Posted on 06/12/2015 9:29:06 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
Hackers linked to China appear to have gained access to the sensitive background information submitted by intelligence and military personnel for security clearances, several U.S. officials said Friday, describing a second cyberbreach of federal records that could dramatically compound the potential damage.
The forms authorities believed to have been accessed, known as Standard Form 86, require applicants to fill out deeply personal information about mental illnesses, drug and alcohol use, past arrests and bankruptcies. They also require the listing of contacts and relatives, potentially exposing any foreign relatives of U.S. intelligence employees to coercion. Both the applicant's Social Security number and that of his or her cohabitant is required.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the security clearance material is classified.
"This tells the Chinese the identities of almost everybody who has got a United States security clearance," said Joel Brenner, a former top U.S. counterintelligence official. "That makes it very hard for any of those people to function as an intelligence officer. The database also tells the Chinese an enormous amount of information about almost everyone with a security clearance. That's a gold mine. It helps you approach and recruit spies."
The Office of Personnel Management, which was the target of the hack, has not officially notified military or intelligence personnel whose security clearance data was breached, but news of the second hack was starting to circulate in both the Pentagon and the CIA.
The officials said they think the hack into the security clearance database was separate from the breach of federal personnel data announced last week a breach that is itself appearing far worse than first thought. It could not be learned whether the security database breach happened when an OPM contractor was hacked in 2013, an attack that was discovered last year. Members of Congress received classified briefings about that breach in September, but there was no mention of security clearance information being exposed.
The OPM had no immediate comment Friday.
Almost all of the millions of security clearance holders, including CIA, National Security Agency and military special operations personnel, are potentially exposed in the security clearance breach, the officials said. More than 4 million people had been investigated for a security clearance as of October 2014, according to government records.
In the hack of standard personnel records announced last week, two people briefed on the investigation disclosed Friday that as many as 14 million current and former civilian U.S. government employees have had their information exposed to hackers, a far higher figure than the 4 million the Obama administration initially disclosed.
American officials have said that cybertheft originated in China and that they suspect espionage by the Chinese government, which has denied any involvement.
The newer estimate puts the number of compromised records between 9 million and 14 million going back to the 1980s, said one congressional official and one former U.S. official, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because information disclosed in the confidential briefings includes classified details of the investigation.
There are about 2.6 million executive branch civilians, so the majority of the records exposed relate to former employees. Contractor information also has been stolen, officials said. The data in the hack revealed last week include the records of most federal civilian employees, though not members of Congress and their staffs, members of the military or staff of the intelligence agencies.
On Thursday, a major union said it believes the hackers stole Social Security numbers, military records and veterans' status information, addresses, birth dates, job and pay histories; health insurance, life insurance and pension information; and age, gender and race data.
The personnel records would provide a foreign government an extraordinary roadmap to blackmail, impersonate or otherwise exploit federal employees in an effort to gain access to U.S. secrets or entry into government computer networks.
Outside experts were pointing to the breaches as a blistering indictment of the U.S. government's ability to secure its own data two years after a National Security Agency contractor, Edward Snowden, was able to steal tens of thousands of the agency's most sensitive documents.
After the Snowden revelations about government surveillance, it became more difficult for the federal government to hire talented younger people into sensitive jobs, particularly at intelligence agencies, said Evan Lesser, managing director of ClearanceJobs.com, a website that matches security-clearance holders to available slots.
"Now, if you get a job with the government, your own personal information may not be secure," he said. "This is going to multiply the government's hiring problems many times."
The Social Security numbers were not encrypted, the American Federation of Government Employees said, calling that "an abysmal failure on the part of the agency to guard data that has been entrusted to it by the federal workforce."
"Unencrypted information of this kind this is disgraceful it really is disgraceful," Brenner said. "We've had wakeup calls now for 20 years or more, and we keep hitting the snooze button."
Samuel Schumach, an OPM spokesman, would not address how the data was protected or specifics of the information that might have been compromised, but said, "Today's adversaries are sophisticated enough that encryption alone does not guarantee protection." OPM is nonetheless increasing its use of encryption, he said.
The Obama administration had acknowledged that up to 4.2 million current and former employees whose information resides in the Office of Personnel Management server are affected by the December cyberbreach, but it had been vague about exactly what was taken.
J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a letter Thursday to OPM director Katherine Archuleta that based on incomplete information OPM provided to the union, "the hackers are now in possession of all personnel data for every federal employee, every federal retiree and up to 1 million former federal employees."
Another federal employee group, the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, said Friday that "at this point, we believe AFGE's assessment of the breach is overstated." It called on the OPM to provide more information.
Rep. Mike Rogers, the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said last week that he believes China will use the recently stolen information for "the mother of all spear-phishing attacks."
Spear-phishing is a technique under which hackers send emails designed to appear legitimate so that users open them and load spyware onto their networks.
Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this story.
Active Duty ping.
Is “Chinese” the new nickname for the Democratic National Committee?
I know.
Maybe if we had a really big doughnut sale we could pay china for the info Barry has on the GOP and have them publish it.
Not the first time this administration has stabbed America in the back but the absolute worst yet. Irreparable. Absolutely JV, the kind of JV they make fun of in crap movies. Only this is for keeps and a gift that will keep on giving to our enemies (this admin and foreign) for long, long time. Total incompetence. Unbelievable idiocy. We have to take better care of basic unsensitive data where I work than these flaming morons did with personal data from millions of people’s lives. And they think “we’re sorry, we’ll provide some credit monitoring for awhile” will cover their butts.
I gotta laugh at this one. . . tinfoil hat time. . but then again,. . . did Hillary have her DNC hackers do it? . . Through Her Server! . . lots of information there for 'later use' . . I put nothing past the Clintons. . . or the Obamas. . 'The end justifies the means' . .
Pray for America and prepare.
Yep. I get 1 year credit monitoring. My wife gets 90 days.
And the Chinese and everybody else, has my name, ssn, pay data, bank data, credit data, address, plus the phone numbers, addresses, names, of all I included on my SF-86 to renew my clearance.
Yep. I get 1 year credit monitoring. My wife gets 90 days.
And the Chinese and everybody else, has my name, ssn, pay data, bank data, credit data, address, plus the phone numbers, addresses, names, of all I included on my SF-86 to renew my clearance.
The Russians are also likely to have this data and likely also participated in the hack.
I know.
Imagine a fighting war. I get deployed to Japan or Korea. Then my credit cards are maxed out by hackers. My wives credit cards and bank account are compromised. I get a call from my wife, in panic.
Now I have to go out and get my jets ready for the next mission.
Clearly, I will not be on my best game.
this is a joke kind of: is it possible for us American citizens to buy the info from China so WE can see what our own government is doing.
And this same government demands that all our medical records be electronic so government has direct access...
Incompetent to the core...
Yes.
Yep. That form requires a lot of detailed information. It takes a lot of digging on one’s part to even fill it out. I don’t think it includes banking data, but I’m sure the other OPM breaches had plenty of that.
This is just another lesson in government ineptitude. Why do people want to keep handing more power over to a government that is clearly way too big? I don’t know. Yeah. Government will solve all our problems. Geesh!
I don't believe this was a "hack." I believe Obama deliberately gave our enemies this data.
It was deliberate.
Meanwhile, CNN has been covering the fake black woman yesterday like it was the Moon landing...
You and I are on the same page.
They knew over a year ago ISIS had info on people in the military.
ISIS didn’t get it all by themselves, someone gave it to them.
The Chinese would love to see the Clintons back in the WH.
If China is involved a Clinton can’t be far behind.
And this is the same country Obama and the GOPe want to do a secret trade deal with?
And some of that GOPe includes those running and we THOUGHT they had our backs (I won’t name them—you decide...)???
Are there no repercussions for China, like nixing the treaty?
At this stage, I wonder if filling out the credit monitoring service required information is, in itself, creating another confidential database that can be hacked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.