Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The sun is now virtually blank during the weakest solar cycle in more than a century
vencoreweather.com ^ | 4/30/2015 | unknown

Posted on 05/05/2015 7:54:35 AM PDT by rktman

The sun is almost completely blank. The main driver of all weather and climate, the entity which occupies 99.86% of all of the mass in our solar system, the great ball of fire in the sky has gone quiet again during what is likely to be the weakest sunspot cycle in more than a century. The sun's X-ray output has flatlined in recent days and NOAA forecasters estimate a scant 1% chance of strong flares in the next 24 hours. Not since cycle 14 peaked in February 1906 has there been a solar cycle with fewer sunspots. We are currently more than six years into Solar Cycle 24 and the current nearly blank sun may signal the end of the solar maximum phase. Solar cycle 24 began after an unusually deep solar minimum that lasted from 2007 to 2009 which included more spotless days on the sun compared to any minimum in almost a century.

(Excerpt) Read more at vencoreweather.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: seeuho2; solarcycle; sun; sunspots; suvs; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
...."The main driver of all weather and climate, the entity which occupies 99.86% of all of the mass in our solar system,...." Someone needs to shut these heretics up. How dare they claim that the stupid sun is the main driver for all weather and climate. We all KNOW it's SUVs and See Uh Oh 2. Somebody's gonna pay for these SUN lies.
1 posted on 05/05/2015 7:54:35 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

I believe they had predicted several years ago that this cycle would be a weak one.


2 posted on 05/05/2015 7:56:41 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

How terribly embarrassing for the Global Warmists.


3 posted on 05/05/2015 7:58:09 AM PDT by RhoTheta (US foreign policy under BO: 'Talk butchly and carry a small twig.' -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The White Mosque: “Bush’s fault.”

Gore and the DNC: “It is white people’s fault”.


4 posted on 05/05/2015 7:58:49 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Needs a catchy name...

We’ve had Daltan Minimum, Maunder Minimum, Spörer Minimum and Homeric minimum.

What say you?

Algore Minumum? HockeyStick Minimum? ManBearPig Minimum?


5 posted on 05/05/2015 7:58:53 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

ManBearPig Minimum.


6 posted on 05/05/2015 7:59:44 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I’m going outside to stare at it now let you now how it turns out


7 posted on 05/05/2015 8:00:37 AM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Doesn't look too blank right now:

http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/img/latest/latest_1024_HMIIF.jpg

8 posted on 05/05/2015 8:00:56 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Yep.

My first cycle was a good one, back when I was a kid. I worked the world on 50 Watts.

My last cycle was a good one, where I worked from Texas to California on less than 4 watts of FM. FM, not CW.

And this cycle, probably my last one.. it's gonna be a weak one.

Oh well. I got some good cycles out of it and got to talk the world.

73's all.

/johnny (still listening to 6 meter FM call channel with a handi-talki.)

9 posted on 05/05/2015 8:02:09 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The sun can’t be causing globull warming. It’s too far away!


10 posted on 05/05/2015 8:02:51 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Oh I definitely vote ManBearPig!


11 posted on 05/05/2015 8:03:53 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Time to sell stocks!


12 posted on 05/05/2015 8:04:39 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

13 posted on 05/05/2015 8:05:02 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stboz

It probably was photographs in the interim at the end of April where the sun was blank.


14 posted on 05/05/2015 8:06:17 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

And Buy Gold!


15 posted on 05/05/2015 8:07:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rktman
An increase in solar activity, which is primarily magnetic in nature, may be responsible for a decrease in clouds, at least according to some researches. A decrease in cloud cover of course means more sunlight makes it to the surface, thus leading to an increase in temps. An increase in solar activity also means less galactic cosmic rays make into the atmosphere. GCRs are believed to contribute to cloud formation.

Cosmic Rays Hit Space Age High

NASA.gov
Sept 29, 2009

"We're experiencing the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century," says Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Center, "so it is no surprise that cosmic rays are at record levels for the Space Age [i.e. past 50+ years or so -etl]."

Galactic cosmic rays come from outside the solar system. They are subatomic particles--mainly protons but also some heavy nuclei--accelerated to almost light speed by distant supernova explosions. Cosmic rays cause "air showers" of secondary particles when they hit Earth's atmosphere; they pose a health hazard to astronauts; and a single cosmic ray can disable a satellite if it hits an unlucky integrated circuit.

The sun's magnetic field is our first line of defense against these highly-charged, energetic particles. The entire solar system from Mercury to Pluto and beyond is surrounded by a bubble of magnetism called "the heliosphere." It springs from the sun's inner magnetic dynamo and is inflated to gargantuan proportions by the solar wind. When a cosmic ray tries to enter the solar system, it must fight through the heliosphere's outer layers; and if it makes it inside, there is a thicket of magnetic fields waiting to scatter and deflect the intruder.


An artist's concept of the heliosphere, a magnetic bubble that partially protects the solar system from cosmic rays.

"At times of low solar activity, this natural shielding is weakened, and more cosmic rays are able to reach the inner solar system," explains Pesnell."
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/29sep_cosmicrays.htm

16 posted on 05/05/2015 8:07:18 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RhoTheta
How terribly embarrassing for the Global Warmists.

Are you kidding? They will just continue to doctor temperature evidence and use the Sun's weak cycle as even more proof that globull warming is all the fault of man, not rich, liberal man, just the common man trying to survive.

17 posted on 05/05/2015 8:07:26 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Catastrophism ping


18 posted on 05/05/2015 8:07:29 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Space Weather Enthusiasts Dashboard:

http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts


19 posted on 05/05/2015 8:07:56 AM PDT by glock rocks (noaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
From NASA's Solar and Heliospheric Observatory's "Not So Frequently Asked Questions" section:

Q-Does the number of sunspots have any effect on the climate here on Earth?

A-Sunspots are slightly cooler areas on the surface of the Sun, due to the intense magnetic fields, so they radiate a little less energy than the surroundings. However, there are usually nearby areas associated with the sunspots that are a little hotter (called falculae), and they more than compensate. The result is that there is a little bit more radiation coming from the Sun when it has more sunspots, but the effect is so small that it has very little impact on the weather and climate on Earth.

However, there are more important indirect effects: sunspots are associated with what we call "active regions", with large magnetic structures containing very hot material (being held in place by the magnetism). This causes more ultraviolet (or UV) radiation (the rays that give you a suntan or sunburn), and extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV). These types of radiation have an impact on the chemistry of the upper atmosphere (e.g. producing ozone). Since some of these products act as greenhouse gases, the number of sunspots (through association with active regions) may influence the climate in this way.

Many active regions produce giant outflows of material that are called Coronal Mass Ejections. These ejections drag with them some of the more intense magnetic fields that are found in the active regions. The magnetic fields act as a shield for high-energy particles coming from various sources in our galaxy (outside the solar system). These "cosmic rays" (CRs) cause ionization of molecules in the atmosphere, and thereby can cause clouds to form (because the ionized molecules or dust particle can act as "seeds" for drop formation).

If clouds are formed very high in the atmosphere, the net result is a heating of the Earth - it acts as a "blanket" that keeps warmth in.

If clouds are formed lower down in the atmosphere, they reflect sunlight better than they keep heat inside, so the net result is cooling.

Which processes are dominant is still a matter of research.

http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/classroom/notsofaq.html#SUNSPOT_CLIMATE

20 posted on 05/05/2015 8:08:07 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson