"severe consequences" What is it this time? Blowing up their launch tower (in your dream?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...
2 posted on
09/19/2015 1:20:39 AM PDT by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Consequences? Send billions like Iraq?
4 posted on
09/19/2015 1:28:20 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: TigerLikesRooster
Is this like double-triple time-out bad-bad consequence, or like triple-super-bad-bad consequence?
If you wanted to really impress these guys...just say that you’ve invented some chemical that you can spray into the clouds above NK...that will make everyone into a trans person. Beam the message as far and wide as possible, and just let the VIPs figure out if the US is joking or serious.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Jong Un’s hard currency account must be running low again.
6 posted on
09/19/2015 1:36:55 AM PDT by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The Clinton administration REPEATIDLY promised that there would be no Nuclear North Korea. MAD-MAD Halfbrite and WENDY SHERMAN negotiated for the US from the State Dept. THEY TOTALLY FAILED. Now the NORKs threaten everybody in the region.
The Obama administration REPEATIDLY promised that there would be no Nuclear Iran. Hilliary Clinton and John Kerry and WENDY SHERMAN negotiated for the US from the State Dept. THEY TOTALLY FAILED. Now the Iranians threaten everybody in the region.
(To be read with an Elmer Fudd voice) The NORKs are weely, weely afwaid of John Kerry's thweats...
7 posted on
09/19/2015 1:37:47 AM PDT by
Netz
To: TigerLikesRooster
Next in O’s 4th quarter is normalization of relations with N. Korea.
8 posted on
09/19/2015 1:38:01 AM PDT by
ifinnegan
To: TigerLikesRooster
Severe consequences probably means a treaty that will give them everything they want with whipped cream on top.
9 posted on
09/19/2015 1:41:59 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Sanders/Cruz in 2016!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Kerry is gonna unfriend them on Facebook.
11 posted on
09/19/2015 1:51:48 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Obama to be slightly less flexible...”severe consequences”
To: TigerLikesRooster
(LEAD) N. Korea renews its vow to launch satellite(Kerry threatens "severe consequences")sKerry: "You keep this up, N. Korea, and we'll treat you just like Iran!"
To: TigerLikesRooster
"severe consequences"A nicely worded letter maybe?
14 posted on
09/19/2015 2:07:44 AM PDT by
Mark17
(Heaven, where the only thing there that's been made by man are the scars in the hands of Jesus)
To: TigerLikesRooster
What kind of satellites are they talking about launching that will make the world “tremble with fear”? Do they realize that today, even ham radio operators have their own satellites? Is his calendar stuck on 1957?
15 posted on
09/19/2015 2:30:15 AM PDT by
jmcenanly
("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
To: TigerLikesRooster
He'll hack into their one TV and radio network and force everyone to listen to him drone on and on ad nauseum in his pompous, monotone voice about how he served in Viet Nam.
They'll be jamming ice picks in their ears in no time.
17 posted on
09/19/2015 3:04:58 AM PDT by
uglybiker
(nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
If John Kerry’s spawn had married a north Korean, big John would carry a different tune.
18 posted on
09/19/2015 3:30:28 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(I thought Ethanol was the devil, now i find it is America is an Oligarchy)
To: TigerLikesRooster
severe consequences
What is it this time? Blowing up their launch tower (in your dream?)
No, it will be a 24 hour a day radio broadcast of the best of John Effin' Kerry's speeches, beginning with "Did You Know I Served In Vietnam?", concluding with "Three Purple Hearts for Three Purple Scratches".
That ought to scare those little NorK pricks into behaving.
20 posted on
09/19/2015 3:55:31 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(If you really support Ted Cruz, don't be trashing Trump, Cruz doesn't, why should you?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe Obama will draw a red line?
To: TigerLikesRooster
Kerry’s going to clamp a export controls on rum-soaked-raisins. None of Dear Terayza’s rum-raisins for Dear Leader. (The NK Dear Leader, he means, not our own Dear Leader, of course.)
22 posted on
09/19/2015 4:59:13 AM PDT by
samtheman
(2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/(Cruz or Palin))
To: TigerLikesRooster
7 year old little girls are not afraid of Lurch,
I don’t think them Norks are.
23 posted on
09/19/2015 5:06:55 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
24 posted on
09/19/2015 5:09:44 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
To: TigerLikesRooster
25 posted on
09/19/2015 5:20:24 AM PDT by
Jaxter
(Si vis pacem para bellum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
