Posted on 07/24/2015 6:18:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Donald Trump, a 2016 Republican presidential candidate, said Friday he sometimes identifies more as a Democrat when pressed to explain previous statements that the economy generally does better under Democrats than Republicans.
"I identify with some things as a Democrat," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" when pressed about the comments from 2004, adding that "generally speaking" he was "never a Bush fan."
You are absolutely correct. People here are missing the fact that this interview took place on MSNBC.
"Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe"
Where we must reject "pragmatism," is when it is misapplied to advocate compromising basic principles. Trump's retrospective on the 2008 Crash, does not do that. It is an outreach that compromises nothing but the reputation of a very, very flawed--ideologically--Bush II second term.
Im so glad Cruz doesn’t refer to fellow Republicans as being in a looney bin camp,,
that’s so condescending,,you really do feel superior don’t you?
I would agree. But you gotta admit, that ain’t saying much :-(
A Cruz Sanders debate would be one for the ages; both of these guys actually understand and believe what they are saying. It would also get about a .05 percent viewership.
The GOP nominees in 1992 and 1996 were George Bush and Bob Dole, neither of whom had the slightest interest in pushing a "conservative agenda." Both candidates were on the same page as Bill Clinton on most issues, especially fiscal and foreign policy. Even if the dubious claim that Perot helped elect Clinton were true (i.e. that's assuming that Perot voters would have mostly voted for Bush or Dole otherwise, which is doubtful), I can't get too outraged about it because I don't see much of a difference between a Bush/Dole Presidency vs. a Clinton Presidency.
Except for Cruz being a secret trade deal NWO Globalist and a Patriot Act fascist I agree.
Yep, you must plow the fields with the oxen God gave you.
Let me state again that I am leaning towards Ted Cruz. But I really have been thanking God every recent day for the Donald Trump phenomenon.
And as stated, in several threads, Trump has already rendered the Jeb Bush promotion irrelevant.
In which part of your 3/10 reside Trump’s support of abridging property rights (Kelo) and “universal” (read: single-payer) health care? Would that be the part in which you agree with those stances or that in which you don’t care?
I'm also somewhat taken aback to the blind devotion to Trump from some of his fans here - you can point to statements from the horse's mouth that show that Trump is an opportunist without any commitment to conservative issues, and it doesn't matter.
However, there is a bright side to Trump's following. He put the issue of amnesty and illegal immigration at the forefront, something which no other GOP candidate was willing to do (the rest are mostly either mealy-mouthed or on the wrong side of the issue). The groundswell of support for Trump's anti-amnesty, anti-illegal position proves that there's a real grassroots movement that wants something done about illegals, which will hopefully force the GOP to address the issue.
Even if Trump's anti-illegal position is insincere, the anti-illegal stance of his many supporters is sincere.
The Trump Effect is allowing Cruz to surge against the Milquetoasts, and more people learn that Cruz has all of the good things Trump does, without the baggage.
RE: A Cruz Sanders debate would be one for the ages; both of these guys actually understand and believe what they are saying.
I was thinking about that earlier. It would be an quite an interesting contrast in ideologies. One I hope our side would easily win ...but the way this country is headed I'm not so sure anymore.
Trump is wavering on his anti-amnesty stance. Now he is talking about allowing those with “merit” to stay. Trump has embarked on an Hispanic outreach tack. He must be feeling the heat.
Ditter,
The blindness on this site when it comes to Trump is staggering...we are seeing it nationally too.
If people would take the time to HONESTLY listen to Trump...they’d discover that he rambles, never answers questions and hasn’t explained WHY is he is a Republican or has been only since 2012.
He might have good intentions, but many of us have warned that he could be a plant.
Build the wall first, then we’ll go from there.
Cruz is the only other GOP candidate who has been fairly consistently opposed to amnesty, but he didn't talk much about it. Trump put the illegal immigration at center stage, and in response, Cruz has been talking about immigration more in the past weeks than he's said in past years.
So even if Trump's newfound opposition to illegal immigration is fake and opportunistic (which I think it is), it serves a useful purpose by putting one of the most important issues facing this country center-stage. Even though Trump is the wrong messenger, the message is right.
how? he has always said, wall first, illegals alien issue second. (like many here I might add)
We need to focus on first things first. Build the wall. That is what got Reagan. He gave them amnesty with a promise of a wall. no wall to date.
Lets reverse that. A REAL wall with a promise of reform. Let gridlock take care of reform.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.