Posted on 10/21/2015 11:06:02 AM PDT by Perseverando
licensed dealers are required to conduct background checks before conducting any sales.
No they are not.
They are required to have a purchaser fill out the appropriate forms to submit to law enforcement, who are then required to perform the background checks.
Your picture reminds me of using .38 special wad cutters to punch ring binder holes in notebook paper.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/16/supreme-court-guns-straw-purchasers/6180633/
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-court-guns-20140327-story.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/24/us-usa-court-guns-idUSBREA1N12820140224
You can assert whatever you want. It won’t keep you out of Federal Prison.
Dred Scott was overturned by new Amendments.
Kelo and Roe, while horrible, still have force of law.
You’re all arguing what should be. I’m arguing what is.
All that depends on State law where the buyer is a resident.
Some states allow cross state line purchases. Some don’t.
Some use a paper form submitted (physically or electronically) to state authorities for the background check. Some use NICS.
Some have a waiting period, some don’t.
Fish don’t stand still like reams of paper!.........................
I feel very secure knowing it is against federal law. /s
True, but if the ream of paper is at 50 feet, getting the holes in line and properly spaced can cost a wee bit of ammo.
Two words: Laser Sight................
Long time ago....Gramps and a cousin of mine...were on a bridge above the Arkansas River.
Our .22's did damage on some gars.....
You too?
When petty tyrants try to infringe on our basic, God-given right to freedom of speech, we need to wield that right as necessary for its own protection. When petty tyrants try to infringe on our basic, God-given right to keep and bear arms . . .
You cited news articles.
Sorry, I meant the relevant Article of the Constitution.
You don’t know the articles of the Constitution?
III & VI
And which of those permits the SC to limit the exercise of the bill of rights?
They’ve been caught by Congress more than once on stuff like this.
I guess you can’t read;
Article III.
Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State,between Citizens of different States,between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.