Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump Considering Taking Pledge Not to Run as Third-Party Candidate
ABC News/Good Morning America ^ | 8/10/15 | Jon Karl

Posted on 08/10/2015 6:54:04 AM PDT by tellw

Donald Trump may soon do what Republican leaders have been asking the billionaire candidate to do -- pledge not to run as an independent candidate for president, a senior Trump adviser told ABC News.

Trump refused to take that pledge at the start of Thursday's GOP debate but is now seriously considering promising not to run as an independent if he does not win the Republican nomination, the adviser said.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; johnbrowdie; newyork; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last
To: tellw

tRump might promise to not run as a third party candidate.

Fortunately for tRump, he could make that pledge and run as a democrat.

tRump could use the positions he held a couple of weeks ago too (pro-abortion, pro-Kelo, pro-Obamacare, etc)


61 posted on 08/10/2015 7:53:57 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Trump should have thrown the ? back at the other candidates! “Will all of you support me if I win the nomination?”

Would any of them raised their hands?

That should be the first question of the next debate.


62 posted on 08/10/2015 7:54:19 AM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tellw

If he’s considering said pledge, it’s because the GOPe has caved. This dovetails with the talk of Trump speaking with Ailes about appearing on Fox tonight.


63 posted on 08/10/2015 7:54:52 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

A lot of folks really don’t care if Trump ran in the Man-in-the-Moon party, he is the loudest voice in favor of what they want.

The American system of electing presidents is what has destined it to this oligarchy of parties. In a lot of European countries they do coalitions and runoffs so as to resolve situations where all parties polled less than a majority. Not so our present Constitution.


64 posted on 08/10/2015 7:55:18 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5

Anecdotally, I see posters on this forum and others who are so sick of the GOP they actually want them to lose the election so that the GOP will stop taking their votes for granted. They harken back to the Perot days, but think that Trump is a much better candidate than Perot. It’s just become such a comedy that the Democrats are just sitting by and allowing us to eat each other for lunch. With friends like this...


65 posted on 08/10/2015 7:55:52 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
...but he should reiterate that he won't bolt if he's treated fairly in the primary process.

On a subject that seems to bring out worst, intellectually, in conservatives, this sentence fragment is quite insightful. You are right. He needs to turn around the "requests for a pledge", and use it to highlight what the GOPe has done in the past. He should use the question itself as an opening to an explanation on, for example, what happened in Mississippi. If he did so, not only will people understand why he is resistant to a pledge, but they will also further understand quite how evil the GOPe is.
66 posted on 08/10/2015 7:56:15 AM PDT by jjsheridan5 (The next Ronald Reagan will not be a Republican, but rather a former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kidd

He’d have to do a little explaining to Democrats, however, why he came out so loudly in favor of goring their sacred ox.

Not that they are so slow to forgive if you are going to suddenly prove a huge advantage to them.


67 posted on 08/10/2015 7:57:43 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Trump could take the pledge then violate it once it becomes convenient for him to do so.

But, then, we all know Trump would never say one thing & do another when it becomes convenient....

68 posted on 08/10/2015 7:58:04 AM PDT by gdani (No sacred cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
This is the August in the year before the election, and that "Democratic front-runner," after enormous hype is already barely retaining her "front-runner," status.

As for the idea of a third party non-politician? First of all, how do you just assume it will be a non-politician. It could well be a disenchanted Democrat or Republican. But with the general and growing contempt for the Washington crowd, a non-politician might well have the advantage.

Ross Perot, of course, was what you describe, and even with his inability to use the television address, correctly, was on the verge of making it a roughly equal three way race in 1992, before he had a paranoid incident, pulled out, and then reentered. He still got 19% of the vote, however.

Someone who understands how to use the TV address, as FDR--forget for the moment the wrong-headed policies--used the radio fire-side address--might win by a landslide.

69 posted on 08/10/2015 7:59:08 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: tellw

Trump shouldn’t be trusted, regardless. The guy is out for number #1 and that is himself. He needs to be defeated quickly.


70 posted on 08/10/2015 8:01:34 AM PDT by justice14 ("Christ is Victorious" / @rjustice21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
"Trump knows that if he runs an an independent he will not win. He will only split the vote between Republican voters and the Democrat will win. Currently the Democrats have bought most of the voters, including illegals, and it is just too close. No matter who wins the Republican nomination we must tuck in pride and all vote for that person if necessary."

A Jeb Bush win is not a victory. The open tide Bush border and mass amnesty would end the country just as much as a Rat victory.

71 posted on 08/10/2015 8:01:57 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: justice14

Every effort to defeat him seems to blow up in the face of those who mount it.

America won’t be denied.


72 posted on 08/10/2015 8:02:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Which is sad, as he is a liberal. He will start to decline. Little by little.


73 posted on 08/10/2015 8:06:11 AM PDT by justice14 ("Christ is Victorious" / @rjustice21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tellw

The fascist media wants to keep the lie going that there is a substantive difference between the GOPe and the Dims. For them, ideally, the Dims would be in control with the GOPe as the fake foil/useful idiots. A 3rd party run would expose this charade and would most likely destroy the GOPe.

Even if Trump declines to run, we need a 3rd party candidate if we get someone like fatso, jebbush, or rino rubio.


74 posted on 08/10/2015 8:06:45 AM PDT by grumpygresh (We don't have Democrats and Republicans, we have the Faustian uni-party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Ridiculous. Trump has been moving right at least since 2000, when he contested the Reform Party nomination with Pat Buchanan. No, he was not as far right as Buchanan, but he was moving in that direction.

If we are not willing to welcome intelligent & vocal people, who are/and have been waking up, into the Conservative ranks, we have become as Lemmings hurling ourselves over the cliff to our destruction.

I have been fighting as a hard-nosed Conservative since High School, and I give thanks to God every day for men like Trump & Cruz, who are stepping into the breach for America in her greatest time of need, since the victory at Yorktown. Stop misrepresenting the evidence.

75 posted on 08/10/2015 8:06:53 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

“Please explain how that will help yourself or teach Fox some kind of lesson.”

I will. There are these things called “ratings”. They’re done by counting the numbers of people who watch a given program or network and they seem to be very important to the organizations that sponsor the airtime. Each number is an individual household. Every household who clicks on a certain network or program is helping boost the ratings of said network or program. Every household that does not click on said network or program is doing nothing to further the agenda, ratings or perception of them. It’s very like what voting in an election used to be. Some people find that gratifying, especially since said network or program might offend their most valued principles.

Refusing to watch Fox helps me in many ways. It makes me feel good to deprive them of my support in any small way that I can. It also prevents blood from coming out of my “whatever” from watching the scum pat themselves on the back and skew the politics of an American election.

My one opinion and refusal to watch, however small, is joined by thousands and thousands of others who will make the same decision. This, hopefully, will teach Fox some kind of lesson. If it doesn’t, then the Devil and Liberals can take them.


76 posted on 08/10/2015 8:08:22 AM PDT by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Maybe Ross Perot is available!


77 posted on 08/10/2015 8:11:42 AM PDT by Ditter ( God Bless Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: tellw

They are trying to come up with some way they can control Trump. Since, they are unable to get him to step out of the race or smear him in order to make his numbers drop.

Trump doesn’t need them. Except, irronically IN NAME ONLY..:)


78 posted on 08/10/2015 8:14:22 AM PDT by Leep (Still living in what remains of 'God's Country'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justice14

Some people are actually WISHING he would not realize that he has come across a mother lode of empowerment, and respect it. You sound like you are among them.


79 posted on 08/10/2015 8:14:37 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

“Great. Enjoy Hillary or Bernie. You’ll have yourself to thank for it. This is big boy politics, not some rebellious teen acting out.”

Why not Cruz? You think if Trump backs out the election is over?


80 posted on 08/10/2015 8:15:07 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats are parasites. It really is that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson