Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: BlatherNaut
The first and foremost tragedy of an adverse decision is that tens of millions of voters will be told that their vote is worth less than manure.
2 posted on
04/30/2015 8:57:39 AM PDT by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: BlatherNaut
That lesbo should recuse herself.
3 posted on
04/30/2015 8:59:06 AM PDT by
Old Yeller
(Civil rights are for civilized people.)
To: BlatherNaut
But we will force you to bake a queer cake. Forget about “reserving the right to refuse service.”
To: BlatherNaut
John J. Bursch, who argued on behalf of marriage, said that the people, not five unelected justices, should be able to decide whether to redefine a pillar of society that predates the government and written history.So they should. But the unwise Latina has a different opinion.
5 posted on
04/30/2015 9:00:00 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: BlatherNaut
All I want is ONE liberal to explain to me if two consenting adults can be married regardless of their gender, then why can't three consenting adults also be married?
Some liberal please ANSWER that and I will actually start listening to your arguments.
6 posted on
04/30/2015 9:00:40 AM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: BlatherNaut
Well, that’s a relief. Now we can go on to properly taxes on non conforming churches and/ or denominations.
7 posted on
04/30/2015 9:00:56 AM PDT by
JimSEA
To: BlatherNaut
There is no way to fix stupid.
9 posted on
04/30/2015 9:01:30 AM PDT by
mulligan
(I)
To: BlatherNaut
The Supreme Court lite off the Civil War (But was by no means the only reason) with Dred Scott v. Sandford.
What has made people rely on them so much?
They gave us The Civil War, Segregation, Abortion.
What good have they done?
Ummmm...... Campaign Finance Reform.....yay(?)
10 posted on
04/30/2015 9:02:53 AM PDT by
KC_Lion
(This Millennial is for Cruz!)
To: BlatherNaut
[[One moment in the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over same-sex marriage reveals what an embarrassment Sonia Sotomayor is as a justice.]]
I was reading through the arguments last night, and she kept trying to interrupt kennedy, alito, and Roberts, but they just kept talking over her- and it dawned on me that the reason they were doing so was because she was asking ridiculous questions and interrupting the adults In the room who were trying to engage in a deep discussion about this issues-
It was painfully obvious she was out of her league trying to pretend she belonged-
11 posted on
04/30/2015 9:03:54 AM PDT by
Bob434
To: BlatherNaut
You would think if they wanted to pack the Court with Leftists, they would at least pick someone (Lawrence Tribe?) with an IQ higher than the temperature on a spring day in Maine. :)
12 posted on
04/30/2015 9:04:03 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
(Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
To: BlatherNaut
...just perform the marriage, bake a cake for it, attend the wedding as a photographer, throw rice, and only approve of the whole proceeding.
Other than that, you’re fine.
16 posted on
04/30/2015 9:05:19 AM PDT by
bolobaby
To: BlatherNaut
17 posted on
04/30/2015 9:05:35 AM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: BlatherNaut
Sotomayor: Were not taking away your liberty, because we wont force you to marry a gay person. Yet...
20 posted on
04/30/2015 9:06:40 AM PDT by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: BlatherNaut
We won’t force you to marry a gay person...? Not yet!
To: BlatherNaut
If you refuse to marry the homosexual couple they will take away your freedom.
Pray America is waking
22 posted on
04/30/2015 9:09:53 AM PDT by
bray
(Cruz to the WH)
To: BlatherNaut
What a moron.
Is she then going to also stipulate that the state cannot force you to cater to cater or officiate a same sex wedding?
23 posted on
04/30/2015 9:10:09 AM PDT by
aquila48
To: BlatherNaut
“And we’re asking you to affirm every individual’s fundamental liberty interest in deciding the meaning of marriage.”
Exactly, Justice. I affirm that. Thus, the government should not coerce an individual to accept a definition of marriage that violates their religious principles.
I gave her pass on the phrase “fundamental liberty interest”. What on earth does that mean?
To: BlatherNaut
“I suspect even with us giving gays rights to marry...
Typical Leftist. They think they bestow rights. Our rights come from God, not from man (or from a wise Latina, for that matter)
28 posted on
04/30/2015 9:17:20 AM PDT by
bk1000
(A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
To: BlatherNaut
"Every single individual in this society chooses, if they can, their sexual orientation, or who to marry or not marry."
Whoops, Sandra needs to get back on message - gay is NOT a choice, it is genetic, it is "what people are."
Well, kinda, sorta. Because we are also told that gender is a social construct, and that it is unfair to force people to accept the gender indicated by their sexual organs.
We are also told that gender is something that can be a result of mere "self-identification," that it can change, and that there are no hard-and-fast boundaries between gender categories.
So homosexuality is genetically-based, except when it isn't, or . . . whatever.
To: BlatherNaut
Not "forcing" us to marry a gay person! Is this woman stupid or nuts or what???
All sex education "forces" the idea of gay sex as healthy and good.
Kids are being "forced" to not judge others.
If we watch TV we are "forced" to accept a lifestyle that is at its core disgusting.
If we dare to voice an opinion or sell a cake without a gay couple on top of it we are "forced" to accept the wrath of the entire gay media.
And then we are sued for making them feel bad.
Good Lord!! This lady is stupid beyond repair.
33 posted on
04/30/2015 9:19:57 AM PDT by
Slyfox
(If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson