Posted on 11/04/2015 6:44:26 AM PST by Elderberry
Trumpinator, x-spurt here is one of those who believes in an extreme conspiracy: that 117 Texas residents with totally clean law-abiding records in Texas, met during Sunday brunch rush in a busy restaurant and conspired to commit murder/assault/robbery.
âCossacks are not mentioned in the state gang assessment, but according to a law enforcement bulletin obtained by WFAA-TV, the group was working to grow its presence in Texas by eating into the Bandidos turf.
Cossacks are not mentioned as being such a gang but it seems the police think they were trying to become one at the expense of the Bandidos.
One thing you are not, Trumpinator, is an outlaw. You are a creature of safe convention who believes everything you read. No wonder you don’t understand what happened.
Because I am here to tell you that they are no more or less believable than any of the bikers. The most believable source is your own brain and experience, and application of critical thinking and common sense. The more limited the experience .. . the more gullible the brain.
No, I am not an outlaw and I was not there. That does not mean I support these bike riders as some sort of salt of the earth even if I may agree their rights were violated by cops.
So the Cossacks and Bandidos are god fearing patriots just out for a joy ride on the weekends? What am I not getting?
I was referring to “Wounds”. I’ve not seen that anywhere. Fired doesn’t necessarily = wound.
Especially considering that these so-called criminals wear patches on their back publicly proclaiming their membership in said "gangs"?
Do you attribute that to totally inept law enforcement in Texas up to that point, that fully two thirds of 177 criminals with neon signs on their backs saying "I'm a criminal!" (patches) had done their bad deeds without ever being caught until May 17?
Or do you think that these criminals are so smart, so wily, so clever, so professional, that they consistently outwit Texas law enforcement two out of three times?
Which?
So figure it was one of those two things or rethink your whole assessment of what went down; start with accepting the evident truth that a whole lotta law-abiding Sunday mom-and-pop American bikers were arrested and had their lives ruined by law enforcement on total false pretenses.
You’re “not getting” that you have swallowed a whole lot of bullcrap in what you’ve read about Cossacks and Bandidos.
I think the two gangs had a high potential for a fight, so the cops figured it was a perfect cover to murder them and then blame the gunfire on them. It's the only theory that fits the huge number of screwy facts of how the cops have acted.
How absolutely typical and revealing that you hurl slander after crying to the Boss about personal attacks.
Bump for later
Slinking off faster than Nifong’s bitter enders did.
a) Texas cops were too inept to catch them
or
b) these criminals were so clever and professional that Texas cops couldn't keep up with them even though they wore signs broadcasting their criminality?
.223 cal. fired into a crowd = wounds
bfl
LOL
There are thousands of comedians starving to death and you are trying to be funny.
Like I have said many times, when the trials are done, all you that cozy with criminals against law abiding citizens will be crying a river of tears to have to face the fact that scum biker trash can not act like feudal warlords and get by with it in Texas.
Are you ever going to stop with the insults and slanders? I challenge you to find a single post where ANYONE has said that law breakers should not be punished upon conviction.
btw, I did find where you DID ask the Boss to ban posting Waco threads. Posted it twice for you. Now, you go find what you need to find to back your slanders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.