Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkean; factoryrat

No, these are two separate issues.

In 1967, the feds were actually VALIDLY enforcing the 14A which forbids state segregation laws.

Here, the feds have NO constitutional authority whatsoever to interfere with state marriage laws or to meddle with marriage in any way.


152 posted on 09/08/2015 10:30:53 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

“No, these are two separate issues.

In 1967, the feds were actually VALIDLY enforcing the 14A which forbids state segregation laws.

Here, the feds have NO constitutional authority whatsoever to interfere with state marriage laws or to meddle with marriage in any way.
**********************

Thank you for this reminder. I am shocked that I failed to see the distinction between the Constitutional Ammendment process and the dictate by decree that we have today. I almost failed to see that distinction....


202 posted on 09/08/2015 11:17:39 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216

Both cases reference the same two Constitutional authorities: Due Process and Equal Protection. The issue of legality within any one state’s laws is a conflict that has happened before.


245 posted on 09/08/2015 1:12:55 PM PDT by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson