Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I believe that the person he needs to "dialog" with has assumed room temperature.
1 posted on 08/27/2015 5:59:58 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

The very same morning here in Indy, a guy stabbed his wife, got in his car, drove downtown, and ran over 5 or 6 people in 5 different places.

Perhaps we should have a dialog on knives and driving vehicles.


29 posted on 08/27/2015 6:18:01 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"There needs to be some action that is taken out of an event like this -- out of an event like Sandy Hook, like Charleston, like Aurora, Colorado... where these things just don't occur anymore,"

Sandy Hook: guns banned by law. Charleston: concealed carry permit does NOT allow carry into churches. Aurora: the only theater in the vicinity which had a stated no-firearms policy. What these places had in common is that an ordinary citizen who was carrying a gun under the law would not be allowed in those three places. If you want to change something, start with that.

I have attempted to determine the gun policies at the Bridgewater Plaza, without success. If anyone can point me to whether guns were allowed or prohibited there, I'd appreciate it.

30 posted on 08/27/2015 6:18:33 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thank you.


32 posted on 08/27/2015 6:19:00 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

His fifteen minutes are over.


35 posted on 08/27/2015 6:21:02 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He could have killed them with a knife, rock or pointy stick. I’m sorry for your loss. Dialog over.


37 posted on 08/27/2015 6:21:39 PM PDT by Theophilus (Be as prolific as you are pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Would it make him feel any better if they had been hacked to death with an axe?
40 posted on 08/27/2015 6:23:06 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Could have been just as easy to kill both people with a large knife.”

There’s your dialogue, Chris.


41 posted on 08/27/2015 6:24:33 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

See, when I hear crap like this coming out of victims family members mouths I lose all respect for them. Im sorry for his loss I really am, this reporter she seemed like a really nice woman, I checked out her twitter feed, a nice young woman, had her whole life ahead of her, but don’t use her death to take away MY right to protect myself. The same liberals who have a beef about labeling ALL Muslims terrorists and labeling ALL blacks thugs have no problem labeling all gun owners evil when a nut does something terrible


42 posted on 08/27/2015 6:27:12 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fine. You can’t have my guns, you cannot restrict my rights. Dialog over.


43 posted on 08/27/2015 6:28:07 PM PDT by vpintheak (Man up and bring it politicians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

After we’ve killed 55 million kids in this country, and enshrined it as a “constitutional right” that is more fundamental than the rights actually named in the constitution ... he thinks guns are the reason life is cheapened?


45 posted on 08/27/2015 6:31:51 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Perhaps a little more interest in relative’s mental health might help. In just about all these cases the family had inklings that something was off with their kin.

If one of my kids or a family member or even a person I regularly come in contact with espoused the kinds of things that would lead me to believe he or she could become violent or do something like that I would certainly do what I could to prevent that. Whether that means I contact the police or mental health folks or what I can’t say, but I would for sure make sure their access to weapons be restricted.

But in these cases to date it appears the family has washed their hands of the person. The result is a mass shooting, or some other violent act.

No additional laws will get those in regular contact to do the right thing.


46 posted on 08/27/2015 6:33:12 PM PDT by msrngtp2002 (Just my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“We need to have a substantive conversation...”

I know someone who lost a loved one by the violent act of a disturbed individual. She was deluged with invitations from the media, including personal messages from celebrity tv hosts, even a movie offer. Over twenty years have passed and she still hasn’t hit the airwaves to say anything at all, never mind “We need to have a substantive conversation...”

Going into seclusion and experiencing shock and grief in private, is that now an antiquated practice? How does anyone say that less than 24hrs after a fiancee is murdered?


48 posted on 08/27/2015 6:34:14 PM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Sorry your girlfriend got shot...I truly am, but gun laws aren’t the problem. Maybe we should look into the issue of crazy black fags getting to walk around with the rest of as if they were normal.


49 posted on 08/27/2015 6:37:27 PM PDT by pgkdan (But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yes let's have a dialogue over gun violence, he does realize more people are killed in automobile accidents than gun violence. He should work for the State Department; that is their solution for the guys that cut off heads; if only they had jobs
51 posted on 08/27/2015 6:41:46 PM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Once people start looking to take my rights away, they lose any and all sympathy from me. In fact, they become my enemy.


52 posted on 08/27/2015 6:41:58 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am sorry for their loss. She seems like a very nice person. But within hours, both the boyfriend and father have made this into a gun control issue. They go from one television interview to the next. The father rattled off the ones he’s doing tomorrow.

We haven’t seen the cameraman’s family or his fiancé. I imagine they are too broken up to run to the cameras.


53 posted on 08/27/2015 6:43:03 PM PDT by FR_addict (Boehner needs to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It was just “workplace violence”, right Barry? Barry?

Or was it the guy making the video? Hillary? Comment?


54 posted on 08/27/2015 6:43:05 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

maybe he should dialogue about racism after all the reporter was accused of racism and we know that no one would cry racism if it wasn’t true. /S


55 posted on 08/27/2015 6:46:39 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How about ask why current laws aren’t enforced? And why the TV station did not get a protective order issued against this guy? They did require him to seek mental health counseling or face termination.

“Vice-President Biden said, “And to your point, Mr. Baker, regarding the lack of prosecutions on lying on Form 4473s, we simply don’t have the time or manpower to prosecute everybody who lies on a form, that checks a wrong box, that answers a question inaccurately.” That’s right: Biden said the administration just doesn’t have time to prosecute crimes (felonies punishable by up to a 10-year prison sentence) under existing laws, but is proposing a host of sweeping new laws.”

Nothing has changed in enforcement since this thread:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2980073/posts


57 posted on 08/27/2015 6:48:14 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How about a dialog on racism instead, he wanted to start a race war...and he used a gun.


60 posted on 08/27/2015 6:51:06 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson