Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump goes off on 'dishonest' reporters who say he's slipping
Business Insider ^ | Sept 25, 2015 | Hunter Walker

Posted on 09/25/2015 3:42:22 PM PDT by Red Steel

Donald Trump has two words to describe a recent spate of articles that suggested he may be losing steam in the Republican presidential primary: "dishonest reporting."

"Very dishonest and the people understand that," Trump said in a conversation with Business Insider

...by CNN, Politico, and The Washington Post used recent polls from Quinnipiac and CNN/ORC to argue that the surge that propelled Trump to the head of the GOP pack may be ending....

CNN's Eric Bradner came in with a story of his own a few hours later. Bradner said the Quinnipiac poll "reinforce[d] a recent CNN/ORC poll that showed an ascendant Fiorina..."

That story was headlined, in part, "Donald Trump lead shrinks."

The Washington Post's Philip Bump was up next...the claim that "Donald Trump's slide in the polls is beginning to look real."

Business Insider reached out... Trump's campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said the media is motivated to diminish Trump's standing.

"Look, I think the media in general wants to have a narrative that this race is either tighter than it really is," Lewandowski said. "Or they want to propel other candidates into the forefront because they know that Mr...

"If you were any other candidate in this race, you would welcome the opportunity to have Mr. Trump's poll numbers," he said.

Trump and his team pointed to a slew of polls to dispute the notion that he's losing steam...

"It's dishonest reporting and — let me change it — it's knowingly dishonest," Trump said. "Because the polls speak for themselves. I'm up. Check out Zogby. Check out Reuters — the Reuters — what do they call that? The Reuters average..."

All of the polls show Trump well ahead...

In addition to these national numbers, ... Specifically, they identified an Iowa poll by PPP and a Sunshine State poll...

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; demagogicparty; election2016; memebuilding; newyork; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: MichaelCorleone
They are not covering his Oklahoma speech, hope there is no collusion to minimize his coverage
61 posted on 09/25/2015 6:13:58 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

Who are David, Lester, Scott, and Gwen? Like we’re supposed to understand some obscure reference to your peeps.


62 posted on 09/25/2015 6:59:54 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

RCP does NOT use all polls. They use their own criteria on which polls to use for averaging.


63 posted on 09/25/2015 7:07:29 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Do you know which other candidate running for 2016 nomination would not kill to get Trump’s number, even the 24 number which excludes many other polls with much higher numbers for Trump?

You think Bush would love to have 24?
Do you think Rubio would love 24?
Do you agree FioRino would kill for 24?
Would Cruz people be happy if Cruz was at 24?
Even Carson might break out in a high energy smile at 24.


64 posted on 09/25/2015 7:13:05 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

RCP does NOT use all polls. They use their own criteria on which polls to use for averaging.
++++
That is true.

But my experience is that they pick the best of the polls. While you very often see bias in the individual polls I’ve not detected that sort of thing with RCP. In fact the averaging of the polls tends to cancel out those biases.

I believe their criteria is based on an analysis of the polls for sample size, error margins and the makeup of the sample population.


65 posted on 09/25/2015 7:17:09 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Do you know which other candidate running for 2016 nomination would not kill to get Trump’s number, even the 24 number which excludes many other polls with much higher numbers for Trump?

You think Bush would love to have 24?
Do you think Rubio would love 24?
Do you agree FioRino would kill for 24?
Would Cruz people be happy if Cruz was at 24?
Even Carson might break out in a high energy smile at 24.


66 posted on 09/25/2015 7:22:50 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I’m not picking on Trump.

I’m just pointing out that his current poll numbers have been, for a relatively brief time, been higher than they are now. That’s just a fact. So I don’t understand why Trump is making such a fuss. Polls go up and down. Right now he’s down a bit. No big deal.


67 posted on 09/25/2015 7:27:48 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
higgmeister @62: Who are David, Lester, Scott, and Gwen?"

Those are the names given to the biggest piles of lying manure in the ABC-NBC-CBS-PBS cow pastures.

68 posted on 09/25/2015 7:47:07 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Fair enough.

First primary in Iowa (caucus) is 3+ months away. Anything can and will happen.


69 posted on 09/25/2015 7:56:59 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: Carl Vehse
higgmeister @62: Who are David, Lester, Scott, and Gwen?"

Those are the names given to the biggest piles of lying manure in the ABC-NBC-CBS-PBS cow pastures.

That makes me doubly glad that I don't even remember when I stopped watching the mainstream alphabet networks. I do wish I could remember when I quit smoking. That's something I wish I could celebrate.

71 posted on 09/26/2015 12:44:17 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson