First Ann Coulter Came For The Jews, Now It’s the Catholics’ Turn

American Spectator ^ | 9/24/15 | Aaron Goldstein

[markomalley]

First it was “f---king Jews.” Now Ann Coulter has turned her attention to Catholics.

In response to a tweet from David Limbaugh who spoke in agreement with Catholics who object to Pope Francis’s economic critique, Coulter tweeted, “I’m an American and this is why our founders (not ‘immigrants’!) distrusted Catholics & wouldn’t make them citizens.”

Some might argue that she is merely being sarcastic. Please forgive me if I fail to see the sarcasm of “f---king Jews.” But if her comments about Catholics were an attempt at sarcasm, it might be useful if she attempted to demonstrate a rudimentary knowledge of American history.

[highball]

At the end of the day, she collects her paycheck from either gullible conseratives or liberal Republicans, brags about how witty and Swiftian she [thinks she] is, and then lets her good buddy Bill Maher do his liberal spiel to her.

She is no conservative.

I'm amazed at how many on our side fail to understand this simple truth.

Most of the "conservative" figures in popular culture are just in for the paycheck. Like Limbaugh, they're entertainers who have learned how lucrative playing a conservative character can be.

[delchiante]

You folks are discussing Revelation 17.

What I find interesting in Revelation 17 is a color that the priests wore in the Old Testament is missing in Revelation 17- Blue.

All the other colors priests wore in the old testament are there in Revelation. Except Blue.

Blue is a color scripture specifically states represents a reminder of His Commands (Numbers 15:38-41)

A ‘blue-less’ church is represented in Revelation 17. Those who will not have a reminder of His Commandments.

And given Revelation 13 and the satanic Trinity causes the world to break the first 4 of His Commandments specifically, and Daniel 7:25 detailing ‘times and laws’ to change, it gets easier to sort out who is who in Revelation .. And frankly, it may be more inclusive than one cares to think about.

And when one studies things like the mark of the beast, they must first study Deuteronomy 6:8 to see what that represents. And things start to become clearer..

No PHD needed. Just the Scriptures

HalleluYah!

[Roman_War_Criminal]

Related...

THE SHOCKING MESSAGE POPE FRANCIS PREACHED AT NEW YORK’S ST. PATRICK’S CATHEDRAL

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=35894

[Texas Eagle]

First Ann Coulter Came For The Jews, Now It’s the Catholics’ Turn

Hyperbole we much?

[Norm Lenhart]

And Christie, and...

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

Is fine if the church is liberal (I am Catholic myself) & performs its services to.the community while upholding the teachings.

However, what is not acceptable is pushing liberalism onto a population by governmental force which is the opposite of free will and the church should not be promoting liberalism in government.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

Don’ trust a jesuit...they are the ultimate in the “ends justify the means” marxists.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I have no idea what your chart is supposed to be showing me as I relates to this thread.

Perhaps you could start a new thread with that chart and explain to me (us?) what it means....I bet,it is actually interesting.

[Yosemitest]

Then you know nothing except what Satan's Whore as deceived you with !

[Yosemitest]

It's already been done.

Who or What Is the PROPHETIC BEAST?

[Clintonfatigued]

Ms. Coulter seems to have contracted foot-in-mouth disease.

[vladimir998]

“Then you know nothing except what Satan’s Whore as deceived you with !”

You’re still wrong.

[Yosemitest]

No.
The FACTS are there for ALL to see, and those fulfilled prophecies don't lie.

[vladimir998]

“The FACTS are there for ALL to see, and those fulfilled prophecies don’t lie”

Your interpretations are not facts.

[x]

The "f%$king jews" comment comes DIRECTLY from Hillary saying it to Dick Morris.

And when she got into trouble for calling John Edwards a "faggot", she was simply repeating what a black actor said to another actor and got fired over it.

You can always find a precedent for something. Somebody somewhere always said something similar first. I'd understand a little if what she said was meant to be satirical, but either way it's no excuse.

[x]

I thought it was proven that the “F Jews” thing was a sly quote from Hillary that Ann used to mock Hillary? Not in the best of taste I admit, but still this is FR and we like to find the correct context for quotes.

That might make more sense if Hillary was in the debate.

As it is, it's a stretch.

[x]

Most of the "conservative" figures in popular culture are just in for the paycheck. Like Limbaugh, they're entertainers who have learned how lucrative playing a conservative character can be.

That's easy to say.

But how many people who don't get paid for it are playing a role?

[Yosemitest]

And what interpretations are those?
The Bible interprets its own symbols!
If we want the truth, we must be guided solely by the Bible interpretation, not man's interpretations and imaginations.
Did I write the verses in the Book of Daniel ? NO !
Did I form Nebuchadnezzar's kingdom, the Chaldean Empire (the first Kingdom), the Medo-Persia Empire (the second kingdom), or Macedonia under Alexander the Great (the third kingdom), or the Roman Empire (the fourth kingdom) ? NO !
Did I write Revelations 13, verses 3-5 ? NO !
Did I cause the Vandals to "sack" Rome? NO !
Did I cause Justinian, Emperor of the East, from Constantinople to create his Imperial Legate at Ravenna, Italy, and bring forth the "Imperial Restoration" of the Roman Empire ? NO !

What has Revelations 13:5, and Ezekiel 4:4-6, and Numbers 14:34, all of them, taught you through your "ACCLAIMED EDUCATION" ?
How many years were there from Napoleon's defeat. back to Augustus Caesar's rule in A.D. 554 (West's Modern History, page 337) ?
Remember Revelation 13, verse 5 "CONTINUE FORTY AND TWO MONTHS", or have you forgotten ?

What.... NO ANSWERS ? ! ?
Has Satan got your tongue ?

Now go to Revelation 17 verse 8, and look at the rise of Fascist rule of Mussolin.
Did I cause that ? NO!

The Bible interprets its own symbols !

Where, then, did human church government derive its present form?

"The first pope, in the real sense of the word, was Leo I (440-461 AID.)," says the Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, volume 7, page 629.
To him the form of government of the Roman Empire was the most marvelous thing on earth.
He applied its principles to the church, organized the church into a government, forming the papacy.

This church government or organization is the image of the beast.

Says Myers' Ancient History:"During the reign of Leo I, the Church set up, within the Roman Empire, an ecclesiastical state [government] which, in its constitution and its administrative system, was shaping itself upon the imperial model."
This church government, then, according to this historical authority, is in fact a model, a counterpart, an image of the beast which is the Roman Empire government.

The Britannica calls it an ecclesiastical world empire!

This image — man-designed and man-ruled church government — compelled people to worship the church!
And since the church was organized into a worldly government, this was worship of the image — false worship — idolatry!

But this church became a mother, and daughter churches came out of her in "protest," calling themselves "Protestant."
And all have worldly, political church government.

[Tzimisce]

We have given nukes to Iran, a nation that happily tells us they want to kill Jews, Israelis, Christians and Americans.

And people are offended by what Ann Coulter said?????!!!!!!!

She’s not threatening to kill anybody.

How stupid are you people???????

I love Obamaland - the least intelligent amongst us are held out as the smartest while common sense is mocked as old fashioned. :)

[vladimir998]

“And what interpretations are those?”

Did you not read what you posted?

“The Bible interprets its own symbols!”

No, the Bible no where mentions “The HERULI
Odoacer’s government, A.D. 476-493,” for instance.

“If we want the truth, we must be guided solely by the Bible interpretation, not man’s interpretations and imaginations.”

You’re showing you don’t even believe that if you’re posting “The HERULI Odoacer’s government, A.D. 476-493” because that appears no where in the Bible.

“Did I write the verses in the Book of Daniel ? NO !”

Show me where in Daniel it says “The HERULI Odoacer’s government, A.D. 476-493”.

“Did I form Nebuchadnezzar’s kingdom, the Chaldean Empire (the first Kingdom), the Medo-Persia Empire (the second kingdom), or Macedonia under Alexander the Great (the third kingdom), or the Roman Empire (the fourth kingdom) ? NO !
Did I write Revelations 13, verses 3-5 ? NO !
Did I cause the Vandals to “sack” Rome? NO !
Did I cause Justinian, Emperor of the East, from Constantinople to create his Imperial Legate at Ravenna, Italy, and bring forth the “Imperial Restoration” of the Roman Empire ? NO !”

Again, show me where the Bible says “The HERULI Odoacer’s government, A.D. 476-493”. Now, when you FAIL TO DO THAT - because no such verse exists - you’ll see the difference between what the Bible actually SAYS and YOUR INTERPRETATIONS. And those interpretations aren’t even really yours. They were produced by an idiot - George Armstrong or some other twit and you just happen to believe it.