The left wouldn't have liked her much. Homeschooled her kids, was arrested for it.
Fast forward to today, there are places in the world she'd be jailed and even killed for riding in a car with a man, not her husband. Race not a consideration.
The left wouldn't have liked her much. Homeschooled her kids, was arrested for it.
Fast forward to today, there are places in the world she'd be jailed and even killed for riding in a car with a man, not her husband. Race not a consideration.
Pam’s a fox
Did anyone ever bother to look into what it was that infuriated southerners so much about black men putting the moves on white women?
Here's a hint. Someon once said to me, "to a black man, a white woman is a trophy" -- a prize in a pissing contest that exists in the minds of men who have big chips on their shoulders; men who are obsessed with proving their existence...."matters".
Many agree in principle with what Pam Geller is doing, and in their hearts, they know she is doing the right thing.
There is always this “but...” phrase included over and over by the more timid.
“...but why taunt, over and over again...”
“But this &!+c# is CRAZY!”
“...but she WANTS the Israelis to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities!”
And on and on it goes. For years there were those who tried to wake the world up to the Nationalist Socialist threat growing in Germany, or the International Socialist threat spreading from the Soviet Union, but would people listen? NOOOOOO, or at least not until it was much too late to turn things back without a huge expenditure of time, treasure and lives of millions.
O'Reilly's mixed metaphor notwithstanding, I'm impressed (and more than a little surprised) that Goldberg didn't spare his fellow talking head his wrath.
I just realized Bernard Goldberg didn't write this article. One of his contributors did.
Still. It's surprising he let it be posted.
Hopefully he'll allow it to stay on his website.
Pol Pot was wrong to slaughter 2 million innocent Cambodians, BUT...
Goldberg absolutely nails it. Frankly, citizens don’t need the First Amendment if they are to live their lives cowering in silence, and hiding from violent bullies.
It is ridiculous to watch these liberals say that “she was asking for it.” Another blatant, gaudy, hideous example of left wing hypocrisy. They were drawing cartoons - and liberals say that is now forbidden depending on the subject matter? Meanwhile these liberals were all for US taxpayer money to go to Andres Serrano, - so why wasn’t the Piss Christ a hate crime? Because Christians wouldn’t kill Serrano? Violence rules the day? Even in a nation of laws like America? We are descending into a horrible world if that is the case, a nasty brutish short-lived world. If it is our present situation in America that we live in fear for what we might say because someone will do us violence means that they have diminished our nation, and are on the road to destroying it.
Geller also alerted the world to two ISIS Manchurian Candidates hiding in America ready to commit mayhem at the drop of a falafel. Are we to believe they would have done nothing for the remainder of their lives but sit quietly in their basement apartments and re-read the Koran. That is naive! Geller did the nation a service because she alerted us to fanatical murderers in our midst. (Sort of like the police sending free baseball tickets to fugitives who show up to get arrested.)
ISIS Is Not Islam So Get Over It
I am not for mocking people’s religions, but they keep telling me that ISIS is not Islam, and these were ISIS killers so ipso facto Geller was not mocking Islam. The good news is moderate Muslims did not show up to kill the cartoonists but the bad news is that the moderates are attacking Pam Geller instead of the horrible murderous disease within their own body.
Geraldo, O’Reilly & Trump certainly have one thing in common, they are notorious WINDBAGS!
Oh wait, never mind.
Those guys on December 16, 1773. were egging the King on by throwing all that tea in the bay - they were asking for it!
To all those who have not seen this, and do not support abridging the 1st Amendment to protect innocent mulsims from becoming (more) enraged ... who are not afraid of their muslim betters and masters to be ...
Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
I saw that photo fifty years ago! Soon it became known that the MSM, in reporting it, used a VERY YOUNG high School photo of her. She was forty when she was murdered.
BTTT
Thank you!
This is what I posted right after O’Reilly dared to say what he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3287490/posts
I'll save you a click.
No, Mr. O’Reilly, the issue is whether a religion, cult, or out of control government should be given the power to dictate whether We the People are allowed to mock the said, religion, cult or out of control government without being sentenced to death.
That sir, is Freedom.
The enemedia couldn’t care less about free speech. Nothing new.
To steal a line from Mark Steyn, "No you wouldn't."
Then let's add for emphasis, "Not now! Not ever!"
You're all hair an no brains, eh Donnie?
Great column on Bernie’s part.