[nickcarraway]

After the Supreme Court’s decision is there any argument against polygamy being legal?

[MrB]

There is none.
If there isn’t THE definition of marriage,
there is NO definition of marriage.

[manc]

Nope and good for them seeing as the homosexuals are against it , and the SCOTUS ruled the equal protection. Now will SCOTUS say this is illegal while their homosexual pals can have their social contract?

[LouAvul]

After the Supreme Court’s decision is there any argument against polygamy being legal?

After scrotus, is there any definition of marriage?

[Duckdog]

Only the money. If they have multiple wives and children. Why do I have to pay to feed an house them.

[napscoordinator]

Noah would be happy. Hard to believe some of our Biblical leaders had a load of wives. How on Earth did they manage. It is tough enough with one. That family on Sister Wives shows how difficult it is to have more then one wife. He is constantly running around trying to put out fires. Is that really a life?

[DoodleDawg]

After the Supreme Court’s decision is there any argument against polygamy being legal?

Polygamists aren't a protected class therefore their Constitutional rights are not being violated by being denied multiple marriages.

[afsnco]

And bestiality, and incest, and “intergenerational” child molesting.

[freedumb2003]

>>After the Supreme Court’s decision is there any argument against polygamy being legal?<<

Word for word, Obergefell applies to marriage between any number of people of any sex or gender or blood relationship.

To REALLY mess with them, I am waiting for an incestuous couple to file. That is 2 people who love each other and want to marry, which matches word for word Obergefell.

Marriage no longer exists as a social or moral institution. So, let’s blow it up completely.