Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawbreaker Kim Davis and the lawless Ted Cruz [WaPo Barf-worthy column]
Washington Post ^ | 09/05/2015 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 09/05/2015 6:30:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

What Kim Davis did was troubling. What Ted Cruz did was downright alarming.

Davis, a county clerk in Kentucky, refused to issue marriage certificates to gay couples. She said she was operating “under God’s authority,” but she now sits in jail for ignoring federal authority.

Davis, at least, is facing the consequences of her actions. Not so Cruz, senator from Texas and Republican presidential candidate.

“Today, judicial lawlessness crossed into judicial tyranny,” he said. “Today, for the first time ever, the government arrested a Christian woman for living according to her faith. . . . I stand with Kim Davis. Unequivocally.”

Tyranny? Our system of government gives the Supreme Court final say over constitutional matters, and, though Cruz doesn’t like it, the court ordered states to recognize same-sex marriages. In fact, the high court specifically declined to give relief to Davis, and the federal judge who ordered her jailed for contempt of court is a George W. Bush appointee and son of a former Republican senator.

Now Cruz, who took an oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution,” wants people to defy the Supreme Court’s authority? Who is the lawless one?

Cruz isn’t the only Republican candidate seeking the nation’s highest office while encouraging people to ignore its laws. Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, declared: “I thank God for Kim Davis, and I hope more Americans will stand with her.”

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, too, supported Davis, and Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) called her jailing “absurd” and said stands such as Davis’s are “an important part of the American way.” Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said that “you have the freedom to practice religious beliefs out there. It’s a fundamental right.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: District of Columbia; US: Kentucky; US: Louisiana; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; bobbyjindal; danamilbank; districtofcolumbia; election2016; gaykkk; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kentucky; kimdavis; lawlessness; libertarians; louisiana; medicalmarijuana; mikehuckabee; tedcruz; texas; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Jim Noble

The ginned-up “law” of an entity that was never charged with making law, only with answering questions about it.


21 posted on 09/05/2015 6:55:06 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Or looking at it another way, if the author really believes that, he’s five lawyers away from a world of hurt.


22 posted on 09/05/2015 6:56:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Really, guess none of them have heard of Dred Scott v. Sandford.


23 posted on 09/05/2015 6:57:08 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Tyranny? Our system of government gives the Supreme Court final say over constitutional matters, and, though Cruz doesn’t like it, the court ordered states to recognize same-sex marriages. In fact, the high court specifically declined to give relief to Davis, and the federal judge who ordered her jailed for contempt of court is a George W. Bush appointee and son of a former Republican senator. “

Congress has made no law on gay marriage


24 posted on 09/05/2015 6:57:29 AM PDT by Lera (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Tyranny? Our system of government gives the Supreme Court final say over constitutional matters, and, though Cruz doesn’t like it, the court ordered states to recognize same-sex marriages. In fact, the high court specifically declined to give relief to Davis, and the federal judge who ordered her jailed for contempt of court is a George W. Bush appointee and son of a former Republican senator. “

Congress has made no law on gay marriage


25 posted on 09/05/2015 6:57:32 AM PDT by Lera (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
From the article:

Defenders of Davis, a Democrat, cite President Obama’s “lawlessness” — but even his expansive view of presidential power doesn’t include ignoring court orders. They cite San Francisco’s “lawless” sanctuary-city statute — but the ordinance has survived 26 years without being invalidated.

By allowing this paragraph to remain in their article I can only assume they're supportive of the law breaking Sanctuary Cities.
26 posted on 09/05/2015 6:58:00 AM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sport

I think the founders would throw a fit, or more likely another revolution, if they saw headlines proclaiming that the Supreme Court had ‘legalized” this or that or the other thing, when they quite emphatically ceded no such authority to the judiciary. And that’s just the process side of things. If they saw the abominable, immoral, daily slaughter of little babies, or sodomites pretending to be “married,” they would become warlike quite quickly, I think. And they would be devastated that their posterity could have turned out to be so wicked and stupid.

“The propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which Heaven itself has ordained.”

— George Washington, 1789


27 posted on 09/05/2015 6:58:43 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Civil disobedience is fine when it advances liberal causes. But we're a "nation of laws" when the laws favor leftists.

Nothing more than the usual hypocrisy from the usual hypocrites.

28 posted on 09/05/2015 7:00:06 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox

And in fact that same crowd will never let you hear the end of the folly that was chattel slavery baked into the original Constitution (oh we know... it was those dastardly Christians who wished it in there... surely those noble Muslims would have never wanted it... barfffff).

And Cruz has a great point, why the sudden care here for the niceties of law.


29 posted on 09/05/2015 7:00:24 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Prohibition?

You might want to rethink that.


30 posted on 09/05/2015 7:00:39 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
We the people have the final say.

We the People.

And God.

31 posted on 09/05/2015 7:01:08 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

If only the supreme court has the ‘final say’ over constitutional matters, then our republican constitutional form of government with checks and balances has been completely overthrown. The oaths of the officers of the other branches and levels of government have become a cruel, deceptive charade.


32 posted on 09/05/2015 7:01:20 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

If only the supreme court has the ‘final say’ over constitutional matters, then our republican constitutional form of government with checks and balances has been completely overthrown. The oaths of the officers of the other branches and levels of government have become a cruel, deceptive charade.


33 posted on 09/05/2015 7:02:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You won’t find a bigger hypocrite about obeying the law than Milbank. Obama can run the most lawless regime in American history, and Milbank will totally ignore Obama’s lawlessness. But some clerk who obeys her religious beliefs is condemned to prison by the likes of Milbank.


34 posted on 09/05/2015 7:02:51 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Exactly.


35 posted on 09/05/2015 7:05:08 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Forces of hate have also done a pretty fair job of hounding the gospel to behind church doors.

Before ANY methods of order can begin to speak in their proper context, the love of God needs to be present and shared openly. Stifling this is the devil’s game, because then we can be as religious or even “biblical” as we want and yet achieve nothing.


36 posted on 09/05/2015 7:06:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Laziness is, I submit, a chief factor that has gotten America into bowling such a gutterball. A “let George do it” people will find that George is a monster.


37 posted on 09/05/2015 7:10:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Tyranny? Our system of government gives the Supreme Court final say over constitutional matters,

Really, just look at all the road blocks Washington DC used after losing District of Columbia v. Heller.

And which City of Washington DC official was jailed?

38 posted on 09/05/2015 7:10:23 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Tyranny? Our system of government gives the Supreme Court final say over constitutional matters,

If that's the case why are blacks no longer considered property?

39 posted on 09/05/2015 7:12:09 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No Kim Davis was operating under the laws of the State of KY which do not allow same sex marriage. To date those laws have not been changed by the KY legislature. She was also operating under the 10th Amendment which allows a state to nullify unconstitutional Federal laws.

The 5 activist lawyers in black robes who re-wrote the Constitution to force same sex marriage on 50 sovereign states are the bad actors in this melodrama.


40 posted on 09/05/2015 7:13:37 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson