Posted on 07/14/2015 2:41:10 PM PDT by NYer
.- The Little Sisters of the Poor have reiterated their commitment to following their conscience as they care for the poor and dying, following a federal appeals court ruling that they must obey the federal contraception mandate.
“As Little Sisters of the Poor, we simply cannot choose between our care for the elderly poor and our faith,” said Mother Provincial Sr. Loraine Marie Maguire.
“And we should not have to make that choice, because it violates our nation’s commitment to ensuring that people from diverse faiths can freely follow God’s calling in their lives. For over 175 years, we have served the neediest in society with love and dignity. All we ask is to be able to continue our religious vocation free from government intrusion.”
Sr. Maguire responded to a Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling against the Little Sisters of the Poor on July 14.
The sisters are among several hundred plaintiffs that have challenged the federal contraception mandate, which requires employers to offer health insurance plans covering contraception, sterilization and some drugs that can cause early abortions.
Employers who fail to comply with the mandate face crippling penalties. In the case of the Little Sisters, the fines could amount to around $2.5 million a year, or about 40 percent of the $6 million the Sisters beg for annually to run their ministry.
Met with a wave of protest, the contraception mandate has undergone a number of revisions. However, the sisters say that it still requires them to violate their beliefs.
Because the Little Sisters of the Poor are not affiliated with a particular house of worship, they do not qualify for the religious exemption to the mandate. The federal government has argued that it has sufficiently provided for the religious freedom of the Little Sisters and other religious organizations through an “accommodation” under which the faith-based employers can pass the burden of providing the objectionable coverage to insurers, who must then offer it directly to employees without cost.
The government says that providing contraception coverage is ultimately free for insurance companies, because birth control results in better health for women and lower pregnancy rates, resulting in lower overall costs for insurers.
Critics, however, reject this claim, arguing that the costs of the coverage will ultimately be handed on to the employer in some way. Several religious organizations have also said that they still object to signing a form that passes the burden of providing the objectionable content to another party.
The Tenth Circuit Court ruled that because the Little Sisters had the option of signing the form, they failed to show that the mandate required a substantial burden on their free exercise of religion.
Last year, the Little Sisters had received temporary protection from the mandate under two orders from the U.S. Supreme Court – one order from the full court and the other from Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who oversees the section of the country where the sisters’ case originated. The orders had protected the Little Sisters from mandate penalties while their case was working its way through the court system.
The Supreme Court has also rule directly on the mandate. In June 2014, it struck down the mandate as it applied to Hobby Lobby and other closely-held for-profit companies.
In its July 14 decision, the Tenth Circuit said that the Hobby Lobby reasoning did not apply in the Little Sisters’ case because they were a non-profit and therefore fell under the terms of the “accommodation,” which were not offered to Hobby Lobby as a for-profit company.
The Tenth Circuit’s order also applies to Christian Brothers Services and Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, the Catholic organizations through which the Little Sisters obtain their health coverage.
“We’re disappointed with today’s decision,” said Mark Rienzi, senior counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is helping to defend the Little Sisters in court.
“After losing repeatedly at the Supreme Court, the government continues its unrelenting pursuit of the Little Sisters of the Poor,” he continued. “It is a national embarrassment that the world’s most powerful government insists that, instead of providing contraceptives through its own existing exchanges and programs, it must crush the Little Sisters’ faith and force them to participate.”
“Untold millions of people have managed to get contraceptives without involving nuns, and there is no reason the government cannot run its programs without hijacking the Little Sisters and their health plan,” Rienzi said.
The Becket Fund said that the Little Sisters and their attorneys are looking into the possibility of appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court.
**The Becket Fund said that the Little Sisters and their attorneys are looking into the possibility of appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court.**
Good.
Time for Civil Disobedience. Same thing my church will do if asked to perform a homosexual wedding. The answer is NO WE WILL NOT COMPLY.
They can—but will one at the time he is needed?
Well said. There is a case to be made for exhausting all legal options, but then it is time to change the playing field.
Defy the mandate. Don’t pay, and dare the IRS goons to slap liens on you and/or arrest you. Make them take the steps they don’t want to take.
The world will learn quickly that sisters like these have spines of steel.
Nothing here is to say that other moves should not be made, moves in the spiritual sphere.
However to pack up your marbles and go home is EXACTLY what these fiends want.
the Little Sisters will leave the USA if need be, read the last paragraph:
The administration will fold like a dime whore under a dollar John.
Ignore the government altogether and ignore the fines. I wouldn’t even try to appeal this. Just go underground.
Good.
Do we really want to put this in the hands of the Robert's court?
Instead of cringing and waffling and maneuvering like weasels, trying to work around each new crime of the government, how about smashing the illegitimate Marxist government pretending to be the “U.S. Government”?
“Not associated with a particular house of worship” is part of the elimination of the “free exercise of religion.” The Marxists have decreed that what we have a right to is “freedom of worship.”
And “worship” takes place inside churches—and nowhere else.
The absolute terror most people (e.g., Catholic bishops) have regarding being dragged off in handcuffs is the reason that the Nazi-Marxists in control of our “government” have been getting their way for fifty years.
When people DID get dragged off in handcuffs because they tried to save the lives of babies at abortion clinics, only one Catholic bishop in America (René Gracida) taught the cops what their duty was: Refuse to assist abortionists to kill babies. Every other bishop allowed the cops in his diocese to commit mortal sin with no correction.
Leni
Gone is our First Amendment rights.
Is this said from faith or from pride?
A bunch of straw men you have certainly presented. True faith does not presume, but it does engage the genuine and willing power of God, not the presumptuousness of a church of men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.