Posted on 04/23/2015 3:41:42 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
In a Fox News preview of The Tangled Clinton Web, a New York Times reporter accused the Clinton Foundation of lying to her about a meeting Bill Clinton had with Kazatomprom officials regarding the sale of uranium to Russia.
Frank Giustra arranged for officials to go to Bill Clintons house in Chappaqua, reporter Jo Becker said.
When I first contacted the Clinton Foundation, they denied any such meeting ever took place. And when we told them we have already talked to the head, who not only told us all about the meeting but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home, that he proudly displays on his office wall, they then acknowledge the meeting had taken place.
Beckers scathing report based off of allegations in the book Clinton Cash found that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in return for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approving the transaction of American uranium into Russian hands.
The New York Times, Fox News, and other media outlets have arranged an exclusive agreement to report on the stories referred to in Clinton Cash. The Clinton Foundation remains under a mountain of scandal accusations that will only get worse as more reports are sure to be filed in the coming weeks offering more examples of the Clintons blurred lines while in power.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
She will rise from the pile of manure that is her life smelling like a rose. Well, maybe not a rose but you get the picture. Don’t hold your breath waiting for Loretta Lynch to investigate.
Think orange pantsuit. Just a matter of time unless she can get this to move fast and receive a pardon from O. Our best bet is to drag out the investigation until Rs can bring Hill-Billy to trial.
Hillry’s presidential aspirations are toast. Here’s praying she and everyone else involved is hung for treason.
In other news
"The Vito Corleone Foundation helps the poor in every country, gives grants to artists, funds medical research, and is particularly dedicated to the resurrection of Sicily." ―Mary Corleone
/tin-foil-hat on/
There seems to be a pattern of mainstream, liberal media attacking the Clintons recently. Have they decided to take Hillary down again, like they did to push Barack the Fist on us eight years ago? Do they have Barack’s successor chosen, or are they merely blocking Hillary? I find it hard to believe that all of this is just a coincidence, not from outlets that found nothing negative to report on a drug-addled communist in the same time period.
/tin-foil-hat off/
Hat on:
She signed an agreement with the Obamas that they’d not receive funds and did it anyway. She was told not to hire Blumenthal but did it anyway. If O doesn’t want to be pulled into Hill-Billy scandal they will need to sick Lorette Lynch on her-them
Corn rows, kiting (aka fishing), tattoos, prison jobs,
gurl friends, prison make-up sessions, orange pant suits,
commissary.....see it all on the new MSNBC spin-off series...........”LOCKDOWN: Jaillary and Her Posse”
.....I AM yo CHAMPEEN, ma bitchiz!!!
I saw that on Fox tonight. Wow.
The New York Times turns on Hillary twice in less than a week?!?
These Clintons—A number 1 scum.
They have joined FOX and another paper in investigating parts of the CLINTON CASH book before it’s released. Others are pyling on. FOX special is tomorrow night at 10.
Since all are just connecting dots provided in book expect all Hades to explode soon She can either step down and keep the money or return it all
She’ll try keeping the money
What's happened to the New York Times? They used to be so scuzzy... Are they going honest?
Yes, liars lie. But it looks like these two liberal elites - Bill and Hill - sold out the country for only 31 million... That's chump change on the world stage. How do you feel about that?
Let's put on our PR hats, shall we? Why tell us this now? Consider the sources. This cannot possibly be a simple "news" story.The "Destroy Hillary" story-line might be subject to a variety of interpretations:
(1)
By bringing up the slings and arrows at this point in the campaign, Team Hillary may be delivering a pre-emptive strike. Get the potentially damaging material out in the open, so that it can be sliced and diced over the summer of 2015, so that by the time the real campaign season opens up a full year from now, by then the machine will have completely spun the bad stuff. Besides, remember we are dealing with an electorate that cannot name its own representatives, nor the capital of their state, much less know who, what or where Ben Gazzee is. They will have long since forgotten anything brought up this year.
(2)
The NYT and WaPo may have so surrendered the wits of their "editors" to The Obama Admin, Valerie Jarrett, and other people of color who must be obeyed that they have slavishly taken up Obama's side in his war against the Clintons. Remember Bill Clinton is a true racist whose first thought about Barack Hussein Obama was to "send him out for coffee." The instructions might be "Dump Hillary. Break ground for Warren or O'Malley."
BTW, never forget my personal favorite DemoTicket, Joe and Michelle!
(3)
Maybe the Left senses a McGovern-type debacle in the wings and wants to switch over to a less polarizing candidate.
The Democratic Party is Mayonnaise - they've got nowhere else to go!
His vice president (net worth north of $300,000,000) was no slouch in this department either.
Thanks for posting this.
May 5, 2015 to be exact
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.