Montana polygamist family applies for marriage license

KRTV-TV ^ | July 1, 2015 | Simone DeAlba - MTN News

[dhs12345]

During the gay marriage debate the answer to polygamists wanting the same rights as gays — “na, don't be ridiculous. That would never happen.”

Well, guess what....

[Duckdog]

Only the money. If they have multiple wives and children. Why do I have to pay to feed an house them.

[plain talk]

They may prevail or they may not. It depends on what outcome the liberals and the Supremes want. Hypothetically speaking — IF they wanted the outcome to NOT allow polygamy .. I feel sure they could come up with bogus verbiage to defend their so-called reasoning. That’s where we are now.

[21twelve]

I was telling my wife that I hope it comes real quick this polygamy thing. I didn't think it would be THIS quick. While it is all wrong, Biblically there is at least a history of multiple wives and concubines, and God being much more tolerant of that than homosexuality. (Not that God liked it, but he still did bless people with many wives).

I think that someone will also soon be testing it with animals. There are lots of people that love their pets more than anything else.

In for a penny, in for a pound.

[umgud]

islam allows up to four......, but no homo’s.

[bkepley]

I was expecting it even quicker. I don’t see how it’s possible it can be denied now.

[Chickensoup]

I wonder whether the Muslims are funding them?

[manc]

agree.
It might wake the sheep up and then they can stop telling us that we are exaggerating. It would be now curious to see what the homosexuals will say seeing as they were against polygamy.

[massmike]

Ironically,while our concerns about our religious liberties were damn near totally dismissed last week,they’ll probably get it by claiming their right to practice their religion is being infringed.

[RKBA Democrat]

We’ll see the intrafamily ones soon.

[manc]

Yep, we don’t have a justice system which is fair, nor do we have judges who abide by the Constitution.

[Bubba_Leroy]

There is no possible good reason to deny polygamists the right to marry if the constitution requires that States recognize homosexuality as a protected right to the purpose of marriage.

Next in line after the polygamists are incest marriages.

Marriage is not about children any more. So why shouldn't a brother and sister or two brothers or two sisters get married?

The fact that some people find the idea disgusting is irrelevant. I find the idea of two men screwing each other in the butt equally disgusting.

[MeganC]

It will be the next USSC case on marriage.

[Cboldt]

-- Render the Supreme Court meaningless. --

They've already done that to themselves. No harm in piling on.

[manc]

Well according to the activist judges, two of which should have recused themselves and one who lied and committed perjury to get the nomination under the 14th amendment and the equal protection clause they should be married.

[commish]

I want to marry my car, my wife says I love it more than her anyway! LOL

[Tired of Taxes]

Did you write that? Very funny. :-)

[kaehurowing]

Where do we file the amicus brief in support?

[Churchillspirit]

Good one !

[kaehurowing]

Can’t wait until the Mormons file a class action for damages for violating their civil rights since the Mormon Wars in the 1800s.