Posted on 10/31/2015 11:55:49 PM PDT by WilliamIII
Obamaâs decision to send Special Forces into Syria is being widely viewed as a US military escalation in the country. The troop dispatch also signals that the US trying to forestall Russian successes in wiping out Washingtonâs regime-change assets in Syria.
In short, the US Special Forces are being used as âhuman shieldsâ to curb Russian air strikes against anti-government mercenaries, many of whom are instrumental in Washingtonâs regime-change objective in Syria.
First of all, we need to view a host of developments, including the hastily convened âpeace talksâ in Vienna, as a response by the US and its allies to the game-changing military intervention by Russia. That intervention, beginning on September 30, has not only dealt massive blows to militants, it has completely changed the balance of forces to give the Assad government the upper hand in the war against foreign-backed extremists. That, in turn, has sent the US-led powers trying to topple Damascus into disarray.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
I vote yes.
Sick- He’s protecting the terrorists
“And now I’m seeing sites that claim Putin is polling his allies to see if they would agree with using nuclear weapons to take out ISIS.”
That sounds a bit dubious to me. I can’t imagine what benefit a nuclear weapon would offer. Conventional weapons seem to be the natural choice for eliminating ISIS.
I’m not going to comment because if I do I would probably then have to plead the fifth.
But I will say this, back in the mid 60’s to mid 70’s it was called Fragging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.