"Slippery slope" is a logical fallacy when it's used to argue, "The reason we can't allow this is because it could lead to that."
But that's not the argument conservatives are making. We've been laying out all the reasons against changing the definition of marriage. "Slippery slope" isn't the reason. But it is what we're headed down.
Slippery slope arguements are logical fallacies?
Well that would explain why the Marxists employ this arguement when it comes to gun “control”
Why not? And, what's to stop the government from putting people in prison that disagree with gay marriage for religious reasons? We already fine 'em out of existence.
Who will stop them? Boehner? McConnell? (Time to move on) Bush (if we have the misfortune of seeing him get elected)?
When will the government start fining the Catholic Church out of the country for disagreeing with what happened this week? Who will stop them?
I think animals are next... mostly for insurance purposes.. People ‘love’ their pets and want to add them to their health care policy... Why not? Love is love, right?
And if the Confederate flag is removed from the capitol building it won’t be removed from war memorials. And if you like your healthcare plan you can keep your plan.
Marriage equality for ALL!!!!!
And Lawrence v Texas didn’t mean that gay marriage would be legalized, if I recall correctly.
May we assume this fool also derides the slippery slope argument when libtards are wailing about Republicans banning abortion?
So the left doesn’t really believe in “equality”? Shocker.
Once society begins its drive down the slippery slope, it's not possible to put the brakes on it. There is abundant historical precedence for polygamy in US history. Plenty. And, just like gay cohabitation, it is being practiced in the US today. Only some wives need to give up some of their legal rights and benefits.
No polygamy is not next. Noe is bestiality. Incest is next, as well as legal recognition of the so-called right to die.
Polygamy isn’t next, you guys. We’ll do pedophilia first before we get around to polygamy. So there!
So, yeah, polygamy won't even be a speed bump in this race to the bottom of the slippery slope.
rushed about polygamy, hell we have been saying it for years only to be laughed at.
My guess: If we have another president, polygamy will be legal before that president leaves office.
Logically, it should have been first. It sure makes more biological sense.
Liberals are Haters.
If people want to be in an Incestuous or Polygamous Marriage, who are Liberals to deny them? After all, it’s all about Equality and Love between Consenting Adults.
Limited equality akin to “All Animals are Equal, but Some Animals are more Equal than others”.
I was going to comment about the Article on that Site, but every time I do, they take it down.
They are twisting themselves into Pretzels defending the issue, just like the five Justices did.
Of course, not one Commenter there brought up Incestuous Marriage. Such a Comment would never see the light of day.
Next stop is polygamy so bisexuals are not denied there full costitutional rights.
Maybe/maybe not, but I can assure that the militant gay mafia will prowl around to find faith based institutions to setup, file lawsuits and shut’m down. First things first ya know.