Posted on 06/26/2015 9:51:32 AM PDT by C19fan
What would have ever given Roberts that idea?
Thats a lot of gauzy schmaltz for a High Court decision, even by the more relaxed standards of the summing-up paragraphs in a majority opinion. The striking thing about Kennedys ruling isnt that he came down the way he did, which was a mortal lock, but that he didnt concern himself with trying to narrow the reasoning to meet the core objection of SSM opponents, that theres no way to get traction on this slippery slope. That would have been beyond the scope of the decision, Kennedy fans will say; polygamy wasnt at issue here so he had no business addressing it. True he had no business addressing it explicitly. But he could have added language that he knew would be pointed back to later when polygamy inevitably lands before the Court. Unlike some forms of marital relationships, a marriage of two members of the same sex is a partnership of equals something like that, or rhetoric about how other forms of marriage might be exploitative by their very nature. Anything to signal to polygamists that if they try to make their play at the Court anytime soon, they may not like which way Kennedy goes on that.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
This whole thing looks scripted.
First he’s his traitorous self. Spits in the face of the Constitution, then insults us all with his BS explanation.
Then an hour later, this comes out, a phony vote when he knew the decision already.
He’s either being blackmailed, or he’s gay and afraid to come out of the closet. Or both.
They can only kill us once.
Polygamy makes a hell of a lot more sense than sodomy, so there’s nothing stopping it.
Can I marry Barack or Michelle and we are all married together? How about farm animals? Can I marry my daughters? Or maybe a 5 year old boy? Kim says that the 14th amendment gives me/she/he/it equal protection under the law. Kim knows, she is famous and famous people know better! I'm not sure why she is famous but she is famous like me. Maybe it's a black thing? Kimmy likes those. Should I make a porn tape too? I'm coming out with my own line of lube products. They will be called Caitlyn Jenner's Slippery Stuff. I could show people how it works if I make a video. Do they have photoshop for videos? I will need that first.
The president said ni**er this week. My word for the week us anus. It is OK to say that word now because everything is OK now. John Roberts told me so.
I'm richer than you and I live in Malibu!
Love, Braitlyn.
“socialists hate Mormons so no polygamy.
But they love Muslims. Hence.... Polygamy.”
Got me there. Isn’t having your morals and laws determined by special interest groups fun? Maybe they can solve this conundrum by implementing Sharia law. That allows for significantly less rights for infidels.
"The man who wants two wives has never had two wives."
My personal opinion is he giving some great advice.
Good point. I think they will legalize polygamy for everyone except Mormons.
I could not care less if this ushers in polygamy. Normalizing homosexuality and is a far worse social ill IMO than polygamy.
Probably better than you think - they'll get to fighting and, inevitably, it will become your fault.
Polygamy can only work in a society that represses women very badly.
With 4 wives will they take turns nagging at me? Or gang up?
Or, in a society where the men have died in disproportional numbers
but think on the lighter side. Consider if you will a bull Dyke with three or four wives. Talk about headaches.
Well, one has an "innie" the other has an "outie", you tell me...I can't figure it out anymore. BTW, Clinton started a lot of this shit with his "depends what the definition of is is".
Do men really want more than one MIL ?
Polygamy will be here in less than five years
Gang up. You forgot the propensity to sync up biologically. Thus, you're in for it four times worse.
But I can sell them right? Or trade them for beer?
The huge mistake was giving them the word MARRIAGE. Redefining something after many thousands of years? No. Leave marriage alone and enjoy the same legal privileges.
Now, the snowball is down the slope and polygamists have a great argument.
Why doesn't everyone get married to each other, then sign up for ONE insurance plan with everyone else named as an additional insured, which typically does not increase the premiums once you get past three or so dependents.
Maybe THAT would do in Obamacare.
It is a Pandora’s box for any kind of marriage. If a father wants to marry his 20 yr. old son, all the arguments made for gay marriage can be made for this marriage.
Next up for the Gaystopo is making pastors and churches allow these “marriages” in the church. The argument will be you have a right to your religion but you can’t force it on the gays that is discrimination so you will allow these marriages in your churches. It is coming as sure as God made little green apples.
But I believe that God’s wrath is about to be unleashed upon this country. Roe v. Wade, now this, God will not be mocked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.