Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kim Davis ORDERED released!
Fox news breaking ^ | 8 Sep 15

Posted on 09/08/2015 9:58:13 AM PDT by xzins

Just announced; awaiting article

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: courts; davidbunning; gaykkk; homosexualagenda; jailthejudge; kentucky; kimdavis; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; nowpunishthejudge; punishthejudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-322 next last
To: xzins

http://abc7ny.com/society/jailed-kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-to-be-released-ordered-not-to-interfere-with-marriage-licensing/974275/

This is a “good news/bad news” situation.


141 posted on 09/08/2015 10:27:04 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Doesn’t totally answer your question:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3222380/Kentucky-clerks-office-issues-marriage-licenses-gay-couple.html

Marriage licenses in Kentucky usually have the elected clerk’s signature on them; those handed out Friday lacked any signature. The Rowan County attorney and lawyers for the gay couples said they are legal and valid nevertheless.

When the judge was asked if the licenses will be considered valid without Davis’ authorization, he said it was up to the gay couples to take that chance.


142 posted on 09/08/2015 10:27:26 AM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

The statement on lacknof signatures came from her lawyer, was mentioned in several articles this weekend. On cell phone right now, can’t figure out how to pull them up and cut and paste. Can someone else pls help?


143 posted on 09/08/2015 10:27:27 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

If they’re being issued with no signature, then she is not violating her faith, but the authorities are violating the law.


144 posted on 09/08/2015 10:27:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

My guess is they’ll change the form.


145 posted on 09/08/2015 10:28:30 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
This was the appeals court right? If so, then that’s great news.

No, the trial judge.

146 posted on 09/08/2015 10:28:33 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

That’s because they live up to their book of rules for radicals.


147 posted on 09/08/2015 10:28:43 AM PDT by Old Sarge (I prep because DHS and FEMA told me it was a good idea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Aleya2Fairlie

Mortman mentioned that too.

Seems like this is no resolution to the problem.


148 posted on 09/08/2015 10:28:47 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Yes. This is a setup or Hizzonner didn’t want the public pressure and scrutiny. Any time I see a judge back off this quickly a little part of me wonders what they were doing that they did not want examined closely.


149 posted on 09/08/2015 10:29:32 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (The mill grinds exceedingly fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
This was the appeals court right? If so, then that’s great news.

No, the trial judge.

It is conceivable to me that the appeals court could have nudged the trial judge.

150 posted on 09/08/2015 10:29:41 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I don’t think he’ll fine her - she’s shown that jailing her has no effect & in fact, it showcases her beliefs. I think he’ll up the ante and start levying crippling fines intended to destroy her personally. The sodomite contingent wanted fines to start with, not jail.


151 posted on 09/08/2015 10:30:36 AM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Burkean; factoryrat

No, these are two separate issues.

In 1967, the feds were actually VALIDLY enforcing the 14A which forbids state segregation laws.

Here, the feds have NO constitutional authority whatsoever to interfere with state marriage laws or to meddle with marriage in any way.


152 posted on 09/08/2015 10:30:53 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican
He needs to be voted out of office at the first opportunity.

Federal judges are not elected.

153 posted on 09/08/2015 10:31:08 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bet the homonazis realized uh oh we went to far. Yeah we want pastors jailed too but this was making gays turn against us.

#Lovewins


154 posted on 09/08/2015 10:32:11 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
-- There are reports on Twitter that Davis will refuse release. They forced her into custody; They can force her out. --

Yes, she can refuse to abide by the conditions set out by the judge. Same effect.

155 posted on 09/08/2015 10:32:28 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This is from the NYT.
I’m not sure conservatives can really call this a win.
It looks like she was released because there’s no reason to hold her now that the licenses are being provided.

It will be interesting to see what Kim Davis does next.

From the Times article.

“In a two-page order issued Tuesday, the judge who sent her to jail, David L. Bunning of the Federal District Court, said he would release Ms. Davis because he was satisfied that her office was “fulfilling its obligation to issue marriage licenses to all legally eligible couples.”
In a two-page order issued Tuesday, the judge who sent her to jail, David L. Bunning of the Federal District Court, said he would release Ms. Davis because he was satisfied that her office was “fulfilling its obligation to issue marriage licenses to all legally eligible couples.”
Judge Bunning ordered that Ms. Davis “shall not interfere in any way, directly or indirectly, with the efforts of her deputy clerks to issue marriage licenses to all legally eligible couples.” He he said that any such action would be regarded as “a violation” of his released order.”


156 posted on 09/08/2015 10:32:39 AM PDT by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Fire the deputies who caved, but keep her son who stood by her.


157 posted on 09/08/2015 10:32:39 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Aleya2Fairlie
Her name is still affixed to the licenses.

OK, then hand out license forms with the space for the clerk's name either blacked out, or cut out with a razor blade. Will that make the form invalid? That is for the judge to render his opinion on.


158 posted on 09/08/2015 10:33:41 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Read about all the road blocks Washington DC used after losing District of Columbia v. Heller.

And which City of Washington DC official was jailed?


159 posted on 09/08/2015 10:34:17 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
If the licenses issued without her signature are invalid, then future divorce and estate proceedings might be complicated.

A fact that has escaped the notice of exactly ZERO divorce lawyers, anywhere. ;)

160 posted on 09/08/2015 10:36:05 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson