Doing his part to keep her on the bench for another 20 months.
Antonin, get a clue. Try to find a kind word or a word of praise that she has had for you over the decades. If she ever uttered such, she would immediately lose her iconic status on the left, which she wouldn’t risk ,even if she didn’t hold you in contempt.
RUTH “Buzzy”.
Is she the one that got drunk and passed out at the state of the union address?
Countering any shift towards patriotism.
Has the old gremlin ever veered just once to the right on her scotus opinions? Meanwhile we got the waffler in Kennedy and the stab your back Roberts on Obamacare.
In before the somnolent Ginsberg pics appear.
Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Bryer, Roberts & Kagan attended Harvard Law School (corrections welcome). And I’d like to know what students are getting indoctrinated with at that law school since it evidently isn’t the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.
And speaking of justices, consider that if the 17th Amendment had never been ratified then there would probably be all different faces on the Supreme Court at this time. Such justices would likely share the religious and family values of the federal senators who voted for them, senators who likewise reflect the values of the state lawmakers who voted for them.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear.
Nino is a diplomat as well as a jurist.
Any Justice who suggests to another nation that our constitution is inferior to that of South Africa or any other nation, and who feels American courts should consider the laws of other nations in rendering judicial decisions is manifestly unfit to sit on the Supreme Court or any other court in America.
I doubt if that wretched creature Ginsburg would express similar positive opinions about Scalia or any other conservative.
Why must conservatives like Scalia continue to treat mean spirited destructive ideologues of the left like Ginsburg with any degree of respect? It’s not being classy, it just being stupid.
The woman is a glittering jewel of collosal ignorance.
But then again, so are the TIME writers.
Such is the fate of buffoons.
Well there’s no reason to click through to that article. The first sentence confirms it, the author is a sycophantic fool.
One follows the constitution the other uses international law.
Unforced error by The Scalia. If you put together everything he has said over time, you’d conclude he likes Ginsburg, thinks she’s smart and she’s nice, and thinks her written opinions are way, way off the mark. Given all that, why did he have to write that glowing endorsement, which will be misinterpreted by so many? He doesn’t need to trash her; keeping silent and just saying “we’re friends” are also very good options!