Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Counter: Ted Cruz Not Natural Born Citizen [Team Trump!]
Twitter | August 6, 2015 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 08/08/2015 4:02:21 AM PDT by z taxman



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; anncoulter; capitulatingcanadian; coulter; cruz2016; cruzbirthers; donaldtrump; election2016; gaykkk; homosexualagenda; libertarians; mediatrollop; medicalmarijuana; naturalborncitizen; newyork; stormtrumpers; tedcruz; texas; trump; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-224 next last
To: Reagan Disciple
Former Chistie/Romney gal now on board with the former Democrat/Independent/whatever will make me the most money post primary candidate.

Yup.


141 posted on 08/08/2015 10:12:57 AM PDT by South40 (“Florida Governor Jeb Bush is a good man,” ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

No, I don’t think Yoda is on Trumps payroll.
“hypocrisy”?

Ok fair enough. I’ll label you as obstinate. You’ll probably take that as an insult too.


142 posted on 08/08/2015 10:13:39 AM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

“Just when you think Ann has her head on straight again.”

Exactly. It’s hard to understand how someone that skinny can keep stepping in ****. She must have big feet.
Her latest book is good, but she keeps doing gunpowder straws and shooting off her mouth. Ann—stop removing all doubt!


143 posted on 08/08/2015 10:13:54 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: z taxman
This isn't the first time that I've disagreed with her.

Ted Cruz - 2016

144 posted on 08/08/2015 10:14:24 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; HannibalThaddeusBeauregardIV
Trump hasn’t denied it, noob.

Not only has liberal Trump not dened it speaking to his favorite president, he has admitted it.

145 posted on 08/08/2015 10:18:57 AM PDT by South40 ("Florida Governor Jeb Bush is a good man," ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Ann, hillary and barry are the enemy, not Cruz


146 posted on 08/08/2015 10:23:32 AM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CaptainKip
Sure....

natural born Citizens: Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz

Yes Ted Cruz Is Eligible To Be President

147 posted on 08/08/2015 10:24:51 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Slambat

Those that buy can most suredly be brought.


148 posted on 08/08/2015 10:25:02 AM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: CaptainKip
Oh, and if you didn't see this one posted by Jim, here it is:

Editorial: Ted Cruz and the ‘birther’ issue

Tell Jim that Coulter (who I used to like) is right....

149 posted on 08/08/2015 10:29:33 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

I see that Ted Cruz got like 5 standing ovations during his Red State speech today.


150 posted on 08/08/2015 10:35:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Here’s Ted Cruz at Redstate this morning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-788IyQ4uYM

41 minutes


151 posted on 08/08/2015 10:39:27 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
My memory is that Franklin was born in France.

Franklin was born in Boston. He represented the US in France during the Revolution.

Hamilton had been born outside the US on the island of St. Kitts. I suppose he was constitutionally eligible to be president because he had been serving in the army during the Revolution and was living in the country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, but he had so many enemies that he wouldn't have been elected.

For what it is worth, I would trust the research of Cruz before I would Coulter.

Ann has been talking about this for some time. But she's been erratic. Sometimes she says she says Cruz is ineligible. Sometimes she says she doesn't know. Once she tweeted that he was eligible. But surely Ted Cruz can't be the judge in this matter. He has a personal interest in the outcome.

152 posted on 08/08/2015 10:57:13 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
If Obama can be President...... who can’t?..

This is my position. Obama broke the requirement, so now there is no actual requirement. Any sort of US Citizenship acquired at birth is good enough.

153 posted on 08/08/2015 11:18:22 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
His glib assertion that there a two types of citizens, citizens-by-birth and naturalized citizens ignores the fact that there is more than one type of citizen-by-birth; there is also more than one type of 'naturalized' citizen.

Although I agree with where you are going with this, I am going to give you a bit of advice. The management here has little patience for any critique of Cruz's birth status, so I am suggesting you might want to tread very lightly here.

I've known several posters who went where you are going and they can no longer post on this website.

My position on the topic is that I don't care. The Democrats broke the rules, so we don't have to abide by them either.

Ted Cruz is one of my two favorite potential choices, (The Other being Scott Walker) and I don't care if he is technically qualified or not.

As Lincoln Said:

I did understand however, that my oath to preserve the constitution to the best of my ability, imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government -- that nation -- of which that constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the constitution? By general law life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful, by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the constitution, through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that, to the best of my ability, I had even tried to preserve the constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together.

154 posted on 08/08/2015 11:26:02 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Slambat
What defines a “natural-born citizen” and where do you find it. The federalist papers? Blacks Law Dictionary?

The Declaration of Independence. Anyone born prior to the Declaration of Independence was a British Subject, and was thereafter converted to an American Citizen by the action of the Declaration of Independence. (Unless they chose to remain loyal to the British Government, which many did.)

Anyone born after to an American Father was a "natural born citizen."

155 posted on 08/08/2015 11:29:50 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
I researched various sources, read the constitution and I've concluded in my own mind that if one parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of the baby's birth, regardless of where the kid was born, they are a U.S. citizen.

You didn't research it enough. Women couldn't transfer citizenship until after the Cable Act in 1922. Prior to that, only the father could transfer citizenship.

156 posted on 08/08/2015 11:33:43 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: z taxman
I really like Ann Coulter, but she's WRONG !


157 posted on 08/08/2015 11:37:10 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Video - https://www.dropbox.com/s/xl8rryik2smv4uc/Cruz1.mp4?dl=0


158 posted on 08/08/2015 11:38:33 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
'What defines a “natural-born citizen” and where do you find it. The federalist papers? Blacks Law Dictionary?'

You start with the "Declaration of Independence", which is what created US Citizenship, and you look at the natural law philosophies underpinning it.

I'll give you a hint. Out of all the Natural Law philosophers consulted by the Founders in the lead up to creating the United States, only one of them argues that breaking away from a kingdom and forming an independent Republic is morally correct.

In fact, there is only one natural law philosopher of that era that even mentions the concept of Independence. All other writers of Natural law would have been arrested had they suggested such an idea because every one of them lived in a nation where a King ruled. Writing such a thing would have been regarded by the King as sedition.

Only one natural law philosopher could suggest Independence, because he lived in a nation that did not have a King. It was the only nation in the World without a King. Here's another hint. :)


159 posted on 08/08/2015 11:40:42 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
What defines a “natural-born citizen” are the U.S. citizenship laws in effect at the time of your birth.

This is incorrect. The meaning of "natural born citizen" cannot be redefined by congress. They can't make it mean something new.

It's meaning is set in stone, and it means the exact same thing as it did in 1787 when it was made a requirement.

And let me be clear, "natural born citizen" predates the US Constitution because that condition was created by the Declaration of Independence. Anyone born prior to the Declaration of Independence was a British Subject. Those born after, (to an American father) was a "natural born citizen."

160 posted on 08/08/2015 11:44:32 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson