Posted on 04/27/2015 5:10:47 AM PDT by Resettozero
Perhaps the most surprising thing about the forthcoming book rocking Washington right now is the number of stunning facts liberal media outlets have already confirmed and verified are accurate.
Here, then, are 11 facts that mainstream media say are true, verified, and facts from the upcoming blockbuster, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.
CONFIRMED: Hillarys Foundation Hid a $2.35 Million Foreign Donation from the Head of the Russian Govts Uranium Company that Had Business Before Hillary Clintons State Dept.a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration
The New York Times has confirmed that Hillary Clinton violated the Memorandum of Understanding she signed with the Obama administration promising to disclose all foreign donations during her tenure as Sec. of State.
As Clinton Cash reveals, Ian Telfer, the foreign head of the Russian-owned uranium company, Uranium One, which Hillary Clinton approved to acquire U.S. uranium, made four individual hidden donations to the Clinton Foundation totaling $2.35 million, none of which appear in Clinton Foundation disclosures.
CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Bagged $500,000 for a Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-linked Bank
The New Yorker confirms that, as Clinton Cash claims, Bill Clinton made $500,000 for a Moscow speech that was paid for by a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin at the time of the Uranium One deal.
Why was Bill Clinton taking any money from a bank linked to the Kremlin while his wife was Secretary of State? asks the liberal publication.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Bow and grovel? SERIOUSLY?
They will ask Premier Obamugabe what he considers an appropriate response to these shenanigans.
This, IMO, is not an ethical lapse. Profiting from selling political favors IS against the law. There are politicians under indictment or sitting in jail now for what Hillary is accused of doing.
FACT CHECK The 2008 Memorandum of Understanding (at the time of her confirmation as Secy of State) laid out the new rules for donations to the Clinton Foundation intended to allow the Foundation to continue its important philanthropic work around the world, while avoiding conflicts.
The Memorandum was signed by Clinton confidante Bruce Lindsey, then the Clinton Foundations chief executive...
Also signed by Valerie Jarrett, then co-chair of Obamas transition team...later insider Jarrett became Obama's Senior Deputy Advisor....now more popularly known as "The WH Laundress".
If there is any wrongdoing by the Clinton you can rest assured Attorney General Loretta Lynch will get to the bottom of it. /s
In short, the Clinton Foundation is a slush fund scam just like what William Magear “Boss” Tweed did with New York City’s Tammany Hall between the early 1850’s and 1873.
“Its going to be up to Loretta Lynch, isnt it?”
It’s a bit unclear right now who the control of the attackers is, but it is CERTAIN that this is not happening because of a VRWC book that is not even published yet. To get the NYT and WaPo both moving on her, while DeBlasio refuses endorsement and her Finance Director quits, SOMEBODY big on the Left wants her out.
If HDR and the Big He don’t have the goods on “Obama”, and if they can’t retire to Orgy Island because of the promises they’ve made to foreign donors, then, yes, I expect Loretta Lynch to bring them both down, hard.
Distractions created by a vast right wing conspiracy.
The rapacity of the Clintons is amazing even by the Ceausescu’s standards.
“Now the question is, what will McConnell and/or Boehner do about these criminals, other than bow and grovel?”
Congress does not have (and should not have) prosecutory power. Just look at Trey Gowdy’s fundraising emails if you want to know why.
Well, she works for Obama, and he's one vindictive SOB.
You are exactly right. Makes her look like an Old Salt.
There seems to be enough evidence about Ms. Clinton to show “reasonable cause” why she is ineligible for the job of POTUS. She is clearly a corrupt politician.
So will the scandals hurt or help Hillary? She is old, which is only a marginal problem, but so are her ideas; she is attached to a whole graveyard of failed dogmas, and has learned nothing from recent history except that stonewalling works if the media is your ally. She is corrupt. She is arrogant. She holds her adversaries in contempt. She will stop at nothing to win. And her supporters approve of all this, because these are the markers that enable them to recognize Hillary as one of their own.
<><> Was Uranium One corporate money ever deposited in Russian banks?
<><> Maybe Sberbank or Vnesheconombank?
<><> Maybe funneled from there to secret numbered accounts in Zurich and Geneva?
<><> Maybe secret accounts held by Obama?
We peons are asked to believe that Obama was on the golf course when foreign policy decisions were being made......looking like he "didn't know" about all these radical changes in foreign policy.
Heck, it wasn't b/c Valerie "forgot" to tell him.
<><> Maybe the deal was Obama pleading abject ignorance about US foreign policy being jerked around by the Clintons.......as long as he got his cut of the Clintons' foreign policy finagling?
By “Obama”, I presume you are referring to the man who Bill Clinton said should be getting his coffee instead of running for President?
Do you think Val Jar and Soetoro have forgotten that eruption of white privilege?
Old news. Time to move on
Democrat voters elect Democrat politicians in the hope that the Democrat politicians will steal money to give to Democrat voters.
“It’s OK for you to steal a dollar from my fellow citizens as long as you give me a nickel of that dollar.”
Politics used to be about selecting the best person for a job. The best person was the one who could get the most effective and efficient use out of every hard-earned taxpayer dollar. Do you see anybody running campaign ads saying that?
We need to cut out all the bullshirt and take a long, hard look at the American voter. There are always going to be con men promising something for nothing. We used to have a population that for the most part, knew to stay away from con men.
President Bill Clinton and his cronies got caught taking bribes from Chinese agents. The American Press looked the other way. Hillary didn’t divorce Bill.
These Democrats knowingly elect thieves and then seem surprised that the thieves steal larger and larger amounts for themselves. The Clintons don’t see their stealing of ever larger amounts of money as being worse criminal behavior. They just think they’re being ambitious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.