Skip to comments.
Donny Doesn't Want to Sound Elitist, But 'Astounding How Ignorant People Are'
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 05/21/2015 6:19:08 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
What would Donny say if he DID want to sound elitist?
Ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
05/21/2015 6:19:49 AM PDT
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Donny is clearly misspelling his last name...
3
posted on
05/21/2015 6:26:11 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Well, Donny, could you feed your family if there were no farmers, ranchers and butchers? Can you build a house, repair your car engine? plumbing? electrical?
There are a lot of people in Iowa and across the fruited plain who can do all these things. Sounds like the one sitting in the pundit’s chair of MSNBC is the ignorant one.
4
posted on
05/21/2015 6:26:48 AM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: governsleastgovernsbest
He’s missing the point. Bush’s last name is the equivalent of Obama’s blackness. It is not a reason to vote for someone.
So, once we get past the name, why would we vote for him? Is he conservative or part of GOPe, AKA #uniparty?
5
posted on
05/21/2015 6:33:12 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
For a branding and marketing expert, he sure doesn’t know how to be persuasive or convincing.
6
posted on
05/21/2015 6:38:04 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
He’s right.
Over half the voters in the last election voted for Obama.
7
posted on
05/21/2015 6:39:08 AM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Equivalent question -
If Obama were a Marxist Muslim illegal alien bent on the destruction of America,
how would his actions be different than what he’s currently doing?
8
posted on
05/21/2015 6:40:37 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; stephenjohnbanker; Liz; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; ...
RE:”
Jonny Doesn't Want to Sound Elitist, But ‘Astounding How Ignorant People Are’”His is an elitist lib.
Yet MJ played a clip of Mark Halperin with dedicated Dem voters asking them to name a single accomplishment of Hillary in the State Department, and not one could, and they said they didn't care about that or the Clinton corruption. .
They basically said that they are support Hillary because the Clinton's always beat Republicans at everything ,and Hillary is a ‘strong woman’.
9
posted on
05/21/2015 6:41:30 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: MrB
If Obama were a Marxist Muslim illegal alien ... No doubt that he clearly is ... and a fractionally "black" racist to boot.
10
posted on
05/21/2015 6:42:40 AM PDT
by
glennaro
To: glennaro
See, that’s what the question is supposed to reveal - that his actions belie what the left denies he is.
11
posted on
05/21/2015 6:45:24 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: cuban leaf
Hes missing the point. Bushs last name is the equivalent of Obamas blackness or Hillary!’s vagina. It is not a reason to vote for someone.
12
posted on
05/21/2015 6:50:01 AM PDT
by
null and void
(In a world where lies and propaganda masquerade freely as truth, communication is everything.)
To: txrefugee
I hate to say it but he has a point. Yesterday, they had a focus group on Hillary which was shown on Morning Joe. The group praised her work as secretary of state and then Mark Halprin asked them to name her successes - not one could name any. It was so obvious they didn’t know what they hell they were talking about. In fact, one named “Benghazi” as her major success.
They were just Democrat robots.
13
posted on
05/21/2015 6:53:50 AM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: sickoflibs; GOPJ; hoosiermama; Jane Long; stephenjohnbanker; Grampa Dave; TADSLOS; ken5050; ...
Mark Halperin asked assembled Hillary voters to name a single accomplishment of Secy of State Hillary.....the silence was deafening. The brain-dead Dems said they didn't care about lack of accomplishments or the Clinton corruption. They support Hillary because they hate judgmental Republicans, and Bill and Hillary know how to beat them, and b/c Hillary is a strong woman. Hillary knows how to keep her brain-dead supporters from straying off the reservation.
CASE IN POINT: The craven Hillary finally deigned to answer media questions.......Fox's Ed Henry seemed jubilant that he nailed her---getting to ask hot topic questions about the nefarious Foundation, and her emails from Blumenthal that she tried to keep hidden.
But Hillary played Ed Henry like a violin.....as she mocked him in dulcet tones.
A CONSERVATIVE THINKING LIKE A CLINTON IS NAUSEATING BUT IT MUST BE DONE: Hillary's mocking answers were calculated to keep her supporters enthralled.....b/c she knows they hate Fox News, "judgmental" Republicans, and they don't give a fig that the Clintons got filthy rich using the corrupt Foundation.
14
posted on
05/21/2015 7:08:25 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
To: JRios1968
I believe the T is silent, JR. :)
15
posted on
05/21/2015 7:08:59 AM PDT
by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: txrefugee
People like him struggle to even make a cup of coffee. Their only ‘skill’ is talking.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
17
posted on
05/21/2015 7:15:30 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Did ABC really 'research' the Clinton Cash book and find 'nothing' or was that also lie?)
To: Liz; stephenjohnbanker; GOPJ; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj
I also notice that whenever a Hillary campaign person like Howard Dean gets on a show to defend her they all use the same technique, they change the subject and attack.
Main points :
“Its all coming from right wing attack groups” , (right wing like the NYT ??)
“its a double standard, no-one else is having these same questions asked to them. Is it because she is a woman?”
(yep, no one is asking Ted Cruz about his private email server.
18
posted on
05/21/2015 7:16:10 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: null and void
Hes missing the point. Bushs last name is the equivalent of Obamas blackness or Hillary!s vagina. It is not a reason to vote for someone. If he said as the limited information in the excerpt stated that "people are LESS CONCERNED about his policy positions and MORE CONCERNED about his last name, then he is pretty much saying the same thing as you are except perhaps a little less crassly.
To: Dahoser
I believe the T is silent, JR. :)
20
posted on
05/21/2015 7:30:38 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson