REPORT: Navy to Charge Officer Who Fired on Islamist During Chattanooga Terror Attack

The Gateway Pundit ^ | August 1, 2015 | Jim Hoft

[abb]

Haven't seen this posted.

[afraidfortherepublic]

Outrageous.

[Beave Meister]

FUBAR

[FreedomStar3028]

This can’t possibly be true. Satire?

[Diogenesis]

Hasan and Bergdahl agree.

[ChicagahAl]

What has happened in our America...?

Democrats happened.

[FreedomStar3028]

This story smells like BS. Total and utter BS.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Of course they’re going to charge him, can’t have infidels defending themselves........./s

[skeeter]

Obama does have a record of persecuting US military personnel for defending themselves.

He got 3x the number of our guys killed in Afghanistan than the previous president with his ROE.

[DoughtyOne]

But rather than being celebrated as a hero, Lt. Commander White may be charged for discharging a firearm on federal property.

Anyone associated with these charges and advancing them along, should be given an immediate reason to find new employment.

Maybe the Mosque down the road is hiring.

[abb]

http://allenbwest.com/2015/08/whats-happening-to-this-heroic-navy-officer-from-the-chattanooga-shooting-will-make-your-blood-boil/

[FlingWingFlyer]

Pentagon insanity on parade. Obonzo’s “fundamentally transformed” Amerika really sucks! When attacked by Islamoterrorists, it is your duty as an American, to NOT FIGHT BACK TO DEFEND YOURSELF! Obonzo can KMA!

[tumblindice]

http://www.infowars.com/report-navy-to-charge-officer-who-fired-on-islamist-during-chattanooga-terror-attack/

[MistrX]

Evidently Commander White is not black.

[TYVets]

If it wasn't for him that muzzie would still be alive.

[Da Coyote]

When is our military going to say, “ENOUGH”?

[BobL]

Opening for ANY REPUBLICAN...if they have the gonads.

Don’t be surprised if Trump quickly nails it, yet again, here. While the others wait for their ‘advisers’ (most of them gay, by the way) to tell them how they should respond.

[SuperLuminal]

If true, another obamshitsky W-T-F moment!

[Windflier]

The U.S. Navy owes me a new mind. They just blew the only one I have.

[ASOC]

Sorry folks - I’m going to back the Navy on this one.

Federal Law is crystal clear on this one.
18 U.S. Code § 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities.

How many other times had this Officer violated the law *prior* to this shooting will likely be the focus of the Article 32 hearing if I were to guess....

The only exceptions are for :
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.

See also
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/521056p.pdf
DoD Directive 5210.56.

At least he’s alive to stand before the Court.