Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$3,248,723,000,000: Federal Taxes Set Record in FY 2015; $21,833 Per Worker; Feds Still Run…
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 15, 2015 | 3:46 PM EDT | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 10/16/2015 9:01:52 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The federal government took in a record of approximately $3,248,723,000,000 in taxes in fiscal 2015 (which ended on Sept. 30), according to the Monthly Treasury Statement released today. That equaled approximately $21,833 for every person in the country who had either a full-time or part-time job in September.

It is also up about $212,927,100,000 in constant 2015 dollars from the $3,035,795,900,000 in revenue (in 2015 dollars) that the Treasury raked in during fiscal 2014.

Even as the Treasury was hauling in a record $3,248,723,000,000 in tax revenues in fiscal 2015, the federal government was spending $3,687,622,000,000. So, the federal government ran a deficit of $438,899,000,000 for the fiscal year. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS:
Full title: $3,248,723,000,000: Federal Taxes Set Record in FY 2015; $21,833 Per Worker; Feds Still Run $438.9B Deficit

The credit card will not have an endless limit on it. When the piper demands payment, it will be with apocalyptic weapons backing him up.
1 posted on 10/16/2015 9:01:52 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I wonder how much of that was in fines, fees and necessaries from revenue from ObamaCare.


2 posted on 10/16/2015 9:03:12 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Raised taxes and Obamacare fines.

There is NEVER enough other people’s money.


3 posted on 10/16/2015 9:04:21 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

File this news under “deprivation of property under color of law”.


4 posted on 10/16/2015 9:09:56 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Unfortunately for me and mine I am an above average payee to fedguv.


5 posted on 10/16/2015 9:12:01 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Work harder, slaves.


6 posted on 10/16/2015 9:24:04 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I think there will be a massive re-booting of civilization. Then the Bushes’ “new world order” will be run by “one world government”, THE UN. And there will be a very small percentage of the “haves” living on top.


7 posted on 10/16/2015 9:24:08 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Does anyone contemplate what the receipts would be if our work force were all working?

That’s how you pay down the debt and rebuild the military.


8 posted on 10/16/2015 9:25:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Couple that will ending Welfare to about 80% of those receiving it.

No payout...

Tax receipts instead...


9 posted on 10/16/2015 9:27:13 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

The federal budget in 2000 was just under 2 trillion.


10 posted on 10/16/2015 9:28:13 AM PDT by smartyaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

A bit hard to expect the protection of decent, stable society out of socialists.


11 posted on 10/16/2015 9:31:17 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Well, when the UN’s charter was designed after Stalin’s constitution for the USSR by Alger Hiss, that was the intent. But the outcome will be far different, especially since we’re back to being “multipolar” as it were.


12 posted on 10/16/2015 9:32:31 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Not enough!! More! More! More! The “rich” will never pay their fair share until all wealth is in the hands of government, and everyone is poverty-stricken and enslaved to the government.


13 posted on 10/16/2015 9:48:06 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Agreed...


14 posted on 10/16/2015 9:48:23 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

And ‘they’ want more.. And more.


15 posted on 10/16/2015 10:14:07 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
I had to "donate" an additional $200 per paycheck just so we can avoid penalties and a huge tax bill in April...

we are being killed by taxes of every stripe....

16 posted on 10/16/2015 11:04:40 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smartyaz

And bloated by 99% by illegal/unconstitutional pay-outs/programs/departments/etc.

Just think how *amazing* a flat-slavery tax would be instead of the current fiasco! /s


17 posted on 10/16/2015 11:07:21 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well, of course we’ll just borrow more!
The media says we have to:

“November Social Security Checks Could Hinge on Debt Deal”
http://blogs.rollcall.com/white-house/social-security-get-squeezed-first-debt-limit-breached/

Media seems extra determined this year to get the debt limit raised.


18 posted on 10/16/2015 11:12:00 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All
As mentined in related theads concerning federal taxing and spending, please consider the following. The states need to amend the language of the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to lay taxes to the Constitution, the Court clarifing that Congress is basically prohibited from laying taxes in the name of anything that it cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Based on the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes, here is a rough estimate for what taxpayers need to pay Congress annually in order to perform its Section 8-limited power duties.

Given that the plurality of clauses in Congress’s Section 8-limited powers deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers as $1 trillion (but probably much less).

In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx News, shouldn’t be reporting multi-trillion annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to lay taxes in budget discussions.

The reason that we now have an unconstitutionally big, tax-hungry federal government on our backs is this imo. When the Founding States established the federal Senate, they gave control of the Senate uniquely to state lawmakers. Part of the reason for having state legislatures control the Senate was so that the Senate could kill House appropriations bills which could not be justified under Congress’s Section 8-limited powers, such bills essentially stealing state revenues.

The problem is that the Progressive Movement spooked low-information citizens to pressure state lawmakers to ratify the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A). And state lawmakers caved in and ratified 17A, foolishly giving up the voices of the state legislatures in Congress.

So now, after voters elect their federal senators, they go home and watch football while corrupt senators rob voter’s wallets by working in cahoots with the corrupt House to pass unconstitutional appropriations bills, bills which Congress cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.

Also, if it wasn’t for 17A, state lawmakers might have built up a 2/3 conservative majority in the Senate by now. This means that Congress could have possibly impeached and booted lawless Obama from the Oval Office by now.

So the first step to “balancing the federal budget” is to make 17A disappear imo, then to amend the Constitution with the suggestions in this post.

19 posted on 10/16/2015 11:40:22 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

One wonders how many families were destroyed by tax-induced poverty.

Meanwhile, the government hogs belly up to the trough.


20 posted on 10/16/2015 1:06:36 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson