Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump’s Plan for Your Taxes Might Be EXACTLY What He Needs to Win the White House
Conservative Tribune ^ | 5AUG2015 | Staff Writer

Posted on 08/10/2015 7:13:51 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine

The liberal media has been going absolutely berserk over Donald Trump’s remarks on immigration. However, they are ignoring his stances on other issues, some of which are very insightful.

In his book, “Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again,” published in 2011, Donald Trump laid out a plan to transform America’s tax code, and it is beautiful.

Trump’s code, which he calls the “1-5-10-15 income tax plan,” is a simplistic way to fix our nation’s broken taxation system, without putting the strain on any particular group of people.

Under Trump’s tax plan, those making up to…

$30,000 per year will pay 1 percent in federal income taxes $30,000 to $100,000 will pay 5 percent $100,000 to $1 million will pay 10 percent $1 million or above will pay 15 percent “It’s clear and fair,” wrote Trump on his tax plan. “Best of all, it can be filled out on the back of a postcard and will save Americans big bucks on accountants and massive amounts of time wasted attempting to decipher the tax code.”

Trump also wrote, “Imagine your paycheck was 40 percent higher than it currently is. What could you do with 40 percent more wealth? How many jobs and opportunities for others could you create?”

“The longer you really think about it the madder you will get,” he wrote, “especially when you consider the waste, fraud, and abuse the federal government traffics in as it inflicts its self-defeating policies on hard-working Americans.”

Trump’s rhetoric on taxes continues to this day. On CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Trump stated that he tries to pay as little tax as possible.

“I fight like hell to pay as little as possible, for two reasons. Number one, I am a businessman, and that’s the way you are supposed to do it. And you put the money back in your company and employees and all of that.”

He also added, “But the other reason is that I hate the way our government spends our taxes. I hate the way they waste our money, trillions and trillions of dollars of waste and abuse. And I hate it.” (H/T WND)

Trump’s proposed tax plan is fair and shows real promise at fixing what has arguably become America’s biggest headache. It doesn’t tax the poor to the point of bankruptcy, and it doesn’t punish the rich for being successful.


TOPICS: Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; newyork; taxes; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: ballearthout

You seem to have missed the point.


81 posted on 08/10/2015 9:18:51 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
The biggest opposition is likely to come from the real estate and construction lobbies, who have successfully convinced a lot of Americans that it’s in their best interest to borrow beyond their means to purchase houses because the interest is tax deductible.

If you can afford the payments, it is not beyond your means. If you tried to save to make a cash purchase of a home, you'd be paying rent to someone else and have less to put away. A mortgage is a win-win for MOST people; you get a residence and a writeoff and the bankers make a buck.

82 posted on 08/10/2015 9:22:45 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

No different than now.


83 posted on 08/10/2015 9:24:15 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Howabout paying all 20% of taxes to the state, and let the states pass on the fed portion to the fed.


84 posted on 08/10/2015 9:29:15 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Works for me!


85 posted on 08/10/2015 9:38:29 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

There is no reason why interest on a home mortgage should be deductible when interest on other loans is not. It’s crony capitalism for one sector of the economy. I do think it needs to be phased out gradually for those who are current mortgage holders though.


86 posted on 08/10/2015 9:51:10 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (Life's a bitch. Don't elect one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Likely you would pay 5% on the first $100,000 and 15% on the income over that. Similar to the tax code now.

But, IMO the 5% 30k-100k , the bulk of taxpayers would not collect enough money. Everyone should be paying something.


87 posted on 08/10/2015 9:53:35 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

While it sounds good on paper there’s the reality of DC. The tax code is deliberately complicated so that member of Congress can reward donators, lobbyists and significant businesses in their districts and states. Loopholes are their method of saying “I fought for you”, no loopholes, no fighting for you, no buying votes.


88 posted on 08/10/2015 9:56:54 AM PDT by discostu (It always comes down to cortexiphan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

A downturn in housing affects other market segments. Appliances, carpet and flooring, paint, landscaping...


89 posted on 08/10/2015 10:06:37 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Incidentally, I have not run the numbers to determine if this is revenue neutral..... but shouldn’t that be analyzed and shouldn’t the media take a good, solid look at it?

So you do away with business taxes, capital gains taxes, and inheritance taxes, then you slash income taxes to these levels and you honestly think there is a chance that it'd be revenue neutral? My expectation is that it would cut federal tax revenue considerably. So what is Trump going to do about cutting spending enough to balance the budget?

90 posted on 08/10/2015 10:12:02 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
"How many jobs and opportunities for others could you create?”

I don't know. How many?

91 posted on 08/10/2015 10:13:12 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
So?? That does not provide any reason why housing should receive preferential treatment in the tax code over any other sector of the economy.

If we are going to have a flat (or almost flat) tax system as supposedly advocated by Trump, we need to have a true fill-it-out on a postcard system where no one gets any deductions for anything whatever.

92 posted on 08/10/2015 10:13:51 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (Life's a bitch. Don't elect one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Unfortunately Trump is advocating none of that.


93 posted on 08/10/2015 10:16:55 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
However, his reputation was ruined after he engineered a massive accounting scandal at Sunbeam-Oster.

In retrospect you probably should have left that part about the "massive accounting scandal" out of it.

94 posted on 08/10/2015 10:18:07 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: expat2
Nothing wrong with it not being revenue neutral. We need to starve the beast.

Yeah who cares about all that deficit spending anyway? President Trump will just declare bankrupcy, wipe most of it out, and start the process over again as he's done four times before. Oh wait...

95 posted on 08/10/2015 10:20:10 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Correct. The point is that everyone pays something.

Interesting that under these rates most folks would pay more to F.I.C.A. than Federal Income tax.

The other point is eliminating corporate taxes and imposing meaningful tariffs. That would trigger massive capital repatriation inflows as well as "insourcing" jobs back to the U.S.

The key point, however is to restore taxation to its intended purpose of revenue generation rather than as a tool for influence-peddling. Most the lobbyists that infest D.C. are there to plead for special favors in the tax code. They can all look for real jobs.

96 posted on 08/10/2015 10:23:10 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

At least one!


97 posted on 08/10/2015 10:25:10 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

You put more money in the pockets of the American what do you think might happen?


98 posted on 08/10/2015 10:26:07 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Our government at one time did not take care of people like this. People took care of people.

You think the government can love your child or your relative better than you?


99 posted on 08/10/2015 10:27:58 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
You put more money in the pockets of the American what do you think might happen?

They'll spend some of it. And?

100 posted on 08/10/2015 10:33:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson