – Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion


If Dawkins is correct, one might imagine the following conversation . . .

Luke: Let’s have another round of drinks. I’ve an idea I want to run past you.

John: Sure. What’s on your mind?

Luke: You probably heard about the Nazarene named Jesus who was crucified yesterday. I think he could be the perfect candidate for our fake Messiah project.

Mark: One tiny problem: he’s dead!

Luke: Yes, but that means we’ll control the narrative. We’ll be in charge of his reputation.

Matthew: Who would follow a dead Messiah?

Luke: Nobody, so we’ll begin with a resurrection myth. We’ll hire some thugs to fight off the soldiers guarding his tomb so we can get rid of the corpse.

John: But a missing corpse isn’t the same as a resurrection.

Luke: You’re right, so we’ll have to persuade Jesus’s friends to spend the next 30 years telling everyone he’s risen from the dead, even if sticking to that story means they’ll be imprisoned or killed.

Mark: Okay, then what?

Luke: Well, to make a conspiracy credible you need precise details. So we’ll invent stories where Jesus interacts with people in specific locations.

Matthew: Won’t people just disprove the stories by visiting those places and asking around?

Luke: There’s no need to worry about that. We could invent a story about a synagogue ruler’s terminally ill daughter being healed, give the synagogue ruler a name, set it all in a particular place, and still no one—absolutely no one, not even the people living in that place—would trouble to fact-check. Everyone would simply swallow the story whole!

Mark: It sounds like we’re on safe ground there. But if we want people to follow Jesus, he’ll need a message. People have been waiting for the Messiah for centuries. He’s got to be worth listening to when he finally appears.

John: Good point. I’ll cook up some deep quotes.

Luke: Thanks, John. Mark’s right: you’ll need to put profound wisdom on Jesus’s lips that theological scholars can happily study for their entire careers.

John: Not a problem.

Luke: Guys, it will take us a while to put these documents together. We need to get communities of people worshiping Jesus in the meantime so that when our books come out they’ll get a good reception.

Mark: There’s a guy I know called Saul, he could help with that.

Luke: Saul the Pharisee? I can’t imagine him getting involved with this kind of thing.

Mark: Trust me, he’s our man. I see him leaving behind everything he’s been trained to do and planting congregations of Jesus worshipers throughout the Roman Empire, whatever it costs him personally—beatings, shipwrecks, and the like.

Matthew: Awesome. But Luke, can you just remind me, what’s the point of all this? I mean, what exactly do we get out of this?

Luke: Come on, Matt, it will be so much fun. We’ll watch people being brutally martyred, and we’ll know they’ve been deceived by our dishonest fiction! What’s not to like about that?

John: I agree with Luke. This is definitely worth years of effort on our part. Count me in.

Mark: Me too.

Matthew: I’ll do it if my name comes first in all the promotional material.

Luke: Deal. Let’s get to work.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: christ; religion; resurrection; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Love it!
1 posted on 11/07/2015 9:04:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Me, too.

Dawkins proves he doesn’t “know” anything——his “faith” is bizarre and IRRATIONAL-—as all atheism is. It is MORE rational to believe in a Designer-—science proves Design 24/7..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8


2 posted on 11/07/2015 9:14:02 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

LOL! He admits there was probably an intelligent designer out there somewhere. (alien of course)


3 posted on 11/07/2015 9:22:15 AM PST by georgiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I think this is a great video .....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHEjqvmQIZg

From the website: www.allaboutGod.com

Great website!


4 posted on 11/07/2015 9:24:18 AM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
Absolutely!

The Godless believe everything magically came from nothing, and life magically sprang from this matter that came from nothing.

Real life FACTS have no influence on their make believe universe. They are delusional!

5 posted on 11/07/2015 9:24:23 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Dawkins is building a humongous fire for himself. Looney stuff like this illustrates that book learnin’ and WISDOM are in no way interlocked with each other. IMHO.


6 posted on 11/07/2015 9:31:48 AM PST by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

He is not exactly up there in the pantheon of great minds.
Who gives a shi...er...Obama what he thinks?


7 posted on 11/07/2015 9:36:32 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Funny thing is, L Ron Hubbard set out to create a religion, and he did it! And Jim Jones proved you can get people to do anything. Oh,and Joseph Smith’s Mormonism? It’s so common, it might be easy.


8 posted on 11/07/2015 9:44:59 AM PST by sparklite2 (All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Yes, and each one of the people that you cited had a possible motive to do it (power, money, nutty). Also, they did not provide any evidence to back up their claims (like rising from the dead or other miracles). They don’t really resemble the circumstances of the birth of Christianity, but nice try.


9 posted on 11/07/2015 10:00:06 AM PST by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

It’s interesting that all 3 of those belief system administrations rely/relied on high levels of secrecy, and with two of them, have/had severe reprisals against those who left or stopped believing.


10 posted on 11/07/2015 10:10:50 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Richard Dawkins says that life on earth came from aliens.

Paraphrase from the following interview...


Aliens seeded the planet [earth.]

Possibly a designer from aliens, a higher intelligence, from elsewhere. From our molecules here on earth, we could probably find a signature of a designer from elsewhere in the universe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8


Dawkins cohort Michael Ruse goes even further to say specifically that “one popular theory is that [life on earth] started of on the backs of crystals”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUetJ3umTWU


11 posted on 11/07/2015 10:11:07 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiegirl

LOL. It is exactly what he “thinks”! The “earth was seeded by aliens”.

All people have “Faith” and they lie if they say they don’t. You can NEVER separate Faith and Reason-—if you do—as atheists have—you get irrational, bizarre “faiths” like Dawkins or Darwin’s-—were life came from rocks and “natural selection” can create more complex systems (LOL) and little green aliens dropped their eggs into a soup.


12 posted on 11/07/2015 10:11:54 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I must review my Hogans’ Heroes’ reruns again.

I had no idea Newkirk was so....

OOPS....no bullets...

(never mind). :-)

13 posted on 11/07/2015 10:13:59 AM PST by JEDI4S (I don't mean to cause trouble...it just happens naturally through the Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Nobody knows who the four evangelists were, but they almost certainly never met Jesus personally. Much of what they wrote was in no sense an honest attempt at history.”

Dawkins is right here. The Gospels, like much of the Bible, are pseudepigraphic. The earliest writings date from at least 90 AD, making it VERY unlikely that they were eyewitnesses to any of it, and the Gospels are evangelism, not strictly history. They differ in their accounts because they’re written to spread the news of Jesus to different audiences. In some cases, the details of their accounts contradict each other.

That doesn’t make Dawkins’s larger argument correct; in fact, he’s a closed-minded, militant bigot whose argument makes absolutely no sense and is notable only for its volume.

But he is correct on this particular point.


14 posted on 11/07/2015 10:17:26 AM PST by TBP (with the wrong hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Nobody knows who the four evangelists were, but they almost certainly never met Jesus personally. Much of what they wrote was in no sense an honest attempt at history.”

Dawkins is right here. The Gospels, like much of the Bible, are pseudepigraphic. The earliest writings date from at least 90 AD, making it VERY unlikely that they were eyewitnesses to any of it, and the Gospels are evangelism, not strictly history. They differ in their accounts because they’re written to spread the news of Jesus to different audiences. In some cases, the details of their accounts contradict each other.

That doesn’t make Dawkins’s larger argument correct; in fact, he’s a closed-minded, militant bigot whose argument makes absolutely no sense and is notable only for its volume.

But he is correct on this particular point.


15 posted on 11/07/2015 10:18:22 AM PST by TBP (with the wrong hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Donall and Connall meet Richard Dawkins"
16 posted on 11/07/2015 10:32:18 AM PST by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Preaching atheists are as boring as anyone or anything God ever created.


17 posted on 11/07/2015 10:32:24 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

Exactly. As Thomas Sowell wrote in his book on Intellectuals-—Real Life Experience is essential to understand most things. Great Books can enhance knowledge, but only with human interactions and with much debate of ideas and actually putting those ideas into action.

Pride and arrogance is what so many students are fed today, so they remain just simply morons. They “think” they know everything like God, when they have been fed so many lies and misunderstanding of “Life” in front of tubes or screens-—they “think” they are brilliant....LOL-—when farmers 100 years ago were so much more brilliant than they are-—and could actually survive on their own.


18 posted on 11/07/2015 10:33:06 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Bob434

Blind leading the blind, for sure.


20 posted on 11/07/2015 10:58:29 AM PST by georgiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson