Posted on 06/07/2015 6:26:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Mainstream media has expended much ink over the size and varying quality of the Republican presidential field, and in some respects this is correct. There are a lot of Republicans running, and some are less ready for primetime than others. That happens every election cycle.
Less questioned and less covered is the weakness of the Democratic field. But the clown car of candidates shaping up on the left is everything you’d expect from a party floundering after a leader who, to borrow one of his favorite phrases, drove his party into the ditch.
Barack Obama has been the most successful person in history when it comes to electing Republicans to Congress. He wandered into office with substantial majorities in both houses of Congress and an unfettered ability to push through whatever he and his ilk wanted. And he did.
In the wake of that two-year liberal-fest, the American people flipped the House of Representatives in historic numbers. Four years later, the Senate switched.
The end result of the Obama years is to have a party weaker and less prepared to win a national election.
The president is the leader of the party, and most work to groom up-and-coming members of their party so they can pass the torch to them when they leave the national stage. President Obama has done none of that. As a result, Democrats find themselves with all their eggs in one uninspiring, tired basket.
President George W. Bush found himself in the same situation in 2008. His vice-president had no interest in running to succeed him, no governors had distinguished themselves yet, no members of his cabinet or Congress had, with the help of the White House, found a national voice. The GOP had an island of misfit toys running for a nomination with none ready, either in experience or grassroots support, to unite and lead the party, let alone the nation. Current Democrats are in the same boat.
Sure, Hillary Clinton is known nationally, but a majority of the public finds her uncompelling and untrustworthy. Not what you want in your nominee, no matter how broad your name recognition is. But her resume is fluffed with titles and devoid of accomplishments. She’s a horrible candidate and a scandal machine. Remove her gender, and she’s a non-serious candidate running to increase speaking fees.
The rest of the field are non-entities.
Martin O’Malley’s legacy was tarnished when his lieutenant governor could not win his job in one of the nation’s most Democratic states. Bernie Sanders is the cranky uncle upset there isn’t any pie left. Jim Webb was a non-entity while he was in the Senate, and Lincoln Chafee’s big campaign idea is to convert the nation to the metric system.
Those candidates beg the question: Where are the leaders of the Democratic Party? Who are they? Where are the ideas?
Aside from Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, who are the prominent Democrats? Even on the state level, who are the Democratic governors introducing innovative policy ideas?
They exist; they just don’t register, even with the mainstream media predisposed to prop them up.
Republicans will get a lot of coverage for swiping at each other throughout the primary process like it’s the first time candidates had ever been critical of members of their own party. But the Democrats literally have no one past an empty pantsuit. If something were to happen and Hillary turned her ankle, their bench is empty.
The president and his White House have expended zero calories on anything beyond the cult of his personality and his legacy. They aren’t a ship without a rudder. They are an inner tube.
None of this means Republicans can’t lose to any non-entity with a (D) after his or her name in 2016. The GOP excels at chipping tap-in putts into the sand. Much is made of the demographic shift in the country favoring Democrats in the future. But even in their world where identity politics trumps all, Americans won’t vote en mass for unaccomplished, uninspiring empty suits because they have similar pigment.
If the Democratic field is the best that party has to offer, the cream of the crop, the prospects for the eventual GOP nominee are looking good. If it works out that way and a Republican wins the White House, the person most responsible for that victory will be Barack Obama.
I think both major political parties are dying.
Good.
We are clearly at a crossroads here. We’re either going to rise like a Phoenix or plunge irreversibly into the abyss.
No more middle road. God help us.
You may be right. I certainly don’t feel represented by the Republican party as a whole, which I find to be composed of feckless careerists who cower before a politically corrected media. The Democrats that are unhappy are simply communists and traditional-America hating bigots. They literally admire totalitarian murderers like Che.
The GOP Establishment has been joined at the hip with the DemocRATs for a long time. There is no line of separation between the two and that’s a fact.
I think its time for Hillary to retire, get a butch haircut, start wearing flannel and live out her days with her girlfriend.
Obama used up the rest of the moral capital that the Democratic Party had left. He wasted it on glorifying himself.
What, no Subaru?
Mr. niteowl77
When my ex got a Subaru I said “I had no idea you were a lesbian!”
“We are clearly at a crossroads here. We’re either going to rise like a Phoenix or plunge irreversibly into the abyss.”
In the days of my childhood in the cradle of the Confederacy, such a comment might have been answered with something like, “I reckon hit shore do look attaway, don’t hit?
She has already lived out her days, it is “Weekend at Hillie’s” now. Everything about her is just a dark comedy. The most amazing thing about her candidacy is that some people seem to take her seriously.
IMHO, this was one of Bush's biggest mistakes. Cheney was a poor choice.
If Bush had picked a healthy, conservative running mate that could succeed him, Obama might still be a back-bencher in the Senate.
Of course, Bush would have had to avoid some of his missteps -- especially reigning in Fannie Mae and regulating the derivatives market, so that the financial crisis wouldn't have been as bad. Without that, his vice president would have been tarred with the same brush.
But, we wouldn't have had the succession of losers running for President after that....
Actually the only people I have ever known who owned a Subaru were men and they definitely were NOT gay. Of course I can only think of two people I have ever known to own one. They seem to have a great reputation for durability but every used one I have seen seems to be worn out far beyond the mileage showing. Do all those lesbians drive them over rocky dirt roads out in the woods?
Yup. I’m on my second Subaru. I would have had several more but my next cars seemed to drop in my lap at random.
There aren’t all that many used Subarus on the market, owners tend to drive them until the wheels fall off or pass them on to their kids who do the same.
Half the cars in the parking lot where I work are Subarus. (My area has snow, mountains and deserts, they are VERY piratical cars for tat!)
Never knew that about Subarus. The company should hire actors from "Pirates of the Caribbean" to tout the car for its piratical features.
Arrrrh!
I wouldn’t say gay because they are practical cars, but the three that I see on my daily commute all have bumper stickers endorsing Liberal causes. My last bit of evidence was owned by my next door neighbor who was the beard for his “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” Air Force wife who definitely led a different lifestyle when she was home away from her day job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.