Posted on 05/21/2015 2:35:46 PM PDT by PROCON
The Federal Election Commission, facing punishing criticism for suggesting that political activity on the Internet should be regulated, rejected talk of new rules Thursday, a victory for GOP commissioners who feared Democrats were targeting conservative sites, even the Drudge Report.
During a public meeting, Democrats on the FEC said they were responding to the public outcry in saying that no new rules are required.
Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said the FEC received 5,000 comments demanding the agency keep their hands off the Internet. In response, she proposed a resolution that directly barred Internet regulation.
"I wanted to make clear that I was listening to what people are saying out there and I think we should allay those concerns if people are concerned that we are about to do that," she said. Her resolution said: "I further move that the Commission direct [counsel] to exclude from the rulemaking any proposal affecting political activity on the Internet."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
A temporary victory?
Is this the end of the "net neutrality" nightmare?
4 NOW
Need an old test pattern here
.Please StandBy...Check out the link...lib heads would explode,a good thing,lets bring back the TP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian-head_test_pattern
Is this the Onion?
This will not end.
Until DA UberFüehrer says so.
Jaaaa!!!
It would have never survived a legal challenge.
All victories against evil are temporary.
In this case however the good guys are aided by the fact that leftist voters tend to opiate themselves with all the frivolities the internet can provide. While they are ambivalent on the government screwing up things they don’t understand (like the healthcare system) wrecking the internet might be the only thing that could drive them to care what their masters are doing.
These people will not stop - they are not spineless REPUBLICANS. They keep hammering, trying ways around existing laws and the Constitution, and will use any means possible to achieve their goals.
Wow, some Republicans can take a lesson from these Democrats that actually LISTENED to their constituents.
I suspect there will be some back door attempt before O’fascist leaves office.
Does outcry include democrats anger directed at John Kerry directly?
John Kerry: Internet Needs Stronger Regulations to Work Properly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3291343/posts
“I further move that the Commission direct [counsel] to exclude from the rulemaking any proposal affecting political activity on the Internet.”
We already have that; it’s called the First Amendment.
“...s this the end of the “net neutrality” nightmare?...”
Nope. They’ll be back. It’s a setback to the them, nothing more.
It’s what they do.
I for one do not trust a thing she says. Just a casual search on the web reveals -
US Government (Obama) Cedes Control Of The Internet .....
Obama signs order outlining emergency Internet control ....
Kerry: Internet Needs Stronger Regulations to Work Properly ......
Their desire to control the web is there. Only for now, the regulation on political activities is halted. Temporarily. I still don’t see how they propose to ‘regulate it’.
Hell these idiots could post a countervailing resolution tomorrow. No constitutional issue. They could change it any timr
So they agree they have the power to regulate Speech, a First Amendment violation.
They’re just not gonna do it quite ...... yet.
The Federal Election Commission, facing punishing criticism for suggesting that political activity on the Internet should be regulated, rejected talk of new rules Thursday, a victory for GOP commissioners who feared Democrats were targeting conservative sites, even the Drudge Report. During a public meeting, Democrats on the FEC said they were responding to the public outcry in saying that no new rules are required. Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said the FEC received 5,000 comments demanding the agency keep their hands off the Internet. In response, she proposed a resolution that directly barred Internet regulation.Don't forget, Zero has a pen and a phone.
I love the phrasing here - "feared" targeting? As if it had never happened before? What was the IRS doing again?
They'll be back.
Wool-over- eyes.. Yep.. She said “political activity”. That leaves them wide open to regulate anything they deem otherwise. For example, hate speech. This is not a victory, this is a play on words. Internet control is here, for the good of the children and everyone knows it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.